Skip to main content

Experimental Morphology

  • Chapter
Manual of Pteridology

Abstract

Experimental Morphology is a branch of General or Causal Morphology1) which seeks by means of experiment to provide data for a consideration of problems dealing with the factors underlying the normal structure and development of plants. The question as to whether it can also contribute to the solution of evolutionary problems is an open one which will be discussed later. Such experimental data must always be taken in conjunction with the results of wide comparative examination of both the normal development and structure and of such deviations from the normal as occur naturally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. For the scope of General Morphology see W. H. Lang, Pres. Address to Section K, British Assoc, 1915.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For a critical account of Hofmeister’s contributions see Goebel, Wilhelm Hofmeister, English Translation, Ray Society, 1926, Chap. V.

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. O. Bower, Obituary Notice of Karl Ritter von Goebel, Roy. Soc, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Darnell-Smith (Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., Vol. 52, 1917) gives an account of various culture methods by means of which he was able to obtain the germination of the spores of Psilotum.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buchtien, O., Bibliotheca Bot., Bd. 11, 1887–89.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Campbell, D. H., Mosses and Ferns, 1918, p. 234.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See G. Klebs, Sitz. d. Heidelberger Akad. d. Wiss., 1916 and 1917 and J. Stephan, Jahrb. für wiss. Bot., Bd. 70,1929. Earlier literature is fully quoted here.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Stahl, Einfluss der Beleuchtungsrichtung auf die Theilung der Equisetum-Sporen, Ber. d. deutschen bot. Gesells., III Bd., 1885.

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Ludwigs, Untersuchungen zur Biologie der Equiseten, Flora, N.F. Bd. III, 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. R. Walker, The Gametophytes of three species of Equisetum, Bot. Gaz., Vol.92, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. Nienburg, Die Wirkung des Lichtes auf die Keimung der Equisetum-Sporen, Ber. d. deutschen bot. Gesells., XLII Bd., 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. Prantl, Beobachtungen über die Ernährung der Farnprothallien und die Vertheilung der Sexualorgane, Bot. Zeit., 39 Bd., 1881.

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. Prantl, Über den Einfluss des Lichtes auf die Bilateralität der Farnprothallien, Bot. Zeit., 37 Bd., 1879.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Leitgeb, Über Bilaterialität der Prothallien, Flora, 1877; Studien über Entwicklung der Farne, Der Sitz. d. k. Akad. d. wiss. Wien, LXXX Bd., 1879.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Goebel, Organ, der Pflanzen, Dritte Aufl., Erster Teil, p. 601.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cf. p. 130, where the factors governing the fertility of the sporophyte are discussed.

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. F. Atkinson, The Biology of Ferns, 1894, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stange, Ber. über die Sitz. d. Gesell, für Bot. zu Hamburg, 1886.

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. Heim, Untersuchungen über Farnprothallien, Flora, 82 Bd., 1896.

    Google Scholar 

  20. K. Goebel, Organography of Plants, Part 1, p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A convenient summary of these together with a full citation of the literature is given by Bruchmann, Von der Chemotaxis der Lycopodium-Spermatozoiden, Flora, 99 Bd., 1909, p. 193.

    Google Scholar 

  22. F. O. Bower, Primitive Land Plants, 1935, Chapter XXVI.

    Google Scholar 

  23. H. Leitgeb, Zur Embryologie der Farne, Sitz. d. k. Akad. d. wiss. Wien LXXVII, 1878.

    Google Scholar 

  24. E. Heinricher, Beeinflusst das Licht die Organanlage am Farnembryo?, Mitt. a. d. bot. Inst, zu Graz, Jena, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  25. K. Goebel, Organ, der Pflanzen, Dritte Aufl., Erster Teil, p. 333. 2) Ibid. p. 618.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  27. K. Goebel, Organography of Plants, Eng. Edit., Pt. 1, p. 152.

    Google Scholar 

  28. K. Goebel, Experimentelle Morphologie, p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See R. Snow, Growth-Regulators in Plants, New Phyt., Vol. XXXI, 1932 for an account of these.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Investigations have been concerned almost exclusively with the differentiation of xylem elements, the phloem and other tissues being ignored, possibly on account of the difficulty of recognising them in the earlier stages of their development.

    Google Scholar 

  31. W. H. Lang, Pres. Address, Brit. Assoc, Section K, 1915.

    Google Scholar 

  32. S. Williams, A Contribution to the Experimental Morphology of Lycopodium Selago, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., Vol. LVII, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  33. W. H. Lang, On Apogamy and the Development of Sporangia upon Fern Prothalli, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc, Ser. B, Vol. 190, 1898.

    Google Scholar 

  34. See D. Thoday, Some Physiological Aspects of Differentiation, New. Phyt., Vol. XXXII, 1933, where recent literature is cited and briefly discussed.

    Google Scholar 

  35. F. O. Bower, Size and Form in Plants, 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mettenius, Abhandl. Königl. Sachs. Ges. d. Wiss., VI.

    Google Scholar 

  37. J. McL. Thompson, The Anatomy and Affinity of Deparia Moorei Hook., Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., Vol. L, 1915.

    Google Scholar 

  38. H. Bruchmann, Von den Vegetationsorganen der Selaginella Lyallii Spring, Flora, Bd. 99, 1909.

    Google Scholar 

  39. C. W. Wardlaw, The Vascular System of Selaginella, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., Vol. LIV, 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  40. H. Bruchmann, Von den Wurzelträgern der Selaginella Kraussiana A.Br., Flora, 95 Bd., 1905.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Behrens, J., Ueber Regeneration bei den Selaginellen, Flora, 84 Bd., 1897.

    Google Scholar 

  42. S. Williams, An Analysis of the Vegetative Organs of Selaginella grandis Moore, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., Vol. LVII, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  43. S. Williams, A Contribution to the Experimental Morphology of Lycopodium Selago, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., Vol. LVII, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  44. See F. O. Bower, Primitive Land Plants, p. 272 et seq., and W. H. Lang, On Old Red Sandstone Plants, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., Vol. LII, p. 620 and p. 845 for recent discussions of this question.

    Google Scholar 

  45. T. G. B. Osborn, Some Observations on the Tuber of Phylloglossum, Ann. Bot., Vol. XXXIII, 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  46. S. Williams, loc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Holloway, J. E. Studies in the New Zealand Species of the Genus Lycopo-dium, Trans. New Zeal. Inst., Vol. XLIX, 1916.

    Google Scholar 

  48. See S. Williams, (loc. cit., 1931), where the literature is cited.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Solms-Laubach, Isoetes lacustris, seine Verzweigung usw., Bot. Zeit., 1902, p. 179.

    Google Scholar 

  50. K. Ludwigs, loc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  51. R. L. Praeger, Propagation from Aerial Shoots in Equisetum, Journ. of Bot., Vol. LXXII, 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  52. K. Goebel, Organ, der Pflanzen, 3 Aufl., 2 Teil, p. 1221.

    Google Scholar 

  53. K. Goebel, Organ, of Plants, Eng. Edit., Pt. 1, p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  54. K. Goebel, Einleitung in die experimentelle Morphologie, p. 215.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Figdor, Ãœber Regeneration der Blattspreite bei Scolopendrium, Ber. d. deutschen bot. Gesell., Bd. XXIV, 1906.

    Google Scholar 

  56. E. Heinricher, Nachträger zu meiner Studie über die Regenerationsfähigkeit der Cystoptevis-Arten, Ber. d. deutsch, bot. Gesell. Bd. 18, 1900.

    Google Scholar 

  57. J. Palisa, Regenerationsknospen etc., Ber. d. deutsch, bot. Gesell., Bd. 18, 1900.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Goebel, K., Organ, of Plants, Eng. Edit., Pt. II, p. 227.

    Google Scholar 

  59. K. Goebel, Einleitung etc., p. 197 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  60. K. Goebel, Einleitung in die experimentelle Morphologie, p. 9 and p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  61. K. Goebel, Organ, der Pflanzen, 3 Aufl., 2 Teil, p. 1240. 2) F. O. Bower, Primitive Land Plants, p. 191 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  62. W. H. Lang, On Apogamy and the Development of Sporangia upon Fern Prothalli, Phil. Trans Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B., Vol. 190, 1898.

    Google Scholar 

  63. E. D. W. Brown, Apogamy in Phegopteris polypodioides, Bull. Torrey Bot. Club, Vol. 50, 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  64. The value of the experiments of Nathansohn (Ueber Parthenogenesis bei Marsilia, Ber. d. bot. Gesell., Bd. 18, 1900), indicating that the tendency of spores to form apogamous embryos is increased by growing them at a higher temperature than the normal, is largely vitiated by the cytological facts as disclosed by Strasburger.

    Google Scholar 

  65. D. M. Mottier, Development of Sex Organs of Fern Prothallia under Prolonged Cultivation, Bot. Gaz., Vol. 92, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  66. H. Leitgeb, Die Sprossbildung an apogamen Farriprothallien, Ber. d. deutsch. bot. Gesells., Bd. III, 1885.

    Google Scholar 

  67. This sequence of events may give the false impression that the organs of one shoot are distributed on the two sides of the prothallus, as in examples described by de Bary.

    Google Scholar 

  68. K. Goebel, Exper.-morph. Mitteilungen, Sitz. d. math.-phys. Klasse d. Kgl. Bayer. Akad. d. Wiss., München 1907.

    Google Scholar 

  69. W. H. Lang, On Some Deviations from the Normal Morphology of the Shoot in Osmunda regalis, Mem. and Proc. Manchester Lit. and Phil. Soc, 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  70. See F. O. Bower, Primitive Land Plants, p. 495.

    Google Scholar 

  71. The observations of Land (Bot. Gaz., Vol. 75, 1923) on prothalli of Angioptevis which had been buried by falls of friable soil are interesting in relation to this question. They showed a cylindrical development of the cushion and the wings were inconspicuous; an endophytic fungus was present. Such observations suggest a possible mode of origin for the subterranean, cylindrical type of prothallus and Bower (Prim. Land Plants, p. 439) mentions the possibility of experimental work in relation to this problem.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Shattuck, C. H. The Origin of Heterospory in Marsilia, Bot. Gaz., Vol. 49, 1910, p. 19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. See R. Snow, loc. cit., for a useful review of this work. See also P. Boysen jensen, Growth Hormones in Plants, 1936 and Williams, S., Nature 139: 966.

    Google Scholar 

  74. D. Thoday, loc. cit., p. 284.

    Google Scholar 

  75. F. Weber, Protoplasmatische Pflanzenanatomie, Protoplasma, Vol. 8, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Fr. Verdoorn A. H. G. Alston I. Andersson-Kottö L. R. Atkinson H. Burgeff H. G. Du Buy C. Christensen W. Döpp W. M. Docters Van Leeuwen H. Gams M. J. F. Gregor M. Hirmer R. E. Holttum R. Kräusel E. L. Nuern-Bergk J. C. Schoute J. Walton K. Wetzel S. Williams H. Winkler W. Zimmermann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1938 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, S. (1938). Experimental Morphology. In: Verdoorn, F., et al. Manual of Pteridology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6111-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6111-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-5743-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-6111-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics