Advertisement

Intermezzo

  • Esin Örücü

Abstract

In this brief interlude we ask ourselves the question: Are we facing a schism here, an unbridgeable split, incompatibility between the two Variations of the above five Chapters? Are the positions mutually exclusive? I do not believe this to be the case.

Keywords

Funeral Service Asbestos Dust Judicial Precedent Portland Cement Manufacturer Legal Phenomenon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd and others; Fox v Spousal (Midlands) Ltd; Matthews v Associated Portland Cement Manufacturer (1978) Ltd and others [2002] UKHL 22, [2002] 3 All ER, 305.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Esin Örücü

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations