Advertisement

The Primacy of Movement in Research-Creation: New Materialist Approaches to Art Research and Pedagogy

  • Sarah E. TrumanEmail author
  • Stephanie Springgay
Part of the Contemporary Philosophies and Theories in Education book series (COPT, volume 8)

Abstract

The Pedagogical Impulse (TPI) was a 3-year research-creation project that initiated a series of artist-residencies across a variety of educational sites in Toronto, Canada. In this chapter we examine the primacy of movement as a proposition of research-creation through a ‘case study’ of one of TPI’s artist-residencies in a secondary school and argue that movement is germane to emerging post-humanist explorations within educational research, and a crucial component for re-imagining research-creation methodologies.

Keywords

Swarm Intelligence Cultural Production Absolute Movement Educational Site Pure Difference 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe half way: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett, E., & Bolt, B. (Eds.). (2013). Carnal knowledge: Towards a ‘new materialism’ through the arts. New York: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  4. Braidotti, R. (2005). Politics + Ecology. In P. Adrian (Ed.), The Deleuze dictionary. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  6. Coleman, R., & Ringrose, J. (Eds.). (2013). Deleuze and research methodologies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Coole, D., & Frost, S. (Eds.). (2010). New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cull, L. (2009). Deleuze and performance. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Deleuze, G. (1986). Cinema 1: The movement-image. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
  10. Deleuze, G. (1987). Dialgoues (with Claire Parnet). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Deleuze, G. (2006). Nietzsche and philosophy. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  12. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  13. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Garoian, C. R. (2012). Sustaining sustainability: The pedagogical drift of art research and practice. Studies in Art Education, 53(4), 283–301.Google Scholar
  15. Helguera, P. (2011). Education for socially engaged art: A materials and techniques handbook. Bethesda: Jorge Pinto Books.Google Scholar
  16. Hickey-Moody, A. (2013). Affect as method: Feelings, aesthetics and affective pedagogy. In R. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies (pp. 79–95). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. (2013). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Lewis, T.E. (2010). Swarm intelligence: Rethinking the multitude from within the trasversal commons. Culture Theory and Critique, 51(3), 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Manning, E. (2011). Relationscapes. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  20. Manning, E. (2013). Always more than one: Individuation’s dance. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Manning, E., & Massumi, B. (2014). Thought in the act: Passages in the ecology of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  22. Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Massumi, B. (2011). Semblance and event: Activist philosophy and the occurrent arts. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  24. May, T. (2009). Gilles Deleuze: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Meyer, H. (2012). Personal interview.Google Scholar
  26. Morrell, A. (2013). Editorial: Residencies. CMagazine, 119, 2.Google Scholar
  27. Olsson, L. M. (2009). Movement and experimentation in young children’s learning: Deleuze and Guattari in early childhood education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Parikka, J. (2008). Insect technics: Intensities of animal bodies. In B. Herzogenrath (Ed.), (Un)easy alliance – thinking the environment with Deleuze/Guattari (pp. 339–362). Cambridge, UK: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
  29. Rotas, N., & Springgay, S. (2013). ‘You go to my head’: Art, pedagogy and a politics to come. Pedagogies, 8(3), 278–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Semetsky, I. (2013). Deleuze, education and becoming. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Springgay, S. (2008). Body knowledge and curriculum: Pedagogies of touch in youth and visual culture. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  32. St. Pierre, E. (2013). The appearance of data. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 223–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stengers, I. (2010). Cosmopolitics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  34. Thacker, E. (2004). Networks, swarms, multitudes, part two. Ctheory. Accessed online February 2014, from http://www.ctheory.net/printer.asp?id=423
  35. Tianinen, M., & Parikka, J. (2013). The primacy of movement: Variation, intermediality and biopolitics in Tero Sarrinen’s Hunt. In E. Barrett & B. Bolt (Eds.), Carnal knowledge towards a ‘new materialism’ through the arts (pp. 205–224). New York: I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd.Google Scholar
  36. Vehlken, S. (2013). Zootechnologies: Swarming as a cultural technique. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(6), 110–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zaliwska, Z. & Springgay, S. (2015). Diagrams and cuts: A materialist approach to research-creation. Cultural Studies Critical Methodologies.Google Scholar
  38. Zepke, S., & O’Sullivan, S. (2010). Deleuze and contemporary art. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Curriculum Studies (OISE) and Book History & Print Culture (Massey College)University of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of Curriculum, Teaching and LearningOntario Institute for Studies in Education, University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations