Skip to main content

Addressing Weak Legal Protection of Wilderness: Deliberate Choices and Drawing Lines on the Map

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mapping Wilderness
  • 851 Accesses

Abstract

Wilderness areas are characterized by a relatively high degree of naturalness, the absence of proof of modern human society (e.g. roads, buildings, bridges, motorized transportation) and a relatively large size (Dudley, N. (Ed.). (2008). Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. Gland: IUCN. Available at: http://data.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/2008-028.pdf). Worldwide, wilderness areas are becoming more scarce and this chapter focuses on the role of law in protecting such areas. The discussion starts with an analysis of the historic human-nature attitude in Western society and how this attitude has influenced legal concepts regarding private property on land and territorial sovereignty. It will be shown that these concepts have stimulated active land transformation by humankind and that (as a consequence) wilderness protection is not embedded in our Western legal roots. Next, the discussion focuses on the response to the increasing awareness of the downside of modern human civilization: a changing human-nature attitude in the Nineteenth Century and the adoption of a large number of international nature protection conventions in the Twentieth Century. However, all this ‘law making’ has not resulted in comprehensive wilderness protection at the global or regional level, which may be explained by a number of important weaknesses in these conventions and their implementation. Probably, many of these weaknesses have much to do with weaknesses of humankind itself, such as the difficulty to accept limitations to our social and economic ambitions and our disability to deal with accumulative impacts. Against the background of these discussions, the final part of this chapter discusses options for strengthening wilderness protection with an emphasis on the importance of making deliberate policy choices to protect wilderness.

This chapter builds on Kees Bastmeijer, Introduction: An international history of wilderness protection and central aim of this book. In: Wilderness Protection in Europe. The Role of International, European and National Law, Cambridge University Press, 2016.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aristotle. (350 b.c). The politics, A treatise on government. translation from the Greek original by William Ellis, London & Toronto: J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd./New York: E.P. Duton &. Co, first issue in 1912, reprinted in 1919, 1923, 1928. Available at: www.gutenberg.org/files/6762/6763-h/6762-h.htm

  • Baakman, K. (2011). Testing times: The effectiveness of five international biodiversity-related conventions. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balch, T. W. (1910). The arctic and Antarctic regions and the law of nations. American Journal of International Law, 4, 265–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastmeijer, C. J. (2009). Protecting polar wilderness: Just a western philosophical idea or a useful concept for regulating human activities in the polar regions? In G. Alfredsson, T. Koivurova, & D. Leary (Eds.), The yearbook of polar law (Vol. 1, pp. 73–99). Boston/Leiden: Brill/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1295430

  • Bastmeijer. C. J., & Roura, R. (2008). Environmental impact assessment in Antarctica. In C. J. Bastmeijer, & T. Koivurova (Eds.), Theory and practice of transboundary environmental impact assessment (pp. 175–219). Leiden: Brill/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1297285

  • Bastmeijer, K. (2016). Introduction: An international history of wilderness protection and central aim of this book. In K. Bastmeijer (Ed.), Wilderness protection in Europe. The role of international, European and national law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. A., Henry, J. F., & Randall Wray, L. (2004). A chartalist critique of John Locke’s theory of property, accumulation, and money: Or, is it moral to trade your nuts for gold? Review of Social Economy, 62(1), 51–65. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/0034676042000183826

  • Birnie, P., Boyle, A., & Redgewell, C. (2009). International law & the environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowland, M. J. (1988–1989). The protection of animals under international law. Connecticut Journal of International Law, 4, 487–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caddell, R. (2005). International law and the protection of migratory wildlife: An appraisal of twenty-five years of the Bonn convention. Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law & Policy, 16(113), 113–156. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/colenvlp16&div=10&id=&page

  • Carver, S. (2016). Mapping wilderness in Europe. In K. Bastmeijer (Ed.), Wilderness protection in Europe: The role of international, European and national law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, S., & Tin, T. (2013). Mapping and modelling wilderness values in Antarctica. Leeds: Wildland Research Institute, University of Leeds. Available at http://www.ats.aq/documents/ATCM36/att/ATCM36_att116_e.pdf

  • CEP. (2004). Report of the VIIth meeting of the CEP, Cape Town. Available at: http://cep.ats.aq/cep/MediaItems/atcm27_cepvii_e.pdf

  • Cliteur, P. (2001). Darwin, Dier en Recht. Essay available at: http://media.leidenuniv.nl/legacy/Darwin%20%20dier%20en%20recht.pdf

  • Cliteur, P. (2005). De filosofie van dierenrechten. In J. Braeckman, B. de Reuver, & T. Vervisch (Eds.), Ethiek van DNA tot 9/11 (pp. 135–159). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Available at: http://media.leidenuniv.nl/legacy/De%20filosofie%20van%20de%20dierenrechten.pdf

  • COMNAP. (2013). Main Antarctic facilities operated by the National Antarctic programs in the Antarctic treaty area. Available at: https://comnap.aq/Members/Shared%20Documents/Antarctic_Facilities_list_15May2013.xls

  • Cronon, W. (1995). The trouble with wilderness; or, getting back to the wrong nature. In W. Cronon (Ed.), Uncommon ground: Rethinking the human place in nature. New York: W.W. Norton & Co. Available at http://www.warren-wilson.edu/~ghawkins/radical/docs/Cronon_Trouble_w_Wilderness.pdf

  • Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. (2010). Verbinden als sociaal dilemma. Idee, 31, 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vattel, E. (1758). Le Droit des gens (Quotations taken from the English translation by Joseph Chitty (1867): The Law of Nations). Philadelphia: Johnson & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearden, P. (1989). Wilderness and our common future. Natural Resources Journal, 29, 205–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deinet, S., Ieronymidou, C., McRae, L., Burfield, I. J., Foppen, R. P., Collen, B., & Böhm, M. (2013). Wildlife comeback in Europe: The recovery of selected mammal and bird species. Final report to Rewilding Europe by ZSL, BirdLife International and the European Bird Census Council. London: ZSL. Available at: http://static.zsl.org/files/wildlife-comeback-in-europe-the-recovery-of-selected-mammal-and-bird-species-2576.pdf

  • DeMello, M. (2012). Animals and society. An introduction to human-nature studies. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doremus, H. (1999). The special importance of ordinary places. Environmental Law & Policy Journal, 23(3). Available at http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/facpubs/511

  • Dudley, N. (Ed.). (2008). Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. Gland: IUCN. Available at: http://data.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/2008-028.pdf

  • Fisher, M. (2016). Ecological values of wilderness in Europe. In K. Bastmeijer (Ed.), Wilderness protection in Europe: The role of international, European and national law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francioni, F. (1994). Liability for damage to the common environment: The case of Antarctica. RECIEL, 3, 223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodricht, G. (1951). The United Nations conference on resources. International Organization, 5(1), 48–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorter, H. P. (1956). Fifty years ‘Natuurmonumenten’ (nature reserves). In Vijftig jaar natuurbescherming in Nederland (pp. 11–66). Amsterdam: Drukkerij De Volharding. Commemorative book on the occasion of the fiftieth anniversary of the Society for the Protection of Nature (in the Netherlands).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grotius, H. (1609). Mare Liberum, The Freedom of the Seas (Translated with a revision of the Latin text of 1633 by Van Deman Magoffin, R. (1916)). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, T. H. (1863). Evidence as to man’s place in nature. New York: D. Appleton and Company. Also available at https://archive.org/details/evidenceastomans00huxl

  • IUCN. (2004). International environmental governance: An international regime for protected areas. Gland: IUCN Environmental Policy and Law Paper 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, M. I. (2004). An international legal regime for protected areas. In John Scanlon, & Burhenn-Guilmin (Ed.), International environmental governance (pp. 9–40). Gland: IUCN. Available at https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/EPLP-049.pdf

  • King Hubbert, M. (1969). Energy Resources. In National Research Council – Division of Earth Sciences – Committee of Resources and Man. Resources and man (Vol. 238). San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koester, V. (2012). Book review of Baakman’s ‘testing times: The effectiveness of five international biodiversity-related conventions’. RECIEL, 21(1), 67–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kormos, C. F., & Locke, H. (2008). Introduction. In C. F. Kormos (Ed.), A handbook on international wilderness law and policy. Colorado: Fulcrum Publishing, Golden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuiters, A. T. et al. (2012). Guidelines for the management of wilderness and wild areas in Natura 2000. Brussels: European Commission. Available at: http://portal.icnb.pt/NR/rdonlyres/773250A6-7A20-4F4E-A944-255E90D82E73/0/GuidelinesWilderness_2012.pdf

  • Linklater, A. (2013). Owning the earth: The transforming history of land ownership. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1690). The second treatise of government. Available at: http://libertyonline.hypermall.com/Locke/second/second-frame.html

  • Lowenthal, D. (2000). Nature and morality from George Perkins Marsh to the millennium. Journal of Historical Geography, 26(1), 3–27. Available at: http://geography.fullerton.edu/taylor/ENST595T/Lowenthal_JHG.pdf

  • Macnab, R. (2009). “Use it or lose it” in Arctic Canada: Action agenda or election hype? Vermont Law Review, 34, 2–14. Available at http://lawreview.vermontlaw.edu/files/2012/02/macnab.pdf

  • MacPherson, C. B. (1962). The political theory of possessive individualism – Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, G. P. (1867). Preface of man and nature. New York: Charles Scribner & Co. Available at http://www.gutenberg.org/files/37957/37957-h/37957-h.htm

  • Minteer B. A., Manning R. E. (2005). An appraisal of the critique of anthropocentrism and three lesser known themes in Lynn White’s “The historical roots of our ecological crisis”. Organization & Environment 18(2005), 163–176 Also available at: https://www.uvm.edu/parkstudieslaboratory/publications/Appraisal_Critique_Anthropocentrism.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgera, E., & Tsioumani, E. (2011). Yesterday, today and tomorrow: Looking afresh at the convention on biological diversity (University of Edinburgh School of Law Working Paper No. 2011/21). Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1914378

  • Nash, R. F. (2001). Wilderness & the American mind (4th ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passmore, J. (1974/1980). Man’s responsibility for nature. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. W., Markandya, A., & Barbier, E. (Eds.). (1989). Blueprint for a green economy (Vol. 1). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, N. (1996). The human transformation of the earth’s surface. International Social Science Journal, 150, 493–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sands, P. (1995). Principles of international environmental law. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrijver, N. (2008). The evolution of sustainable development in international law: Inception, meaning and status, pocketbook of the Hague Academy of International Law. Leiden/Bosten: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrijver, N., & Prislan, V. (2009). From Mare Liberum to the global commons: Building on the Grotian heritage. Grotiana, 30, 168–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. (2010). Global biodiversity outlook 3. Montréal. Available at: http://www.cbd.int/doc/publications/gbo/gbo3-final-en.pdf

  • Smith, A. (1759). Glasgow edition of the works and correspondence, Vol. 1 The theory of moral sentiments. In D. D. Raphael, & A. L. Macfie (Eds.), (1982). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Available at: http://files.libertyfund.org/files/192/Smith_0141-01_EBk_v6.0.pdf

  • Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations (S. M. Soares, Ed.). (2007). MetaLibri Digital Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, D. C. (2007). Locke on natural law and property rights. In T. Brooks (Ed.), Locke and law, philosophers and law series (pp. 3–30). Hampshire: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summerson, R. (2012). Protection of wilderness and aesthetic values in Antarctica. In F. Huettmann (Ed.), Protection of the three poles (pp. 77–109). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K. (1983). Man and the natural world, changing attitudes in England (1500–1800). Harmondsworth/Middlesex: Allen Lane/Penguin Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tickell, C. (1993). The human species: A suicidal success? The Geographical Journal, 159(2), 219–226. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3451413

    Google Scholar 

  • Tin, T., & Summerson, R. (2009). Wilderniss and aesthetic values in Antartica. Map presented by ASOC at the ATCM XXXII.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trouwborst, A. (2008). Seabird Bycatch – Deathbed conservation or a precautionary and holistic approach? Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy, 11(4), 293–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Heerikhuizen, B., (2012). An academic lecture on Adam Smith and Bernard de Mandeville, Available at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8wMy1JvSsY

  • Van Heijnsbergen, P. (1997). International legal protection of flora and fauna. Amsterdam: Ios Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. (1899). The theory of the leisure class. An economic study of institutions. New York: Macmillan Company. (1909 ed. freely available at http://www.gutenberg.org/files/833/833-h/833-h.htm)

  • Verbeek, T. H. M. (2007). Mechanistische filosofie: Descartes en Spinoza. [Online] Available at: http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/sg/2007-1115-200507/3-mechanis.pdf

  • Vöneky, S. (2008). The liability annex to the protocol on environmental protection to the Antarctic treaty. In D. König, P. T. Stoll,, V. Röben, & N. Matz-Lück (Eds.), International law today: New challenges and the need for reform? Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer. Available at: http://www.mpil.de/shared/data/pdf/text_liabilityannex_voeneky.pdf

  • Wells, S. (2010). Pandora’s seed: The unforeseen cost of civilization. New York: Random House Publishers. Translated into Dutch as De akkers van Pandora. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Contact 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • White Jr., L. (1967). The historical roots of our ecological crisis. Science, 155(3767). 1203–1207. Available at http://www.drexel.edu/~/media/Files/greatworks/pdf_fall09/HistoricalRoots_of_EcologicalCrisis.ashx

    Google Scholar 

  • Wild Europe Initiative. (2013). A working definition of European wilderness and wild areas. Available at: http://www.wildeurope.org/images/pdf/a-working-definition-of-european-wilderness-and-wild-areas.pdf

  • World Resources Institute. (2005). Millennium ecosystem assessment. Washington, DC: Synthesis. Available at: www.maweb.org/documents/document.297.aspx.pdf

  • Zweers, W. (1995). Participeren aan de natuur; ontwerp voor een ecologisering van het wereldbeeld. Amsterdam: Jan van Arkel.

    Google Scholar 

Law References

Download references

Acknowledgement

The author would like to thank Tim van der Putten for his proofreading and editorial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kees Bastmeijer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bastmeijer, K. (2016). Addressing Weak Legal Protection of Wilderness: Deliberate Choices and Drawing Lines on the Map. In: Carver, S., Fritz, S. (eds) Mapping Wilderness. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7399-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics