Abstract
Payment for environmental services is intended to ensure better management of natural resources while contributing to economic development and ecosystem protection. This policy instrument is based on economic incentives to offset the opportunity costs of environmental service providers. Hence, it links providers and users of environmental services and acts as a powerful catalyst for collective action. In this chapter, we discuss the economic principles underlying the instrument and its modes of governance, and we present some innovative examples. We show that by maintaining ecosystems and associated ecosystem services, the practices favoured by these payments contribute directly and indirectly to climate change adaptation or mitigation policies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation.
- 2.
With a seedling survival rate ranging from 20 to 90 % (Xu et al. 2010).
References
Arriagada RA, Ferraro PJ, Sills EO, Pattanayak SK, Cordero-Sancho S (2012) Do payments for environmental services affect forest cover? A farm-level evaluation from Costa Rica. Land Econ 88(2):382–399
Asquith NM, Vargas MT, Wunder S (2008) Selling two environmental services: in-kind payments for bird habitat and watershed protection in Los Negros, Bolivia. Ecol Econ 65:675–684
Claassen R, Cattaneo A, Johansson R (2008) Cost-effective design of agri-environmental payment programs: US experience in theory and practice. Ecol Econ 65:737–752
Engel S, Pagiola S, Wunder S (2008) Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecol Econ 65:663–674
Ezzine-de-Blas D, Börner J, Violato-Espada AL, Nascimento N, Piketty MG (2011) Forest loss and management in land reform settlements: implications for REDD governance in the Brazilian Amazon. Environ Sci Policy 14(2):188–200
Ezzine-de-Blas D, Wunder S, Ruiz-Pérez M, Moreno R (2014) A scale of greys: global patterns of PES implementation. In: Congrès de la Société internationale en économie écologique, 13-15 août, Reykjavik, Islande
Froger G, Ménard S, Méral P (2015) Towards a comparative and critical analysis of biodiversity banks. Ecosystem Services, sous presse
Frost PGH, Bond I (2008) The CAMPFIRE programme in Zimbabwe: payments for wildlife services. Ecol Econ 65:776–787
García-Amado L, Ruiz-Pérez M, Barrasa-García S (2013) Motivation for conservation: assessing integrated conservation and development projects and payments for environmental services in La Sepultura Biosphere Reserve, Chiapas, Mexico. Ecol Econ 89:92–100
Gregersen H, Lakany H, Karsenty A, White A (2010) Does the opportunity cost approach indicate the real cost of REDD+? Rights and realities of paying for REDD+. Rights and Resources Initiative/Cirad, http://www.rightsandresources.org/documents/files/doc_1555.pdf
Grolleau G, McCann L (2012) Designing watershed programs to pay farmers for water quality services: case studies of Munich and New York City. Ecol Econ 76:87–94
Hrabanski M (2014) The success of biodiversity offsets as market based instruments: origins, diffusion and controversies. Ecosystem Services, sous presse
Karsenty A, Ezzine-de-Blas D (2014) Du mésusage des métaphores. Les paiements pour services environnementaux sont-ils des instruments de marchandisation de la nature ? In : L’instrumentation de l’action publique. Controverses, résistances, effets (C Halpern, P Lascoumes, P Le Galès, eds), Presses de Sciences Po 161–189
Karsenty A, Guingand A, Langlais A, Polge MC (2014) Comment articuler les Paiements pour services environnementaux aux autres instruments politiques et économiques dans les pays du Sud et du Nord ? Synthèse des débats de l’atelier CDC-Biodiversité, juin 2014. Cirad, Montpellier
Lapeyre R, Froger G, Hrabanski M (2014) Biodiversity offsets as MBIs? From discourses to practice. Introduction. Ecosystem Services, sous presse
Le Coq J-F, Pesche D, Legrand T, Froger G, Saenz Segura F (2012) La mise en politique des services environnementaux: la genèse du Programme de paiements pour services environnementaux au Costa Rica. VertigO—La revue en sciences de l’environnement 12 (3)
Legrand T, Froger G, Le Coq J-F (2013) Institutional performance of payments for environmental services: an analysis of the Costa Rican program. Forest Policy Econ 37:115–123
Muradian R (2013) Payments for ecosystem services as incentives for collective action. Soc Nat Res 26(10):1155–1169
Narloch U, Pascual U, Drucker AG (2011) Cost-effectiveness targeting under multiple conservation goals and equity considerations in the Andes. Environ Conserv 38(4):417–425
Pagiola S, Platais G (2007) Payments for environmental services: from theory to practice. World Bank, Washington
Simonet G, Seyller C (2013) Les projets REDD+ et leurs modèles économiques. In: Conférence Cirad-GRET-Les amis de la Terre, 17 juin, Jardin tropical de Paris, France
van de Sand I (2012) Payments for ecosystem services in the context of adaptation to climate change. Ecol Soc 17(1):11
Xu J, Tao R, Xu Z, Bennett MT (2010) China’s sloping land conversion program: does expansion equal success? Land Econ 86(2):219–244
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Éditions Quæ
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Hrabanski, M., Le Coq, JF. (2016). Payment for Environmental Services in Climate Change Policies. In: Torquebiau, E. (eds) Climate Change and Agriculture Worldwide. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7462-8_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7462-8_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-7460-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-7462-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)