Abstract
The right and the need to include Nicolai Hartmann in an account of the Phenomenological Movement are by no means beyond dispute. His inclusion will have to be justified by his actual significance for the development of the Movement, regardless of his own ambivalent relationship to it. In any event, the widespread picture of Hartmann as one of the central figures in the Phenomenological Movement badly needs revision in the light of the ascertainable facts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Studies in English
Mohanty, J. N., Nicolai Hartmann and A. N. Whitehead. A Study in Recent Platonism, Calcutta, 1957.
Samuel, Otto, A Foundation of Ontology. A Critical Analysis of Nicolai Hartmann (1954).
Beck, Lewis W., “Nicolai Hartmann’s Criticism of Kant’s Theory of Knowledge,” PPR II (1942), 472–500.
Collins, James, “The Neo-Scholastic Critique of Nicolai Hartmann,” PPR VI (1945), 109–32.
Creegan, R. F., “Hartmann’s Apriorism,” Philosophical Review L (1941), 528-30.
Eaton, Howard O., “The Unity of Axiological Ethics,” International Journal of Ethics XLIII (1932), 23–36.
Garnett, A. C., “Phenomenological Ethics and Self-realization,” Ethics LIII (1943), 159–72.
Gibson, W. R. Boyce, “The Ethics of Nicolai Hartmann,” The Australasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy XI (1933), 12–28; XII (1934), 33-61; XIII (1935), 1-23.
Hazelton, R., “On Hartmann’s Doctrine of Values as Essences,” Philosophical Review XLVIII (1939), 621–32.
Hook, Sidney, “A Critique of Ethical Realism,” International Journal of Ethics XL (1929), 179–210.
Jensen, O. C., Nicolai Hartmann’s Theory of Virtue,” Ethics LII (1942), 463–79.
Landmann, Michael, “Professor Nicolai Hartmann and Phenomenology,” PPR III (1944), 393–423.
Oakeley, H. D., “Nicolai Hartmann’s Concept of Objective Spirit,” Mind XLIV (1931), 39–57.
Ramsey, K. V., “Theism and the Ethics of Nicolai Hartmann,” Church Quarterly Review CXIX (1935), 208–25.
Schilpp, P. A, “Is Standpointless Ethics Possible?” Philosophical Review XLIV (1935), 227–32.
Schlaretzki, W. E., “Ethics and Metaphysics in Hartmann,” Ethics LIV (1943), 273–82.
Smith, John E., “Hartmann’s New Ontology,” Review of Metaphysics VII (1952), 583–601.
Walker, M. G., “Perry and Hartmann: Antithetical or Complementary?” Ethics XLIX (1938), 37–61.
Hazelton, Roger, The Relation between Value and Existence in the Philosophies of Nicolai Hartmann and A. N. Whitehead, Yale University, 1937.
Jino, David Norinoto, Coherence in Hartmann’s Ethik. Boston University, 1941.
Park, Dorothy G., The Objectivity of Value: A Study of the Ethics of N. Hartmann. University of Nebraska, 1957.
Shein, Louis, A Critique of N. H artmann’s Ethics. University of Toronto, 1946.
Ballauf, Theodor, in Heimsoeth, H. and Heiss, R., eds., Nicolai Hartmann, pp. 286-308.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1960 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Spiegelberg, H. (1960). Phenomenology in the Critical Ontology of Nicolai Hartmann (1882–1950). In: The Phenomenological Movement. Phaenomenologica, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-5920-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-5920-5_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-5650-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-5920-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive