Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter contains a description of the framing process in the ethical decision-making methodology. Before attempting to handle questions of ethics, a scenario must be deconstructed into component pieces. Facts, concepts, and morals are defined and discerned from like objects that contain some degree of ambiguity (known as factual issues, conceptual issues, and moral issues). Gaps in these components are filled with assumptions, an important but often insidious part of the decision process. Finally, process can continue iteratively until stopped by the decision-maker.

If while traveling in a mountain range you notice that the apparent relative height of mountain peaks varies with your vantage point, you will conclude that some impressions of relative height must be erroneous, even when you have no access to the correct answer. Similarly, one may discover that the relative attractiveness of options varies when the same decision problem is framed in different ways... The susceptibility to perspective effects is of special concern in the domain of decision-making because of the absence of objective standards such as the true height of mountains.”

-Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky (1981)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Code, L. (1991). What can she know: Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, T. B., Chatterjee, S., & France, K. R. (1995). Mental accounting and changes in price: The frame dependence of reference dependence. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 90–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1325–1348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschenbaum, H. (1992). A comprehensive model for values education and moral education. The Phi Delta Kappan, 73(10), 771–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L., & Hersh, R. H. (1977). Moral development: A review of the theory. Theory Into Practice, 16(2), 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCaffery, E. J., & Baron, J. (2004). Framing and taxation: Evaluation of tax policies involving household composition. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(6), 679–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, J. (2006). Life of Adam Smith. New York: Cosimo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rand, A. (1992). Atlas shrugged (35th Anniversary Edition). New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. C. (1981). Economic reasoning and the ethics of policy. The Public Interest, 63, 37–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1997). The theory of moral sentiments. Washington, DC: Regenery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2010). Mismeasuring our lives: Why GDP doesn’t add up. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1(1), 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59, S251–S278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039–1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth A. M. Searing PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Searing, E.A.M., Searing, D.R. (2016). Framing the Problem. In: Searing, E., Searing, D. (eds) Practicing Professional Ethics in Economics and Public Policy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7306-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics