Abstract
In the preceding chapter, we touched upon a distinction in the content of laws that may serve as at least one principle of classification of them. This was the distinction between laws which were presumed true but because of the limitations of our knowledge could only be known to be probable, and those presumed true but which made probability assertions. This is tantamount to a distinction between laws which asserted necessary relations and those which affirmed probable relations. This distinction is basically a semantic one since it is concerned with the meaning of the laws and not with formal structure although to some degree this could be treated as a formal distinction (say, by differentiating between equations in which the exponential function occurred and those in which it did not). In this chapter I will be concerned chiefly with the logical structure of causal and non-causal laws and not with what the existence of such laws signifies for physical reality. This latter is a problem in its own right but belongs to a discussion not of the logic of science in the narrower sense of the term but to the semantics of scientific theories.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Max Born, Natural Philosophy of Cause and Chance (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1949).
N. R. Campbell, Physics, The Elements (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1920), Chapters II & III; denies laws express causal relation at all.
H. Feigl, “Notes on Causality,” in Feigl & Brodbeck, Readings in the Philosophy of Science (New York, 1953), pp. 408-418.
P. Frank, “Foundations of Physics,” International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol. I, 7 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1946).
V. F. Lenzen, Causality in Natural Science (Springfield, Illinois: C. C. Thomas, 1953); causality is a relation within the realm of conceptual objects.
R. B. Lindsay and Henry Margenau, Foundations of Physics (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1936), especially Chap. V; a valuable source of information about physical laws.
H. Margenau, Nature of Physical Reality (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1950), Chapter 17.
E. Nagel, “The Causal Character of Modern Physical Theory,” in Feigl and Brodbeck, op. cit., pp. 419-437.
Max Planck, “Concept of Causality in Physics,” in P. Wiener, editor, Readings in the Philosophy of Science (New York: Charles Scribners’ Sons, 1953), pp. 77–87.
B. Russell, “On the Notion of Cause,” in Feigl and Brodbeck, op. cit., pp. 387-407.
M. Schlick, Causality in Everyday Life and in Recent Science, University of California Publications in Philosophy, Vol. 15 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1932).
L. Silberstein, Causality (London: Macmillan Co., 1933).
A. P. Ushenko, “The Problem of Causal Inference,” Philosophy of Science 9, 1942, pp. 132ff.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1957 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kattsoff, L.O. (1957). Causal and Non-Causal Laws. In: Physical Science and Physical Reality. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6048-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6048-5_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-5709-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-6048-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive