Skip to main content

Comparative Criminology and Developing Countries

  • Chapter
Criminology Between the Rule of Law and the Outlaws
  • 126 Accesses

Abstract

A truly comparative criminology must approach existing data and conduct new research by using theoretical frameworks, propositions, or models that can be tested across various societies. For an adequate comparative criminology it is essential to ascertain whether similar social processes account for crime in technologically developed and less developed societies. For developed societies, such as the United States and the countries of Europe, the most important causal factors have been shown, generally, to be increasing urbanization and the persistence of slum areas. A universal process that crosses cultural lines is the migration of large numbers of rural people into the cities, where the subsequent process of urbanization modifies their behavior. The probabilities are high that many of these migrants and, if they are married, their children, who, if they had remained in their own rural homes, would most likely not have engaged in crime, will become involved in some sort of criminal activities in an urban context. If certain uniform social processes, such as urbanization, contribute to criminal behavior, existing variations can be assumed, conversely, to be related to variations in these processes, including urbanization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Reinhard Bendix, ‘Concepts and Generalizations in Comparative Sociological Studies,’ American Sociological Review, 28 (1963), pp. 532–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Emile Durkheim Les Règles de la Méthode Sociologique, translated by S. A. Solvay and J. H. Mueller in G. E. G. Catlin (ed.) The Rules of Sociological Method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1938, p. 139.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Comparative sociology has been characterized by Eisenstadt as ‘the investigation of the distribution of social phenomena in different societies, or types of societies, or the comparison of such „total“ societies or of major institutional spheres in terms of their development, persistence, or changeability.’ Shmuel N. Eisenstadt, ‘Social Institutions: Comparative Study,’ in International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences New York: Crowell Collier and Macmillan, 1968, Vol. 14, p. 421.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Robert Merton, ‘Foreword,’ in Robert M. Marsh Comparative Sociology: A Codification of Cross-Societal Analysis. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1967, p. v. Andreski has similarly noted an increasing interest in comparative sociology. See Stanislav Andreski, The Uses of Comparative Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marsh Comparative Sociology, pp. 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lois B. DeFleur, ‘A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Juvenile Offenders and Offences: Cordoba, Argentina, and the United States,’ Social Problems, 14 (1967), p. 183.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Marvin E. Wolfgang and Franco Ferracuti, The Subculture of Violence. London: Tavistock, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Marshall B Clinard, ‘The Relation of Urbanization and Urbanism to Criminal Behavior,’ in Ernest W. Burgess and Donald J. Bogue (eds.), Contributions to Urban Sociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1965, pp. 541–558, and Paul C. Friday, ‘Differential Opportunity and Differential Association in Sweden: A Study of Youth Crime,’ unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  9. David M. Downes, The Delinquent Solution: A Study in Subcultural Theory. New York: The Free Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hermann Mannheim, Comparative Criminology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1965, pp. 92–94; Stephen Hurwitz, Criminology. London: George Allen Sr. Unwin, 1952; Manuel López-Rey,. Crime: An Analytical Appraisal. New York: Praeger, 1970. See also Friday, ‘Differential Opportunity and Differential Association in Sweden,’ Durkheim, The Rules of Sociological Method, Ruth Shonle Cavan and Jordan T. Cavan, Delinquency and Crime: Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1968. For comparative surveys of various forms of deviance, but with little on crime, see S. N. Eisenstadt, Comparative Social Problems. New York: The Free Press, 1964 and Vytautas Kavolis, Comparative Perspectives on Social Problems. Boston: Little, Brown, 1969, Introduction.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Kirson Weinberg, ‘Juvenile Delinquency in Ghana: A Comparative Analysis of Delinquents and Non-Delinquents,’ Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science,55 (1964), pp. 471–481; Weinberg, ‘Female Delinquency in Ghana, West Africa: A Comparative Analysis,’ International Journal of the Sociology of the Family,March (1973); Weinberg, ‘Urbanization and Male Delinquency in Ghana,’ in Paul Meadows and Ephraim H Mizruchi (eds.), Urbanism, Urbanization, and Change: Comparative Perspectives Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1969, pp. 368–379; Lois B. DeFleur, ‘A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Juvenile Offenders and Offences: Cordoba, Argentina, and the United States,’ pp. 483495, and ‘Alternative Strategies for the Development of Delinquency Theories Applicable to Other Cultures,’ Social Problems,17 (1969), pp. 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marsh, Comparative Sociology,p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. J. Tobias, Crime and Industrial Society in the 19th Century. London: Batsford, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  14. William Clifford, ‘Problems in Criminological Research in Africa South of the Sahara,’ International Review of Criminal Policy, 23 (1965), p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Adam Przeworski and Henry Teune, Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley, 1970, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. DeFleur, ‘Alternative Strategies for the Development of Delinquency Theories Applicable to Other Cultures,’ p. 30. Much the same argument has been made by Evans-Pritchard who feels that comparative social science should not range beyond societies that are culturally and geographically similar E E Evans-Pritchard, The Comparative Method in Social Anthropology. London: Athlone, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  17. B. B. Hudson, M. K. Barakat, and R. LaForge, ‘Problems and Methods of Cross-Cultural Research,’ Journal of Social Issues, 15 (1959), pp. 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. J. M. Stycos, ‘Sample Surveys for Social Science in Underdeveloped Areas,’ in R. N. Adams. and J. J. Preiss (eds.), Human Organization Research Homewood, Ill: Dorsey, 1960, pp. 375388.

    Google Scholar 

  19. George P. Murdock, ‘The Cross-Cultural Survey,’ in F. W. Moore, Readings in Cross-Cultural‘ Methodology. New Haven: HRAF, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gustavo Lagos, International Stratification and Underdeveloped Countries. Chapel Hill, N. C.: University of North Carolina Press, 1963; Simon Kuznets, ‘Underdeveloped Countries and the Pre-Industrial Phases in the Advanced Countries,’ in Amar Narain Agarwala and Sampat P. Singh (eds.), The Economics of Underdevelopment. New York: Oxford University Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  21. For a graphic example of such change, see the description of a small Turkish village in Daniel Lerner, The Passing of Traditional Society. New York: The Free Press, 1958, ch. 1, pp.. 19–42.

    Google Scholar 

  22. James Bennett, ‘Criminality and Social Change,’ in Simon Dinitz and Walter C. Reckless, (eds.), Critical Issues in the Study of Crime. Boston: Little, Brown, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  23. In actuality, economic progress, according to Culbertson, is not inevitable. He regards change as being more closely linked to population growth, economic efficiency, environmental destruction, and variations in the standard of living. John M. Culbertson, Economic Development: An Ecological Approach New York: Knopf, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ibid,p. 296.

    Google Scholar 

  25. William McCord, The Springtime of Freedom: The Evolution of Developing Societies. New York: Oxford University Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Irving L. Horowitz, Three Worlds of Development: The Theory and Practice of International Stratification. New York: Oxford University Press, 1966, p. 60.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wilbert Moore, Social Change. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1963, pp. 97–101.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Population Division, United Nations Bureau of Social Affairs, ‘World Urbanization Trends, 1920–1960 (An Interim Report on Work in Progress),’ in Gerald Breese (ed.), The City in Newly Developing Countries. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1969, pp. 21–53.

    Google Scholar 

  29. W. Arthur Lewis, Development Planning. New York: Harper and Row, 1966, pp. 68–70.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Horowitz, Three Worlds of Development

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fully one-half of the Bolivian national budget was allocated to public and private education. Cuba and Brazil promise universal free education through high school by the 1980’s. Ivan Illich, ‘The False Ideology of Schooling,’ Saturday Review, October 17, 1970, p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  32. René Dumont, False Start in Africa. London: Sphere Books, 1966, p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Daniel Lerner, The Passing of Traditional Society New York: The Free Press, 1958, chs. 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  34. David Apter, The Politics of Modernization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Daniel Lerner, ‘Comparative Analysis of Processes of Modernization,’ in Horace Miner (ed.), The Modern City in Africa. New York: Praeger, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  36. William Goode, ‘Industrialization and Family Change,’ in Bert Hoselitz and Wilbert Moore (eds.), Industrialization and Society. New York: Mouton, ( UNESCO, 1963 ).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Philip Hauser, ‘Urbanization: An Overview,’ in Philip Hauser and Leo Schnore (eds.), The Study of Urbanization. New York: Wiley, 1965, pp. 37–38

    Google Scholar 

  38. Moore, Social Change,p. 93.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Clark Kerr et al. Industrialism and Industrial Man Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1960, ch. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  40. David Horton Smith and Alex Inkeles, ‘The OM Scale: A Comparative Socio-Psychological Measure of Individual Modernity,’ Sociometry,29 (December 1966,) pp. 353–377.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Joseph Kahl, The Measurement of Modernism. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1968, p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gustavo Lagos, International Stratification and Under-developed Countries. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1963, pp. 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kuznets, in Agarwala and Singh, The Economics of Underdevelopment 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Criminalité et Développement, Documents Présentés au IV Congrès des Nations Unies pour la Prévention du Crime et le Traitement des Délinquants. Milan: Fondation Internationale Pénale et Pénitentiaire Societé Internationale de Défense Sociale, 1970. See also Walter A. Lunden, ‘The Increase of Criminality in Underdeveloped Countries,’ Police, 6 (May June 1962 ), pp. 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Interpol has published International Crime Statistics for some 20 years.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Preben Wolf, ‘Crime and Development: An International Comparison of Crime Rates,’ Scandinavian Studies in Criminology, 3 (1971), pp. 107–121.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Comparisons of crime statistics across national borders involves great risks. National statistics are affected by variations in the definition of criminal behavior, by differing judicial procedures, and by alternate procedures for classification of criminal acts. See Marvin E. Wolfgang, ‘International Crime Statistics: A Proposal,’ Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 58 (March 1967), pp. 65–69.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Fourth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, ‘Social Defence Problems in Relation to Development Planning,’ Working Paper Prepared by the Secretariat. New York: United Nations, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  49. International Review of Criminal Policy,July 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Second United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Report Prepared for the Secretariat. New York: United Nations, 1960, pp. 1–18; United Nations Report, Social Change and Criminality, Report by the United Nations Congress on Crime and the Prevention of Criminality. Stockholm: United Nations, August 1965; B. N. Mullik, Criminality Resulting from Social Changes and Economic Development. Government of India, Intelligence Bureau, 1956; Fourth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Report Prepared by the United Nations Secretariat. New York: United Nations, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  51. United Nations, ‘Trends in Studies of Juvenile Delinquency,’ SOA/SD/C.S. 1–5, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Walter A. Lunden, ‘Crimes in Thailand,’ Police,12 (January-February 1968), pp. 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ibid

    Google Scholar 

  54. Andres Aguilar Mawdsley, La Delincuencia en Venezuela y su Prevención. Caracas: Ministerio de Justicia, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Oscar C. Blarduni, ‘Juvenile Delinquency: Sociological and Juridical Considerations,’ Revista del Instituto del Investigacionesy Docencia Criminologicas,9 (1965–1966), pp. 11–50.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Franco Ferracuti, ‘Juvenile Delinquency and Social Change in Puerto Rico,’ Paper presented for 1966 Meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Lenore R. Kupperstein and Jaime Toro-Calder, Juvenile Delinquency in Puerto Rico. Rio Piedras: University of Puerto Rico, 1969, p. 105.

    Google Scholar 

  58. United Nations Publication ST/TAO/SER. C/42.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Fourth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Crime and Delinquency, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Robert B. Seidman and J. D. Abaka Eyison, ‘Ghana,’ in Alan Milner (ed.), African Penal Systems. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1969, pp. 59–88.

    Google Scholar 

  61. William Clifford, ‘Juvenile Delinquency in Zambia,’ United Nations Publication SOA/ SD/CS.3, April 30, 1967, p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ibid,p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  63. J. J. Tobias, Crime and Industrial Society in the 19th Century London: B. T. Batsford, Ltd., 1967, pp. 49–50. Reprinted by permission of Schocken Books. Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ibid,p. 244.

    Google Scholar 

  65. William Clifford, ‘Training for Crime Control in the Context of National Development,’ International Review of Criminal Policy, 24 (1966), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  66. United Nations, ‘The Prevention of Delinquency in the Context of National Development,’ United Nations Publication ST/SOA/SG/CG.2/WP.1, Geneva, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1976 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Clinard, M.B. (1976). Comparative Criminology and Developing Countries. In: Criminology Between the Rule of Law and the Outlaws. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4988-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4988-6_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-268-0844-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-4988-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics