Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Xunzi pp 475-501

Part of the Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy book series (DCCP, volume 7) | Cite as

The Xunzi in Edo Japan

Chapter

Abstract

The Xunzi was transmitted to Japan as early as the ninth century. However, prior to the Edo period (1603–1867), few people had read the Xunzi. It was not until the early part of the eighteenth century that Japanese studies of Xunzi began to flourish, namely when an important thinker in the intellectual history of the Edo period, Ogyū Sorai 狄生徂徠 (1666–1728), carefully read and commented on the Xunzi. Furthermore, with respect to Japanese intellectual history, Sorai’s own thinking was also stimulated by the Xunzi. Others, ranging from Edo-period Confucians after Sorai down to recent researchers, have especially emphasized this point, and have believed that Sorai’s thought is just a sort of extension of Xunzi’s thought. With regard to this view, the present essay adopts a relatively reserved attitude, however. To speak of its conclusion first, this essay judges that one cannot say that Sorai’s thought is just a sort of Edo-period extension of Xunzi’s thought, but rather it is the case that, based on “Ming dynasty knowledge” and under the guidance of the methodology of kobunjigaku / guwencixue 古文辭學 (“the study of ancient words and phrases”), Sorai uses the Xunzi to reconstruct “the Way of the sages.” The Xunzi is thus indeed an important text that stimulates Sorai’s thought, but there are many intellectual differences between Sorai and Xunzi that need to be clarified. This essay will focus on discussing these questions. Subsequently, based on this study, it will discuss the development of scholarship on Xunzi in Edo Japan after Sorai.

Bibliography

  1. Asakawa, Zen’an 朝川善庵. 1978. Discussions of the Xunzi 荀子述. In Collected Writings of Japanese Confucians 日本儒林叢書, ed. Seki Giichirō 関 儀一郎, vol. 10. Tokyo: Ōtori Shuppan 鳳出版.Google Scholar
  2. Fujikawa, Masakazu 藤川正數. 1980. The Activities of Japanese Confucians in the History of Commentaries on the Xunzi 荀子注釋史における邦儒の活動. Tokyo: Kazama Shobō 風間書房.Google Scholar
  3. Fujikawa, Masakazu 藤川正數. 1990. The Activities of Japanese Confucians in the History of Commentaries on the Xunzi (Supplement) 荀子注釋史における邦儒の活動(續篇). Tokyo: Kazama Shobō 風間書房.Google Scholar
  4. Han, Dongyu 韓東育. 2003. The New Legalists in Japan’s Recent History 日本近世新法家. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju 中华书局.Google Scholar
  5. Hashimoto, Keiji 橋本敬司. 2009. “The History of Research on the Xunzi since the Meiji: Teachings on Human Nature, Theories of Heaven and Humanity” 明治以降の『荀子』研究史 : 性説・天人論. The Hiroshima University Studies, Graduate School of Letters 廣島大學大學院文學研究科論集 69(2): 1–67.Google Scholar
  6. Hattori, Nankaku 服部南郭. 1978. The Jottings of Master Nankaku Under the Lamplight 南郭先生燈下書. In Collected Writings of Japanese Confucians 日本儒林叢書, ed. Seki Giichirō 関 儀一郎, vol. 3. Tokyo: Ōtori Shuppan 鳳出版.Google Scholar
  7. Hattori, Nankaku 服部南郭. 1988. “Record of Books Written by Master Bustu” 物夫子著述書目記. In The Complete Compendium of the Collected Writings of Recent Confucians, Volume 7: The Collected Writings of Master Nankaku 近世儒家文集集成 第 07 巻: 南郭先生文集, ed. Hino Tatsuo 日野龍夫. Tokyo: Perikansha ぺりかん社.Google Scholar
  8. Hirose, Tansō 廣瀬淡窗. 1978. An Evaluation of Confucian Scholars 儒林評. In Collected Writings of Japanese Confucians 日本儒林叢書, ed. Seki Giichirō 関 儀一郎, vol. 3. Tokyo: Ōtori Shuppan 鳳出版.Google Scholar
  9. Hu, Shi 胡適. 1986. A History of Ancient Chinese Philosophy 中國古代哲學史. Taipei: Yuanliu Chubangongsi 遠流出版剬司.Google Scholar
  10. Hutton, Eric, trans. 2014. Xunzi: The Complete Text. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Cited here as “H” followed by “page number.line number.”)Google Scholar
  11. Inoue, Tetsujirō 井上 哲次郎. 1902. The Philosophy of the Japanese School of Ancient Learning 日本古學派之哲學. Tokyo: Fuzanbō 冨山房.Google Scholar
  12. Kitada, Kazuichi 北田數一. 1941. An Explanation and Synopsis of Ogy ū Sorai’s Reading Xunzi 荻生徂徠讀荀子解題敍説. Tokyo: Shinbi Shoin 審美書院.Google Scholar
  13. Kubo, Chikusui 久保筑水. N.d. The Xunzi, with Additional Commentary (Junshi zōchū) 荀子増注. Osaka: Aokisūzandō 青木嵩山堂. (Accessed 7/1/2015 at the Waseda University Library Database of Japanese and Chinese Classics 早稲田大学図書館古典籍総合データベース: http://www.wul.waseda.ac.jp/kotenseki/html/bunko17/bunko17_w0010/index.html)
  14. Kurozumi, Makoto 黒住真. 2003. Recent Japanese Society and Confucianism 近世日本社会と儒教. Tokyo: Perikansha ぺりかん社.Google Scholar
  15. Lau, D.C. 劉殿爵, and F.C. Chen 陳方正, eds. 1992. A Concordance to the Liji 禮記逐字索引. Hong Kong: The Commercial Press 商務印書館. (Cited here as “LJ.”)Google Scholar
  16. Lau, D.C. 劉殿爵, and F.C. Chen 陳方正, eds. 1996. A Concordance to the Xunzi 荀子逐字索引. Hong Kong: The Commercial Press 商務印書館. (Cited here as “HKCS.”)Google Scholar
  17. Lidin, Olof, trans. 1970. Ogyū Sorai: Distinguishing the Way (Bendō). Tokyo: Sophia University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Maruyama, Masao 丸山真男. 1952. Research on the History of Japanese Political Thought 日本政治思想史研究. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten 岩波書店.Google Scholar
  19. Mizukami, Masaharu 水上雅晴. 2007. “On Ōta Kinjō’s Studies of the Classics: Learning from Edo Eclecticism and the Qing Dynasty Synthesis of Han and Song Learning” 大田錦城の經學について―江戶の折衷學と清代の漢宋兼採の學, Tōyō kotengaku kenkyū 東洋古典學研究 24: 115–33.Google Scholar
  20. Ogyū, Sorai 荻生徂徠. 1941. Reading Xunzi (Doku Junshi) 讀荀子. In Unofficial Collection of Sorai Sanjin’s Writings 徂徠山人外集. Ed. Kitada Kazuichi 北田數一 and Ogyū Keiichi 荻生敬一, Tokyo: Shinbi Shoin 審美書院.Google Scholar
  21. Ogyū, Sorai 荻生徂徠. 1973a. Distinguishing the Way (Bendō) 辨道. In Ogyū Sorai 荻生徂徠. Nihon shisō taikei 日本思想史大系, ed. Yoshikawa Kōjirō 吉川幸次郎 et al., vol. 36. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten 岩波書店.Google Scholar
  22. Ogyū, Sorai 荻生徂徠. 1973b. Distinguishing Names (Benmei) 辨名. In Ogyū Sorai 荻生徂徠. Nihon shisō taikei 日本思想史大系, ed. Yoshikawa Kōjirō 吉川幸次郎 et al., vol. 36. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten 岩波書店.Google Scholar
  23. Ogyū, Sorai 荻生徂徠. 1977. Notes on the Analects (Rongo chō) 論語徴. In Complete Writings of Ogyū Sorai, vol. 3 荻生徂徠全集 第 03 巻, ed. Ogawa Tamaki 小川環樹. Tokyo: Misuzu shobō みすず書房.Google Scholar
  24. Ogyū, Sorai 荻生徂徠. 1985a. “Reply to Asaka Tanpaku 3” 復安澹泊 3. In The Complete Compendium of the Collected Writings of Recent Confucians, Volume 3: The Collected Writings of Sorai (Soraishū) 近世儒家文集集成 第 03 巻: 徂徠集, fascicle 28, ed. Hiraishi Naoaki 平石直昭. Tokyo: Perikansha ぺりかん社.Google Scholar
  25. Ogyū, Sorai 荻生徂徠. 1985b. “Postscript to Carving [Woodblocks for Printing] the Xunzi” (Kokujunshi Batsu) 刻荀子跋. In The Complete Compendium of the Collected Writings of Recent Confucians, Volume 3: The Collected Writings of Sorai (Soraishū) 近世儒家文集集成 第 03 巻: 徂徠集, fascicle 18, ed. Hiraishi Naoaki 平石直昭. Tokyo: Perikansha ぺりかん社.Google Scholar
  26. Ogyū, Sorai 荻生徂徠. 1985c. “Reply to Sui Shindō [Mizutari Hakusen 水足博泉] 2” 復水神童 2. In The Complete Compendium of the Collected Writings of Recent Confucians, Volume 3: The Collected Writings of Sorai (Soraishū) 近世儒家文集集成 第 03 巻: 徂徠集, fascicle 24, ed. Hiraishi Naoaki 平石直昭. Tokyo: Perikansha ぺりかん社.Google Scholar
  27. Ogyū, Sorai 荻生徂徠. 1985d. “To Yabu Shin’an 7” 與藪震菴 7. In The Complete Compendium of the Collected Writings of Recent Confucians, Volume 3: The Collected Writings of Sorai (Soraishū) 近世儒家文集集成 第 03 巻: 徂徠集, fascicle 23, ed. Hiraishi Naoaki 平石直昭. Tokyo: Perikansha ぺりかん社.Google Scholar
  28. Ogyū, Sorai 荻生徂徠. 1985e. “Introductory Discussion of the Han Feizi” 韓非子會業引. In The Complete Compendium of the Collected Writings of Recent Confucians, Volume 3: The Collected Writings of Sorai (Soraishū) 近世儒家文集集成 第 03 巻: 徂徠集, fascicle 18, ed. Hiraishi Naoaki 平石直昭. Tokyo: Perikansha ぺりかん社.Google Scholar
  29. Ogyū, Sorai 荻生徂徠. 1985f. “Answer to Kutsu Keizan [Hori Keizan 堀景山] 1” 答屈景山 1. In The Complete Compendium of the Collected Writings of Recent Confucians, Volume 3: The Collected Writings of Sorai (Soraishū) 近世儒家文集集成 第 03 巻: 徂徠集, fascicle 27, ed. Hiraishi Naoaki 平石直昭. Tokyo: Perikansha ぺりかん社.Google Scholar
  30. Ogyū, Sorai 荻生徂徠. 2011. Discourse on Government (Seidan) 政談, ed. and with commentary by Hiraishi Naoaki 平石直昭. Tokyo: Tōyō Bunko東洋文庫.Google Scholar
  31. Ōta, Kinjō 大田錦城. 1804 [Bunka 文化 year 1]. Discourses on the Nine Classics 九經談. Edo [Tokyo]: Keigendō 慶元堂.Google Scholar
  32. Sato, Masayuki 佐藤將之. 2013. “The Ruler Standing between Heaven and Earth: The Concepts of Dao and De in the Zhuangzi and the Xunzi.” 天人之間的帝王—《莊子》和《荀子》的「道德」觀念探析. Chinese Studies 漢學研究 31(1): 1–35.Google Scholar
  33. Seki, Giichirō 関儀一郎, ed. 1978. Collected Writings of Japanese Confucians 日本儒林叢書. Tokyo: Ōtori Shuppan 鳳出版.Google Scholar
  34. Slingerland, Edward, trans. 2003. Confucius: Analects, with Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. Sugamoto, Hirotsugu 菅本大二. 1991 “Xun Zi’s Acceptance of Legalists’ Thought—Focusing on the Structure of ‘Li’” 荀子における法家思想の受容—「礼」の構造に即して. Bulletin of the Sinological Society of Japan 日本中國學會報 43: 15–29.Google Scholar
  36. Sugimoto, Tatsuo 杉本達夫. 1966. “Reading Xunzi and Judgments on Xunzi” 「讀荀子」と「荀子斷」. Jinbun gakuhō 人文学報 53: 83–108.Google Scholar
  37. Tajiri, Naofumi 田尻尚文. 2013. “Ogyū Sorai and Xunzi” 荻生徂徠と荀子. Chūgoku kenkyū Shūkan 中國研究集刊 57: 82–89.Google Scholar
  38. Tsukada, Taihō 冢田大峯. 1795 [Kansei 寛政 year 7]. Judgments on Xunzi (Junshi dan) 荀子斷. Kyoto: Kasai Ichirobē 葛西市郎兵衛.Google Scholar
  39. Tsukada, Taihō 冢田大峯. 1978. Record of Extemporaneous Thoughts 隨意錄. In Collected Writings of Japanese Confucians 日本儒林叢書, ed. Seki Giichirō 関儀一郎, vol. 1. Tokyo: Ōtori Shuppan 鳳出版.Google Scholar
  40. Uchiyama, Toshihiko 内山俊彦. 1999. Xunzi 荀子. Tokyo: Kodansha 講談社.Google Scholar
  41. Yan, Lingfeng 嚴靈峯, ed. 1979. Wuqiubeizhai Collected Editions of the Xunzi 無求備齋荀子集成. Taibei: Chengwen Chubanshe 成文出版社.Google Scholar
  42. Yanagisawa, Minami 柳澤南. 1980. “Baien and Xunzi” 梅園と荀子. Kikan nihon shisōshi 季刊日本思想史 15: 36–52.Google Scholar
  43. Yanagisawa, Minami 柳澤南. 1981. “Bantō and Xunzi” 蟠桃と荀子. Research on Ethical Thought 倫理思想研究 6: 99–110.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Social Research and Cultural StudiesNational Chiao Tung UniversityHsinchu CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations