Abstract
Like Hobbes, the Scottish philosophers David Hume (1711–1776) and Adam Smith (1723–1790) were looking for natural causes of the phenomena which we describe as moral: Hume in A Treatise of Human Nature (1739–40) and An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Nature (1739–40), and Smith in The Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759). Hume gave to his book A Treatise on Human Nature the subtitle ‘An attempt to introduce the experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects’. In this context, ‘experimental’ means ‘based on experience and observation’. By ‘moral subjects’, Hume means the human sciences in general, of which ethics is one branch. According to Hume, we must also restrict ourselves to what we can observe in the human sciences. He considers a knowledge of supersensible ultimate principles to be impossible, however.
Keywords
- Moral Judgement
- Moral Sense
- Moral Life
- Moral Sentiment
- Practical Morality
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1981 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maris, C.W. (1981). The empiricist theories of David Hume and Adam Smith. In: Critique of the Empiricist Explanation of Morality. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4430-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4430-0_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-4432-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-4430-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive