Skip to main content

Justice and Sustainability

  • Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the relationships between justice and sustainability theory and argues that despite being entwined, practical and theoretical challenges prevent an easy or complete integration of these two concepts. Specifically, we examine how the multiscalar, multigenerational, and multidimensional characteristics of sustainability interact with ideas of just processes or just outcomes. Using insights from justice theory, sustainability science, and the social psychology of justice, we suggest we ask questions like: what would a just multiscalar and multigenerational sustainability process look like? If social context changes how people use or understand ideas of justice, what should justice look like in complex sustainability challenges that extend across traditional boundaries? We suggest that although these issues present persistent theoretical challenges, past and ongoing efforts – such as environmental justice work or international climate negotiations – provide some lessons and guidance about strategies for assisting this integration in practice. Overall this chapter suggests that although fully integrating justice and sustainability may not be entirely possible, sustainability without a consideration of justice would be nonsensical from a normative perspective and difficult to achieve strategically. This leaves us with a strong rationale to insist on the centrality of justice in any sustainability effort, but with an awareness of the complexities of doing so.

Keywords

  • Justice
  • Sustainability
  • Procedural justice
  • Just outcomes
  • Social psychology of justice

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-7242-6_14
  • Chapter length: 13 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-94-017-7242-6
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Further Reading

  • Agyeman J, Bullard R, Evans B (2003) Just sustainabilities: development in an unequal world. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson A (1999) Fairness and futurity: essays on environmental sustainability and social justice. Oxford University Press, New York

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser N (2009) Scales of justice: reimagining political space in a globalizing world. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutz KM, Bryner GC, Kenney DS (eds) (2002) Justice and natural resources: concepts, strategies, and applications. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Asheim GB, Mitra T (2010) Sustainability and utilitarianism in discounted models of economic growth. Math Soc Sci 59(2):148–169

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Baer P, Athanasiou T, Kartha S, Kemp-Benedict E (2009) Greenhouse development rights: a proposal for a fair Global Climate Treaty. Ethics Place Environ 12(3):267–281. doi:10.1080/13668790903195495

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington J (2000) Sustainable development: a review of the international development, business and accounting literature. Aberdeen papers in accountancy, finance & management working paper 00–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman W (1999) Sustainable development and our obligations to future generations. In: Dobson A (ed) Fairness and futurity: essays on environmental sustainability and social justice. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 71–92

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland GH (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryner G (2002) Assessing claims of environmental justice. In: Mutz KM, Bryner GC, Kenney DS (eds) Justice and natural resources: concepts, strategies, and applications. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard RD (1983) Solid waste sites and the black Houston community. Sociol Inq 53:273–273

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Clinton WJ (1994) Federal actions to address environmental justice in minority populations and low-income populations, Executive Order 12898 of February 11, 1994. Fed Regist 59:7629–7633

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole DH (2008) The Stern review and its critics: implications for the theory and practice of benefit-cost analysis. Nat Resour J 48:53

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch M (1975) Equity, equality, and need: what determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? J Soc Issues 31(3):137–149. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb01000.x

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Endress L, Pongkijvorasin S, Roumasset J, Pitafi B (2009) Impatience and intergenerational equity in a model of sustainable growth. Working paper no. 09–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Fainstein S (2010) The just city. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer F (2000) Citizens, experts, and the environment: the politics of local knowledge. Duke University Press, Durham

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff B (1991) Value elicitation: is there anything in there? Am Psychol 46(8):835–847. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.46.8.835

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske AP, Tetlock PE (1997) Taboo trade-offs: reactions to transactions that transgress the spheres of justice. Pol Psychol 18(2):255–297. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00058

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner S, Caney S, Jamieson D, Shue H (eds) (2010) Climate ethics: essential readings. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels FW (2010) Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Res Policy 39(4):495–510. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson RB (2006) Beyond the pillars: sustainability assessment as a framework for effective integration of social, economic and ecological considerations in significant decision-making. J Environ Assess Policy Manag 08(03):259–280. doi:10.1142/S1464333206002517

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Golub A, Mahoney M, Harlow J (2013) Sustainability and intergenerational equity: do past injustices matter? Sustain Sci 8(2):269–277

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory R, Lichtenstein S, Slovic P (1993) Valuing environmental resources: a constructive approach. J Risk Uncertain 7(2):177–197. doi:10.1007/BF01065813

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Harlow J, Golub A, Allenby B (2011) An exploration of Utopian themes in sustainable development discourse. Sustain Dev 21(4):270–280

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Howarth RB (2003) Discounting and uncertainty in climate change policy analysis. Land Econ 79(3):369–381. doi:10.3368/le.79.3.369

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jerneck A, Olsson L, Ness B, Anderberg S, Baier M, Clark E, Hickler T, Hornborg A, Kronsell A, Lovbrand E, Persson J (2011) Structuring sustainability science. Sustain Sci 6(1):69–82

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kates RW, Parris TM, Leiserowitz AA (2005) Sustainability science. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 47(3):8–21

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Klinsky S, Dowlatabadi H, McDaniels T (2012) Comparing public rationales for justice trade-offs in mitigation and adaptation climate policy dilemmas. Glob Environ Chang 22(4):862–876. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.05.008

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lee BL (1997) Civil rights and legal remedies: a plan of action. In: Bullard R, Johnson G (eds) Just transportation: dismantling race and class barrier to mobility. New Society Publishers, Connecticut, pp 156–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindseth G (2006) Scalar strategies in climate-change politics: debating the environmental consequences of a natural gas project. Environ Plan C Gov Policy 24(5):739–754. doi:10.1068/c0513j

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mikula G, Wenzel M (2000) Justice and social conflict. Int J Psychol 35(2):126–135. doi:10.1080/002075900399420

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Miller D (2002) Debate – Caney’s ‘International distributive justice’: a response. Polit Stud 50(5):974–977

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller D (2005) Against global egalitarianism. In: Brock G, Moellendorf D (eds) Current debates in global justice. Springer, Netherlands, pp 55–79

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Miller TR, Wiek A, Sarewitz D, Robinson J, Olsson L, Kriebel D, Loorbach D (2014) The future of sustainability science: a solutions-oriented research agenda. Sustain Sci 9(2):239–246

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nozick R (1974) Anarchy, state, and utopia. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott HE, Winkler H, Brouns B, Kartha S, Mace M, Huq S, Rahman A (2004) South-North dialogue on equity in the greenhouse: a proposal for an adequate and equitable global climate agreement. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ). Retrieved from http://www.erc.uct.ac.za/Research/publications/04Ott-etal-SouthNorthDiaLogue.pdf

  • Sassen S, Dotan N (2011) Delegating, not returning, to the biosphere: how to use the multi-scalar and ecological properties of cities. Glob Environ Chang 21(3):823–834. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.018

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Smith A, Voß J-P, Grin J (2010) Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: the allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Res Policy 39(4):435–448. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Trappenburg M (2000) In defense of pure pluralism: two readings of Walzer’s spheres of justice. J Polit Philos 8:343–362

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. General Accounting Office (USGAO) (1983) Siting of hazardous waste landfills and their correlation with the racial and socio-economic status of surrounding communities. General Accounting Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • United Church of Christ (1987) Toxic wastes and race in the United States. United Church of Christ, New York. http://www.ucc.org/about-us/archives/pdfs/toxwrace87.pdf

  • Walzer M (1983) Spheres of justice: a defense of pluralism and equality. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel M (2004) Social identification as a determinant of concerns about individual-, group-, and inclusive-level justice. Soc Psychol Q 67(1):70–87. doi:10.1177/019027250406700107

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wiek A, Ness B, Brand FS, Schweizer-Ries P, Farioli F (2012) From complex systems analysis to transformational change: a comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects. Sustain Sci 7(Supplement 1):5–24

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wilbanks TJ (2002) Geographic scaling issues in integrated assessments of climate change. Integr Assess 3(2–3):100–114. doi:10.1076/iaij.3.2.100.13575

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler H, Jayaraman T, Pan J, Santihago de Oliveira A, Zhang Y, Sant G, … Raubenheimer S (2011) Equitable access to sustainable development: a paper by experts from BASIC countries. BASIC Expert Group, Beijing/Brasilia/Cape Town/Mumbai

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolsink M (2007) Wind power implementation: the nature of public attitudes: equity and fairness instead of “backyard motives”. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 11(6):1188–1207. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2005.10.005

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Yabareen J (2008) A new conceptual framework for sustainable development. Environ Dev Sustain 10:179–192

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonja Klinsky .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klinsky, S., Golub, A. (2016). Justice and Sustainability. In: Heinrichs, H., Martens, P., Michelsen, G., Wiek, A. (eds) Sustainability Science. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7242-6_14

Download citation