Skip to main content

Making Tough Ethical Choices in a Morally Pluralistic World

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethical Dilemmas for Critically Ill Babies

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 65))

  • 506 Accesses

Abstract

This book uses neonatal intensive care as an example of the complex decisions that must be made as we try to harness ambiguous technology to human ends. The answers that we have come to about decisions in the NICU are not settled or final. The process of coming to moral consensus is iterative, non-linear, and ongoing. Scientific discoveries change the way we think about what it means to be human and what it means to live in community. Each story of scientific discovery and innovation is a story of the struggle to find the balance between the new emerging possibilities for human flourishing, and the risks and dangers that are held within it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wilson AL, Munson DP, Schubot DB, Leonardson G, Stevens DC. Does prenatal care decrease the incidence and cost of neonatal intensive care admissions? Am J Perinatol. 1992;9:281–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gorsky RD, Colby JP Jr. The cost effectiveness of prenatal care in reducing low birth weight in New Hampshire. Health Serv Res. 1989;24:583–98.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sinclair JC, Torrance GW, Boyle MH, Horwood SP, Saigal S, Sackett DL. Evaluation of neonatal-intensive-care programs. N Engl J Med. 1981;305:489–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Silverman WA. Neonatal pediatrics at the century mark. Per Biol Med. 1989;32:159–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kliegman RM. Neonatal technology, perinatal survival, social consequences, and the perinatal paradox. Am J Public Health. 1995;85(7):909–13.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huntington J, Connell FA. For every dollar spent—the cost-savings argument for prenatal care. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1303–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McCormick RA. The quality of life, the sanctity of life. Hast Ctr Rep. 1978;8(1):30–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Koop CE. The slide to Auschwitz. The Pro-Life Forum. Accessed at http://www.prolifeforum.org/ethics/everett.asp on 14 July 2004.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Lantos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lantos, J. (2016). Making Tough Ethical Choices in a Morally Pluralistic World. In: Verhagen, E., Janvier, A. (eds) Ethical Dilemmas for Critically Ill Babies. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 65. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7360-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics