Skip to main content
  • 74 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this hypothetical legal problem is to illustrate solutions which would result in different legal systems to a common set of facts; to highlight the interplay of legal systems when confronted by such international transactions, and to compare the various outcomes. The contributing authors have emphasized legal considerations but also have noted relevant commercial (or political) considerations where appropriate. It is assumed that the international transactions in this problem do not violate relevant antitrust or foreign-exchange laws and that all technical know-how and patents have been registered properly or protected. Each contributing author has been requested to analyze the hypothetical situation by assuming that the corporation or company is entering the jurisdiction in which he practices. (For example, a United States attorney might assume that the Solar Collector and Solar Generator are produced by two companies in the European Communities attempting to penetrate the United States market; a French attorney might assume that the Solar Collector and Solar Generator are produced by two corporations in the United States attempting to penetrate the French or European Communities market.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. No attempt is made to present a recommended plan or scheme for minimizing taxes, but rather to provide a reasonable model, based upon past experience, which can be used to observe the operation and interrelation of the various legal systems.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See, for example, Stebbings, `Panama and the Multinational Corporation: Tax Haven and Other Considerations’, 8 International Lawyer (1974), pages 626, 629.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Section 11.83(1), Internal Revenue Code of Liberia (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  4. The International Trust Company of Liberia is located at 80 Broad Street, P.O. Box 292, Monrovia, Liberia. It is represented by the following international agents: Liberian Corporation Services Inc., 5 West 45th Street, New York, New York 10036, U.S.A.; Liberian Services S.A., Pelikanstrasse 37, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland; Liberian Services Ltd., 33 Cork Street, London W1X 1HB, England; and Liberian Services (Far East) Ltd., 11th Floor, American International Tower, 16–18 Queens Road Central, Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A Service for Attorneys,The International Trust Company of Liberia, page 7, paragraph 3(a).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Section 1.4(5)(c), Business Corporation Act of Liberia (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A Service for Attorneys, Supra,note 9, page 8, paragraph 4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Section 2.1, Business Corporation Act of Liberia (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A Service for Attorneys, Supra,note 9, page 7, paragraph 3(a).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Id.,paragraph 3(b).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Id.,page 8, paragraphs 3(c) and (d).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Section 6.3(1), Business Corporation Act of Liberia (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A Service for Attorneys, Supra,note 9, page 3, paragraphs 6(a) and (b).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Id.,page 2, paragraph 5(a) and page 3, paragraph 8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ellison, `Bermuda as a Base for Multinationals’, 53 Boston University Law Review (1973), pages 367, 369.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stebbings, Supra, note 2, pages 626, 628.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Id.; See generally Hadari, `Tax Treaties and Multinational Enterprise’, 20 American Journal of Comparative Law (Winter 1972), page 111.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Section 11.84(5), Internal Revenue Code of Liberia (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  19. For example, see a detailed explanation of the tax laws of Switzerland and an explanation of their interaction with the tax laws of the United States, Braun, The Swiss Base Company: Tax Avoidance Device for Multinationals’, 50 Notre Dame Lawyer (1975), page 645.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tillinghast, `Tax Aspects of International Transactions’ (1978), Section 8.3, pages 182–199.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Campbell, D., Wittler, T.R. (1979). The Hypothetical Problem. In: Campbell, D. (eds) International Handbook on Comparative Business Law. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4399-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4399-0_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-4401-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-4399-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics