Abstract
Elective institutions have been read into sources going back to India’s later Vedic period (the early first milennium B.C.): The Aitareya Brahmaṇa mentions “Vairâjya” rulers in northern and Svarâṭ rulers in western India, the former a system of self-government or self-rule where the plurality of people were annointed.1 This passage has been repeatedly interpreted in the sense of Vairâjya states being kingless, so that not one individual but a large group, if not the whole people, were consecrated to sovereignty.2 Svarâṭ has been interpreted to mean a ruler elected among equals through an election based upon merit, a kind of president within a self-government (Svârâjya) system.3 The existence of republican along with monarchical states, in the “Middle Country” of ancient India, is indicated in a hardly less controversial passage in the Avadâna Sataka: “... In the countries of some of us there are kings, but in others there is Gana government.”4 “Gaṇa” states have been interpreted as aristocratic, though the Mahâbhârata mentions — possibly referring to them — “persons that are equal to one another in family and blood... “ 5 The Lichchavi Gaṇa state (known from early Buddhist literature) had an assembly of 7707 members and a Council of nine.6
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aitareya Brâhmaṇa, VIII, 14: Arthur B. Keith (Translator), The Aitareya and Kausitaki Brahmanas of the Rig veda (Harvard Oriental Series, XXV: Cambridge, USA, 1920), p. 330.
As against Keith, op. cit., p. 331, fn. 2: A. S. Altekar, State and Government in ancient India (Delhi, 1958), p. 117; K. P. Jayaswal, Hindu Polity. A constitutional history of India in Hindu times (Bangalore, 1943), p. 89.
Jayaswal, pp. 80f.
Avadâna Sataka, II, 88; cited by Altekar, p. 109 and R. Ch. Majumdar, Corporate life in ancient India (Calcutta, 1922), p. 223.
Mahâbhârata-Canti Parva, CVII: The Mahabharata translated into English prose by Pratapa Chandra Ray — Canti Parva (Calcutta, 1890), p. 348.
Altekar, p. 132.
Ibid.
Altekar, p. 115; Jayaswal, p. 174.
Mahâ-Parinibbâna-Sutta, 1,4 = Buddhist Suttas translated from the Pâli by Rhys Davids, in: M. Müller (Editor), Sacred Books of the East, Vol. XI (Oxford, 1881), pp. 31.
Telapatta-Jâtaka, Verse 399: Cowell, Jâtaka, Vol. I (1957), p. 236.
T. W. Rhys Davids, Buddhist India (London, 1917), p. 19.
Altekar, p. 122.
Jayaswal, p. 46.
Altekar, p. 124.
Dulva, V, fol. 150: The life of the Buddha and the early history of his order. Derived from Tibetan works in the Bkah-Hgyur and Bstan-Hgyur translated by W. Woodville Rockhill (London, 1907), p. 119.
Altekar, p. 122.
Rhys Davids, Buddhist India, p. 22.
Pâṇini, VIII, 1.15, cited by Altekar, p. 130.
Kulâvaka-Jâtaka: Cowell, Jâtaka, Vol. I (1895), p. 77.
Rhys Davids, Buddhist India, pp. 46f.
Ibid.t p. 48.
Ibid., p. 51.
Ibid., p. 101.
Ibid., p. 49.
Ibid., p. 62.
Ibid., pp. 2571.
Ibid., p. 247.
Arrian, VIII, Indika, 10, viii-ix: Arrian with an English translation by E. Iliff Robson, Vol. II (London, 1933), p. 335.
Diodorus, II, 39: J. W. McCrindle, Ancient India as described by Megasthenes and Arrian, being a translation of the fragments of the Indika of Megasthenes (London, 1877), p. 40.
Arrian, VIII, Indika, 10,v: transl. E. Iliff Robson, op. cit., p. 340 (341).
Diodorus, CII: Diodor’s von Sicilien, Historische Bibliothek, übersetzt von Julius Friedrich Wurm, XIII. Bändchen (Stuttgart, 1838), p. 1700 (sic.).
Elected in accordance with... his looks: Strabo, XV, i, 30: The Geography of Strabo, literally translated by C. Hamilton and W. Falconer, Vol. III (London, 1906), p. 193.
L. de la Vallée-Poussin, Dynasties et Histoire de l’Inde depuis Kanishka jusqu’aux invasions musulmans (Paris, 1935), pp. 33–34.
R. Gard, Buddhist influences on the political thought and institutions of India and Japan [Society for Oriental Studies: Claremont, California, Phoenix Papers, No. 1 (Claremont, 1949)], pp. 2,4.
D. Gokuldas, Democracy in early Buddhist Saṃgha (Calcutta, 1955), p. ix.
Ibid.
Jayaswal, pp. 42, 101.
Jayaswal, p. 100.
Altekar, p. 131.
Mahâ-Parinibbâna-Sutta, I, 4; I, 6: Buddhist Suttas translated from Pâli by Rhys Davids, in: SBE, Vol. XI, pp. 3t., 6.
R. Gard, Introduction to Buddhism and political authority, p. 5.
Gokuldas, op. cit., pp. xvii, 56.
Mahâvagga, II, xiv, 3; Chullavagga, IV, xiv, 16: Vinaya Texts translated from Pâli by T. W. Rhys Davids & Hermann Oldenberg, in: SBE, Vol. XIII (1881), p. 259; Vol. XX (1885) p. 46.
Chullavagga, IV, ix, 5; IV, xiv, 24, 26, in: SBE, Vol. XX, pp. 25, 54, 56.
Chullavagga, IV, xiv, 19, 24; XII, ii, 7, in: SBE, Vol. XX, pp. 49, 53, 407. Though majority vote in general decided the dispute, the binding force of this majority principle was not recognized in all cases: “There are ten cases, o Bhikkhus, in which the taking of votes is invalid.... When the taker of votes knows that those whose opinions are not in accordance with the Law will be in the majority..., when... voting may result in a schism in the Samgha....and when they do not vote in accordance with the view [which they really hold]”: Chullavagga, IV, 10, in: SBE, Vol. XX, pp. 26f. The texts do not explain at all how the matter was to be decided if the majority decision were rejected. Such casuistry deviating from the generally democratic principles prevalent in the Vinaya has yet to be satisfactorily explained.
Mahâvagga, II, xvii, 2, in: SBE, Vol. XIII, p. 267.
Gokuldas, op. cit., pp. xv, xvii.
H. Nakamura, The ways of thinking of Eastern Peoples (Tokyo, 1960), p. 99.
M. Bode, Pâli literature of Burma, p. 60.
R. Spence Hardy, Eastern Monachism: An account of the order of mendicants founded by Gotama Budha (London, 1850), pp. 329, 375.
Sutta Nipâta (verses 6491; 654), III, ix, 561, 61, in: SBE, Vol. X, ii (1881), pp. n6f.
Dhammapada, 396, in: SBE, Vol. X, p. 91; Aggañña Sutta, Dîgha Nikâya, XXVII, 4; 271, 30f: transl. Rhys Davids, pp. 78f., 921.
Sutta Nipâta (verses 135; 141), I, vii (Valasutta of the Uravagga), 21; 27; (verses 621, 623f, 629f, 634), III, ix (Vâsetthasutta of the Mahâvagga), 28, 30f, 36f, 41; (verse 620), III, ix, 27; I, vii (Vasalasutta), 2; (verse 611), III, ix (Vâsetthasutta of the Mahâvagga), 18, in: SBE, Vol. X, ii, pp. 23, 113f, 21, 112.
See p. 24, fn. 4.
Chullavagga, VI, xv, 2, in: SBE, Vol. XX, pp. 210f.; Nissaggiyâ Pâkittiya Dhammâ, 18–19, 22, in: SBE, Vol. XIII, pp. 18 (fn. 1), 26, 27; Maung Maung, Law, p. 126
R. Ch. Majumdar, Corporate life in ancient India (Calcutta, 1922), pp. 320f.
Gokuldas, Democracy in the early Buddhist Saṃgha, p. xix.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1965 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sarkisyanz, E. (1965). Republican Institutions in PRE-Buddhist India and in the Buddhist Order. In: Buddhist Backgrounds of the Burmese Revolution. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6283-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6283-0_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-5830-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-6283-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive