Advertisement

Child Death Review Teams

  • Emily M. Douglas
Chapter
  • 168 Downloads

Abstract

One of the most well known responses to fatal child maltreatment has been the establishment of child death review teams. These are multidisciplinary work groups, comprised at the state or county level, that meet regularly to review the death of children. The goal is to study child and family characteristics and to examine the potential services that the child and family may have been receiving. With an eye toward prevention, child death review teams aim to identify missed opportunities to take protective action on behalf of children before their death. Child death review teams are governed by state statute and their operations are increasingly streamlined by the National Center for the Review and Prevention of Child Deaths. This chapter describes the activities and outcomes of child death review teams. There is wide spread use of child death review teams both inside and outside of the United States. The efficacy of review teams is unknown because of a lack of research. This chapter discusses the potential contributions that this policy and programmatic response have made in the arena of fatal child maltreatment.

Keywords

Child maltreatment fatality Child death review teams Child welfare internal review 

References

  1. Allen, L., Lenton, S., Fraser, J., & Sidebotham, P. (2014). Improving the practice of child death overview panels: A paediatric perspective. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 99(3), 193–196. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Academy of Pediatrics. (2010). Policy statement – Child fatality review. Pediatrics, 126(3), 592–596. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Axford, N., & Bullock, R. (2005). Child death and significant case reviews: International approaches. Dartington Social Research Unit.Google Scholar
  4. Berkowitz, C. D. (2008). Child abuse recognition and reporting: Supports and resources for changing the paradigm. Pediatrics, 122(Suppl 1), S10–S12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brandon, M., Dodsworth, J., & Rumball, D. (2005). Serious case reviews: Learning to use expertise. Child Abuse Review, 14(3), 160–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bunting, L., & Reid, C. (2005). Reviewing child deaths--Learning from the American experience. Child Abuse Review, 14(2), 82–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Child Welfare League of America, I. (2007). Eye on CWLA: Using the special review as a program improvement tool. Children’s Voice, September/October.Google Scholar
  8. Children Act, Great Britain, Her Majesty Government Stat. (2004).Google Scholar
  9. Children’s Health Alliance of Wisconsin. (2010). A window into prevention: An initial report on preventing child death & injury in Wisconsin. Retrieved January 4, 2015, from http://www.childdeathreview.org/Reports/WI_FullRpt2010.pdf
  10. Connolly, M., & Doolan, M. (2007). Responding to the deaths of children known to child protection agencies. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 30, 1–11.Google Scholar
  11. Covington, T., & Johnston, B. (2011). A misdirected assessment of progress in child death review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40(5), e31. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.01.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Covington, T. M. (2011). The US National Child Death review case reporting system. Injury Prevention: Journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention, 17(Suppl 1), i34–i37. doi: 10.1136/ip.2010.031203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Devaney, J., Lazenbatt, A., & Bunting, L. (2011). Inquiring into non-accidental child deaths: Reviewing the review process. British Journal of Social Work, 41(2), 242–260. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Douglas, E. M. (2005). Child maltreatment fatalities: What do we know, what have we done and where do we go from here? In K. Kendall-Tackett & S. Gaicomoni (Eds.), Child victimization (pp. 4.1–4.18). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.Google Scholar
  15. Douglas, E. M., & Cunningham, J. M. (2008). Recommendations from child fatality review teams: results of a US nationwide exploratory study concerning maltreatment fatalities and social service delivery. Child Abuse Review, 17(5), 331–351. doi: 10.1002/car.1044.
  16. Douglas, E. M., & McCarthy, S. C. (2011). Child fatality review teams: A content analysis of social policy. Child Welfare, 90(3), 91–110.Google Scholar
  17. Durfee, M., Durfee, D. T., & West, M. P. (2002). Child fatality review: An international movement. Child Abuse & Neglect, 26, 619–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Durfee, M., Parra, J. M., & Alexander, R. (2009). Child fatality review teams. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 56(2), 379–387. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2009.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Durfee, M. J., & Durfee, D. T. (1995). Multi-agency child death review teams: Experience in the United States. Child Abuse Review, 4, 377–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Durfee, M. J., Gellert, G. A., & Durfee, D. T. (1992). Origins and clinical relevance of child death review teams. JAMA, 267(23), 3172–3175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garstang, J., & Sidebotham, P. (2008). Interagency training: Establishing a course in the management of unexpected childhood death. Child Abuse Review, 17(5), 352–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gellert, G. A., Maxwell, R. M., Durfee, M. J., & Wagner, G. A. (1995). Fatalities assessed by the orange county child death review team, 1989 to 1991. Child Abuse & Neglect, 19(7), 875–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Göpfert, M. (2009). Guest Editorial: A message from Britain: Inquiries into child deaths – Will it ever change? Advances in Mental Health, 8(3), 227–230. doi: 10.5172/jamh.8.3.227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hassall, I. (2006). What is to be done about child homicide in New Zealand?Google Scholar
  25. Hochstadt, N. J. (2006). Child death review teams: A vital component of child protection. Child Welfare, 85(4), 653–670.Google Scholar
  26. Johnston, B. D., Bennett, E., Pilkey, D., Wirtz, S. J., & Quan, L. (2011). Collaborative process improvement to enhance injury prevention in child death review. Injury Prevention, 17, 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kellermann, A. L., Thomas, W., Henry, G., Wald, M., Fajman, N. N., & Carter, J. (1999). The best intentions: An evaluation of the child fatality review process in Georgia. Retrieved October 12, 2003, 2003, from http://www.sph.emory.edu/CIC/gafatality.html
  28. Kuijvenhoven, T., & Kortleven, W. J. (2010). Inquiries into fatal child abuse in the Netherlands: A source of improvement? British Journal of Social Work, 40(4), 1152–1173. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leeb, R. T., Paulozzi, L. J., Melanson, C., Simon, T. R., & Arias, I. (2008). Child maltreatment surveillance: Uniform definitions for public health and recommended data elements. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/cm_surveillance-a.pdf
  30. Luallen, J. J., Rochat, R. W., Smith, S. M., O’Neil, J., Rogers, M. Y., & Bolen, J. C. (1998). Child fatality review in Georgia: A young system demonstrates its potential for identifying preventable childhood deaths. South Medical Journal, 91(5), 414–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mansell, J., Ota, R., Erasmus, R., & Marks, K. (2011). Reframing child protection: A response to a constant crisis of confidence in child protection. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(11), 2076–2086. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.04.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mazzola, F., Mohiddin, A., Ward, M., & Holdsworth, G. (2013). How useful are child death reviews: A local area’s perspective. BMC Research Notes, 6(1), 295–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Munro, E. (2005). Improving practice: Child protection as a systems problem. Children and Youth Services Review, 27(4), 375–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Munro, E. M. (1999). Protecting children in an anxious society. Health, Risk & Society, 1(1), 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. National Center for the Review and Prevention of Child Deaths. (2010). The status of child death review in the United States in 2009. Updated July 2010.Google Scholar
  36. National Center for the Review and Prevention of Child Deaths. (n.d.-a). CDR reporting. Retrieved March 28, 2014, from http://www.childdeathreview.org/reporting.htm
  37. National Center for the Review and Prevention of Child Deaths. (n.d.-b). State spotlights. Retrieved March 4, 2014, from http://www.childdeathreview.org/state.htm
  38. Palusci, V. J., & Covington, T. M. (2014). Child maltreatment deaths in the U.S. National Child Death Review Case Reporting System. Child Abuse & Neglect, 38(1), 25–36. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.08.014.
  39. Palusci, V. J., Yager, S., & Covington, T. M. (2010). Effects of a Citizens Review Panel in preventing child maltreatment fatalities. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34(5), 324–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parton, N. (2002). Narrow, restrictive and reactive. Community Care, 1410, 24.Google Scholar
  41. Peddle, N., Wang, C.-T., Diaz, J., & Reid, R. (2002). Current trends in child abuse prevention and fatalities: The 2000 Fifty State Survey (Working paper no. 808). Retrieved September 1, 2008, from http://www.pcao.org/resources/pdfs/2000_50_survey.pdf
  42. Pennsylvania Bureau of Family Health. (2013). Pennsylvania child death review annual report. Retrieved January 4, 2015, from http://www.portal.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/gateway/PTARGS_0_75878_1403057_0_0_18/PA_CDR_2013_Annual_Report_Final_w_Errata_Edits.pdf
  43. Pollack, D. (2009). Child fatality review teams and the role of social workers: An international perspective. International Social Work, 52(2), 247–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Putnam-Hornstein, E., Wood, J. N., Fluke, J., Yoshioka-Maxwell, A., & Berger, R. P. (2013). Preventing severe and fatal child maltreatment: Making the case for the expanded use and integration of data. Child Welfare, 92(2), 59–75.Google Scholar
  45. Reder, P., & Duncan, S. (1998). A proposed system for reviewing child abuse deaths. Child Abuse Review, 7, 280–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reder, P., & Duncan, S. (1999). Lost innocents: A follow-up study of fatal child abuse. Florence, KY: Taylor & Frances/Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Reder, P., & Duncan, S. (2004). Making the most of the Victoria Climbié Inquiry Report. Child Abuse Review, 13(2), 95–114. doi: 10.1002/car.834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Reder, P., Duncan, S., & Gray, M. (1993). Beyond blame: Child abuse tragedies revisited. London, UK: Taylor & Frances/Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Riley, J. W. (1989). Child fatalities review process. Protecting Children, 6(1), 6–8.Google Scholar
  50. Schnitzer, P. G., Covington, T. M., Wirtz, S. J., Verhoek-Oftedahl, W., & Palusci, V. J. (2008). Public health surveillance of fatal child maltreatment: Analysis of 3 state programs. American Journal of Public Health, 98(2), 296–303. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2006.087783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schnitzer, P. G., Gulino, S. P., & Ying-Ying, T. Y. (2013). Advancing public health surveillance to estimate child maltreatment fatalities: Review and recommendations. Child Welfare, 92(2), 77–98.Google Scholar
  52. Shanley, J. R., Risch, E. C., & Bonner, B. L. (2010). U.S. child death review programs: Assessing progress toward a standard review process. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 39(6), 522–528. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.08.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sidebotham, P., Fox, J., Horwath, J., & Powell, C. (2011). Developing effective child death review: A study of ‘early starter’ child death overview panels in England. Injury Prevention: Journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention, 17(Suppl 1), i55–i63. doi: 10.1136/ip.2010.027169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stanley, N., & Manthorpe, J. (2004). The inquiry as Janus. In N. Stanley & J. Manthorpe (Eds.), The age of the inquiry. Learning and blaming in health and social care (pp. 1–16). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Texas Child Fatality Review Team. (2011). Texas child fatality review team report. Retrieved January 4, 2015, from http://www.childdeathreview.org/reports/TX_CFRAnnualReport2011.pdf
  56. Theiss-Nyland, K., & Rechel, B. (2013). Death reviews: Maternal, perinatal and child PMNCH knowledge summary (Vol. 27). Geneva, Switzerland: The Partnership for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health.Google Scholar
  57. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (n.d.). Healthy people 2020: Injury and violence prevention. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/objectiveslist.aspx?topicid=24
  58. Utah Department of Health. (2010). Child injury deaths in Utah, 2005–2007. Retrieved January 4, 2015, from http://www.health.utah.gov/vipp/pdf/ChildFatality/ChildInjuryDeathsReport.pdf
  59. Vincent, S. (2010). Preventing child deaths: Learning from review. Edinburgh, UK: Dunedin Academic Press Ltd.Google Scholar
  60. Ward Platt, M. (2014). Child death review five years on. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 99(3), 187–188. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Washington State Children’s Administration. (2008). Children’s administration executive child fatality review: Saranadee Leingang. Department of Social and Health Services. Retrieved from http://www.dshs.wa.gov/pdf/ca/LeingangECFR.pdf
  62. Webster, R. A., Schnitzer, P. G., Jenny, C., Ewigman, B. G., & Alario, A. J. (2003). Child death review: The state of the nation. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 25(5), 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wirtz, S. J., Foster, V., & Lenart, G. A. (2011). Assessing and improving child death review team recommendations. Injury Prevention, 17, 64–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emily M. Douglas
    • 1
  1. 1.Bridgewater State UniversityBridgewaterUSA

Personalised recommendations