Abstract
This book uses neonatal intensive care as an example of the complex decisions that must be made as we try to harness ambiguous technology to human ends. The answers that we have come to about decisions in the NICU are not settled or final. The process of coming to moral consensus is iterative, non-linear, and ongoing. Scientific discoveries change the way we think about what it means to be human and what it means to live in community. Each story of scientific discovery and innovation is a story of the struggle to find the balance between the new emerging possibilities for human flourishing, and the risks and dangers that are held within it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Wilson AL, Munson DP, Schubot DB, Leonardson G, Stevens DC. Does prenatal care decrease the incidence and cost of neonatal intensive care admissions? Am J Perinatol. 1992;9:281–4.
Gorsky RD, Colby JP Jr. The cost effectiveness of prenatal care in reducing low birth weight in New Hampshire. Health Serv Res. 1989;24:583–98.
Sinclair JC, Torrance GW, Boyle MH, Horwood SP, Saigal S, Sackett DL. Evaluation of neonatal-intensive-care programs. N Engl J Med. 1981;305:489–94.
Silverman WA. Neonatal pediatrics at the century mark. Per Biol Med. 1989;32:159–69.
Kliegman RM. Neonatal technology, perinatal survival, social consequences, and the perinatal paradox. Am J Public Health. 1995;85(7):909–13.
Huntington J, Connell FA. For every dollar spent—the cost-savings argument for prenatal care. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1303–7.
McCormick RA. The quality of life, the sanctity of life. Hast Ctr Rep. 1978;8(1):30–6.
Koop CE. The slide to Auschwitz. The Pro-Life Forum. Accessed at http://www.prolifeforum.org/ethics/everett.asp on 14 July 2004.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lantos, J. (2016). Making Tough Ethical Choices in a Morally Pluralistic World. In: Verhagen, E., Janvier, A. (eds) Ethical Dilemmas for Critically Ill Babies. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 65. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7360-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7360-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-7359-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-7360-7
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)