Skip to main content

Dialogvs, Ivlivs Exclvsvs e Coelis

  • Chapter
Erasmi Opuscula

Abstract

In 1506, after years of expectation and disappointment, Erasmus finally put into effect his plan to visit Italy. His sojourn in the ancient centre of culture and religion was of great significance for his development both as humanist and reformer, and is therefore an important event in the history of Christian humanism in Northern Europe 1). There he perfected his command of Greek, read through ancient manuscripts unobtainable in the North, and mingled freely with the most distinguished scholars of the Italian Renaissance. There, too, he had his first opportunity to view the papacy at close range. Rome in the first years of the sixteenth century might prove very enlightening to a spiritually-minded Christian, gifted, as was Erasmus, with the piercing vision of the born satirist. For three years he regarded the turbulent Italian scene from one point of vantage after another, but always with an interested eye on the papal comedy. The first fruit of these years of thoughtful observation was the Moriae Encomium, the second, less famous but scarcely less significant, the dialogue Iulius exclusus e coelis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Cf. P. de Nolhac: Érasme en Italie, 1888, p. 94 f. „L’Italie a été pour Érasme l’école où s’est achevée sa formation intellectuelle. C’est là qu’il a mûri ce talent d’écrivain qui va remuer les idées de toute une génération, la plus féconde du siècle; c’est là aussi qu’il a pris pleine conscience de l’esprit nouveau, dont il sera dans les pays du Nord le grand propagateur. A ce double titre, le séjour que nous avons raconté peut être considéré comme l’un des faits les plus importants de la Renaissance.”

    Google Scholar 

  2. For full account of Erasmus’ stay in Italy, see Smith, pp. 101— 16; de Nolhac; and the correspondence for 1506–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. From Florence he wrote to Servatius, 4 Nov. 1506: „Italiam multis de causis adiuimus, quanquam hanc magnis bellorum tumultibus agitatam offendimus.” Ep. 200, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cf. IE 358 n.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cf. de Nolhac, p. 45 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cf. Ep. 213, 1–2, to Aldus, Dec. 1508: „Male precor bellis istis, per quos non licet nobis ea Italiae parte frui quae mihi in dies magis ac magis arridet ”

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cf. Catalogus Lucubrationum, Allen, I, 37, 7–12; de Nolhac, p. 82; E. C. Bagdat: La „Querela Pacis” d’Érasme, 1924, p. 61 f. In the Dulce bellum he refers to the argument against the war under the title Antipolemus. LB, II, 968, C. Both memoirs have been lost.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Anticiceronianus, LB, I, 1017, B.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid. LB, I, 993, B; cf. Smith, p. 114; C. Cantu: Les Hérétiques ’dItalie, 1869–70, I, 524; IE 1196–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. LB, X, 1754; cf. Smith, p. 113.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cf. Ep. 215.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cf. Ep. 218 Introd.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Epp. 232, 10–13; 233, 5; 262, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Epp. 236; 239; 247; and there were probably other letters which have been lost.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cf. Epp. 218 Introd.; 243, 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ep. 251.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cf. Ep. 961, 38.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cf. Epp. 532, 23; 543, 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See note on editions; cf. list in E. Böcking: Ulrichs von Hutten Schriften, 1859–69, IV, 422 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nesen to Bruno Amerbach, June 1518, Basle MS. G. II. 30, fo. 83; quoted by L. Geiger in Vierteljahrsschrift für Kultur und Litteratur der Renaissance, I, 1886, p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Die Vadianische Briefsammlung der Stadtbibliothek St. Gallen, ed. by E. Arbenz and H. Wartmann, 1890–1908, Ep. 136.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Christoph Scheurl’s Briefbuch, ed. by F. von Soden and J. K. F. Knaake, 1867–72, Epp. 137, 30 Sept. 1517; 158, 5 Jan. 1518.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Luther’s Briefwechsel, ed. by E. L. Enders and others, 1884–1923, Ep. 50, 11 Nov. 1517.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Heumann: Documenta literaria, 1758, p. 117; cf. Allen, III, p. XXVI.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vadianische Briefsammlung, Ep. 136, 26 Oct. 1518.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ep. 532, 23–6, 18 Feb. 1517.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cf. Epp. 622, 20; 636, 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. Jortin: The Life of Erasmus, 1808, III, 280 ff; L. Geiger in Vierteljahrsschrift für Kultur und Litteratur der Renaissance, I, 1886, p. 17 ff; H. Durand de Laur: Érasme, 1872, II, 589 ff; F. M. Nichols: The Epistles of Erasmus, 1901–18, II, 446 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ep. 502 Introd.; cf. his The Age of Erasmus, 1914, pp. 184–9.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Érasme et la Papauté, 1924;and „Érasme est il l’auteur du Julius,” in Revue de Littérature comparée, V, 1925, pp. 385–415.

    Google Scholar 

  31. See for example Smith, p. 127; J. Huizinga: Erasmus, 1924, p. 107; Bagdat, op. cit. p. 61; J. J. Mangan: Erasmus of Rotterdam, 1928, II, 68.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ep. 270, 60 and n; cf. J. A. Gee: The Life and Works of Thomas Lupset, 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ep. 431, 6–11 ; cf. Gee, p. 53 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ep. 502, 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cf. Allen: Age of Erasmus, p. 185.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cf. Ep. 502 Introd. ; quotation from a letter of Erasmus to Bucer, 2 March 1532, in Copenhagen MS.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ep. 664, 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ep. 690.

    Google Scholar 

  39. To Campegio, 1 May 1519, Ep. 961, 43–4.

    Google Scholar 

  40. „Primum hoc erat imputandum iis, qui librum suo tempore scriptum, tempore non suo vulgauerunt.” Epistolae aliquot eruditorum virorum, ex quibus perspicuum quanta sit Eduardi Lei virulentia, Basle, 1520, p. 118.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cf. CND, AQR and AAL Introds.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Epp. 622, 12–30; 636, 12–26; they were probably intended for circulation and began with righteously indignant expressions of disapproval of the Epistolae obscurorum virorum; cf. Epp. 967, 168; 637, 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Epp. 961, 34–65; 967, 158–92. Campegio, always favorable to Erasmus, allowed himself to be convinced. Cf. Ep. 995, 54–6.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Epp. 785, 5 March 1518; 908, 1 Jan. 1519. Again much later, 30 March 1527, he wrote to More in the same strain, insisting that he was not responsible for the publication.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Epistolae eruditorum virorum, p. 118; cf. translation by Pineau in Revue de Littérature comparée, V, 396 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ep. 543, 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ep, 877, 10–11, 19 Oct. 1518.

    Google Scholar 

  48. See notes.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Cf. Epigramma and notes.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ep. 961, 44–8.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Cf. Durand de Laur, II, 302: „A l’Éloge de la Folie, nous rattachons le dialogue de Jules II. C’est le même esprit, le même fonds de pensées, la même ironie, le même style, le même langage avec une allure plus simple, plus dégagée, plus vive, qui annonce déjà la manière des Colloques.”

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ep. 961, 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Böcking, IV, 422; R. Förster in Archiv für Litteraturgeschichte, XIV, 1882, p. 344; L. von Pastor: Geschichte der Päpste im Zeitalter der Renaissance, III, new and enlarged edition. 1924. p. 772.

    Google Scholar 

  54. H. Hauser: „Le ,Julius’ est-il d’Érasme?” in Revue de Littérature comparée, VII, 1927, pp. 605–18. The article is chiefly an attack on M. Pineau and his thesis, but presents no new material nor cogent arguments. M. Hauser complains of the prevailing ignorance of the early editions, apparently unaware that four of the earliest are to be found in the Bibliothèque Nationale, nor that the one edition he found there is almost certainly of 1612. The note on editions below, and the comparison of texts will answer many of his questions.

    Google Scholar 

  55. L. Geiger in Vierteljahrsschrif t für Kultur und Litteratur der Renaissance, I, 1886, pp. 2–48.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Cf. J. C. Brunet: Manuel du Libraire, 1860–65; Thion’s edition of the Iulius (ed. 25).

    Google Scholar 

  57. D. F. Strauss: Ulrich von Hutten, his life and times, trans. by G. Sturge, 1874, p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Cf. Böcking, III, 207 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Cf. IE 1041–2.

    Google Scholar 

  60. „Cupio quam maxime, diuites esse Pontifices, sed Euangelico margarito, sed coelestibus opibus.... Volo quam munitissimos esse, sed armis Apostolicis; nempe, scuto fidei, lorica iustitiae, gladio salutis, quod est verbum Dei. Volo bellacissimos esse, sed aduersus veros illos Ecclesiae hostes, simoniam, superbiam, libidinem, ambitionem, iracundiam, impietatem.” Sileni Alcibiadis, LB, II, 778, B.

    Google Scholar 

  61. See the discussion of the doctrine of the Iulius in Pineau: Érasme et la Papauté, p. 29 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  62. „Ist es doch einer der schönsten Ruhmestitel Julius’ II, dass er in der Kunst wie in der Politik die allgemeinen Interessen der Kirche und des Staates stets den persönlichen vorgezogen hat.” Pastor, III, 917; „Julius II stands high above Alexander VI because his policy was disinterested and intelligible. Men could forgive much to a Pope who fought for the Church. ...” M. Creighton: A History of the Papacy during the Period of the Reformation, 1882–94, IV, 168.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Cf. J. Klaczko: Rome and the Renaissance, 1903; Creighton, IV, 169 ff; Pastor, III, 869–1041.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Cf. N. Macchiavelli: Il Principe, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  65. L. Madelin: „Le Journal d’un habitant Français de Rome,” in Mélanges d’Arrchéologie et d’Histoire, XXII, 1902, p. 266.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Böcking, III, 260 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  67. C. Guasti: Le Rime di Michelangelo Buonarroti, 1863, p. 157; cf. Klaczko, p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Cf. Pasquillorum Tomi Duo, Basle, 1544, I, 91 ff; M. Lafond: Pasquino et Marforio, 1877, p. 33 ff. For other epigrams on Julius, see M. Brosch: Papst Julius II, 1878, p. 298 f.

    Google Scholar 

  69. M. Sanuto: Diarii, 1879–1903, IX, 567f.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Ep. 532, 23–6.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Epp. 849, 31–7; 852, 50–3.

    Google Scholar 

  72. „Mitto ad te libellum de obitu Iulii M.Φ., quem tu dudum arbitratus es paucissimis visum, Amorbacchio scilicet et amiculis Erasmi aliquot, sed res iam tota, vt vides, in aperto est.” Brief w echsel der Brüder Ambrosius und Thomas Blaurer, ed. by T. Schiess, 1908–12, Ep. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Basle MSS. C. VI.a.73.fo.92; fo. 367 v°. ; G. II. 14. fo. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  74. To Scheurl, 20 Feb. 1519, Enders, Ep. 155; cf. P. Smith: Luther’s Correspondence, 1913–18, I, 165.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Cf. Luthers Tischreden, Weimar, IV, no. 4902; cf. Smith, p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Cf. P. Smith: The Life and Letters of Martin Luther, 1914, p. 79.

    Google Scholar 

  77. It is twice mentioned in an Index librorum prohibitorum published by Clement VIII, and apparently consisting of a reëdition of former lists published by Pius IV and Sixtus V. Opere di F. Paolo Sarpi, 1763, IV, 431 ff.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1933 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ferguson, W.K. (1933). Dialogvs, Ivlivs Exclvsvs e Coelis. In: Erasmi Opuscula. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6218-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6218-2_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-5795-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-6218-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics