Abstract
In the last 25 years, various genetically modified forest trees (GMTs) with modified or novel characteristics have been produced. Economic and ecological benefits like reduction of product costs and less pressure on native forests are expected but also risks like unintended spread of GMTs and pleiotropic effects of transferred genes are speculated by the opponents. This book summarizes a 4-years lasting COST Action on the biosafety of GMTs and focuses on the following four key aspects: (a) biological characterization of GMTs aiming to evaluate existing knowledge including the experience from expert scientists in the field of forest GMTs, (b) evaluation of the environmental impacts of the GMTs already developed, (c) assessments of the efficiency of existing transgene containment strategies, and (d) conduction of socio-economic and cost/benefit analyses in relation to the use of GMTs in plantations. This book combines multidisciplinary knowledge generated with transgenic lines of forest trees (such as, Populus spp., Pinus spp., Eucalyptus spp., Betula spp., Castanea spp., Picea spp., etc.) as well as extensive expertises in correlated topics. Moreover, considering the increase of public awareness on the use of GM forest plantations and environmental protection, the final part of the book focuses on communication about GMTs through science based information management of the http://www.cost-action-fp0905.eu dynamic website. This book aims to present useful information for the scientific community that is interested or engaged in socio-economic implications and biosafety issues of GMTs, but also to provide scientifically based support for decision processes of policy-makers and regulators.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahuja MR, Fladung M (2014) Integration and inheritance of transgenes in crop plants and trees. Tree Genet Genomes 10:779–790
Brunner AM, Li J, DiFazio SP, Shevchenko O, Mohamed R, Montgomery B, Elias A, Van Wormer K, Strauss SH (2007) Genetic containment of forest plantations. Tree Genet Genomes 3:75–100
Busov VB, Brunner AM, Meilan R, Filichkin S, Ganio L, Gandhi S, Strauss SH (2005) Genetic transformation: a powerful tool for dissection of adaptive traits in trees. New Phytol 167:9–18
El-Kassaby YA, Prado JA (2010) Forests and genetically modified trees. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome 235 pp
Ewald D, Hu JJ, Yang MS (2006) Transgenic forest trees in China. In: Fladung M, Ewald D (eds) Tree transgenesis: recent developments. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 25–45
Fladung M, Hoenicka H (2012) Fifteen years of forest tree biosafety research in Germany. iForest 5:126–130
Fladung M, Hoenicka H, Ahuja MR (2013) Genomic stability and long-term transgene expression in poplar. Transgenic Res 22:1167–1178
Gaj T, Gersbach CA, Barbas CF (2013) ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol 31:397–405
Gao L, Cao Y, Xia Z, Jiang G, Liu G, Zhang W, Zhai W (2013) Do transgenesis and marker-assisted backcross breeding produce substantially equivalent plants?-A comparative study of transgenic and backcross rice carrying bacterial blight resistant gene Xa21. BMC Genom 14:738
Häggman H, Sutela S, Walter C, Fladung M (2014) Biosafety considerations in the context of deployment of GE trees. In: Fenning T (ed) Challenges and opportunities for the world’s forests in the 21st century, Forestry sciences 81, Springer Science + Business Media Dordrecht, pp 491–524
Hirsch S (2015) Forest biotechnology and sustainability. In: Communication presented at the IUFRO tree biotechnology 2015 conference. Florence, Italy, 8–12 June 2015
Hoenicka H, Fladung M (2006a) Biosafety in Populus spp. and other forest trees: from non-native species to taxa derived from traditional breeding and genetic engineering. Trees 20:131–144
Hoenicka H, Fladung M (2006b) Faster evaluation of sterility strategies in transgenic early flowering poplar. Silvae Genetica 55:285–291
Institute of Forest Biotechnology (2011) Responsible use: biotech tree principles. A publication by the Institute of Forest Biotechnology. http://forestbio.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Responsible_Use_Biotech_Tree_Principles_v.P.1.0.B.pdf
Kaldorf M, Fladung M, Muhs HJ, Buscot F (2002) Mycorrhizal colonization of transgenic aspen in a field trial. Planta 214:653–660
Klocko A, Stanton B, van Oosten C, Strauss SH (2013) Green revolution plantations: could short trees be a big thing? ISB news report. May 2013, pp 7–9
Li J, Brunner AM, Meilan R, Strauss SH (2009) Stability of transgenes in trees: expression of two reporter genes in poplar over three field seasons. Tree Physiol 29:299–312
Metzdorff SB, Kok EJ, Knuthsen P, Pedersen J (2006) Evaluation of a non-targeted “omic” approach in the safety assessment of genetically modified plants. Plant Biol 8:662–672
Pasonen HL, Degefu Y, Brumós J, Lohtander K, Pappinen A, Timonen S, Seppänen SK (2005) Transgenic Betula pendula expressing sugar beet chitinase IV forms normal ectomycorrhizae with Paxillus involutus in vitro. Scand J Forest Res 20:385–392
Pilate G, Guiney E, Holt K, Petit-Conil M, Lapierre C, Leplé JC, Halpin C (2002) Field and pulping performances of transgenic trees with altered lignification. Nat Biotechnol 20:607–612
Ricroch AE (2013) Assessment of GE food safety using ‘-omics’ techniques and long-term animal feeding studies. New Biotechnol 30:349–354
Robischon M (2006) Field trials with transgenic trees. In: Fladung M, Ewald D (eds) Tree transgenesis: recent developments. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 3–23
Strauss SH, Brunner AM, Busov V, Ma C, Meilan R (2004) Ten lessons from 15 years of transgenic Populus research. Forestry 77:455–465
Strauss SH, Tan H, Boerjan W, Sedjo RA (2009) Strangled at birth? Forest biotech and the convention on biological diversity. Nat Biotechnol 27:519–527
Ulian E, Abrahão O (2015) Biosafety of a genetically modified Eucalyptus with yield enhancement characteristics. In: Communication presented at the IUFRO Tree Biotechnology 2015 conference. Florence, Italy, 8–12 June 2015
Valenzuela S, Balocchi C, Rodríguez J (2006) Transgenic trees and forestry biosafety. Electron J Biotechnol (online), 9
Walter C, Fladung M, Boerjan W (2010) The 20-year environmental safety record of GM trees. Nat Biotechnol 28:656–658
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vettori, C., Fladung, M. (2016). Introduction. In: Vettori, C., et al. Biosafety of Forest Transgenic Trees. Forestry Sciences, vol 82. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7531-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7531-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-7529-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-7531-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)