Skip to main content

Morphological non-separation revisited: a review of R. Lieber’s Deconstructing Morphology

  • Chapter
Yearbook of Morphology 1992

Part of the book series: Yearbook of Morphology ((YOMO))

Abstract

It seems obvious that words are different kinds of entities from phrases. It seems equally obvious, therefore, that morphology should comprise a separate component of the grammar from syntax; the rule of English morphology that attaches -s to dog to form dogs is surely different in kind from the principle of English syntax that states that the appears before (rather than after) head nouns in definite NPs. Obvious, perhaps, but is the idea right? Is there really any reason to believe in the strict separation of morphosyntax from phrasal syntax?

I would like to thank Jill Burstein and Gregory Ward for helpful comments to an earlier version of this review.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aronoff, M. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, H. 1989. A Corpus-Based Approach to Morphological Productivity: Statistical Analysis and Psycholinguistic Interpretation. Ph.D. thesis, Free University, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, H. and R. Lieber. 1991. “Productivity and English Derivation: A Corpus-Based Study”. Linguistics 29, 801–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, L. 1983. English Word-Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burstein, J. (forthcoming). The Stress and Syntax of Compound Nominals. Ph.D. thesis, City University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. 1970. “Remarks on Nominalization”. In R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham Mass.: Ginn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E., B. Hecht and R. Mulford. 1986. “Coining Complex Compounds in English: Affixes and Word Order in Acquisition”. Linguistics 24, 7–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, J. 1989. “Lexical Category Hierarchy and Syntactic Headedness in Compounds”. In Proceedings Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, 46–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A., J. Hawkins and G. Gilligan. 1985. “The Suffixing Preference: A Processing Explanation”. Linguistics 23, 723–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Sciullo, A. M. and E. Williams. 1987. On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, P. 1977. “On the Creation and Use of English Compound Nouns”. Language 53, 810–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabb, N. (1988). “English Suffixation Is Constrained Only by Selectional Restrictions”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 527–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, P. 1982. “Lexical Morphology and Phonology. In I.-S. Yang (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin, 3–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. and J. Ross. 1972. “A Note on Anaphoric Islands and Causatives”. Linguistic Inquiry 3, 121–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees, R. 1960. The Grammar of English Nominalizations. International Journal of American Linguistics. Publication 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, J. 1978. The Syntax and Semantics of Complex Nominals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, M. and R. Sproat. 1992. “The Stress and Structure of Modified Noun Phrases in English. In A. Szabolcsi and I. Sag, (eds.), Lexical Matters. Stanford, Calif: Center for the Study of Language and Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, R. 1980. On the Organization of the Lexicon. Ph.D. thesis, The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, R. 1983. “Argument Linking and Compounds in English”. Linguistic Inquiry 14, 251–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, R. 1984. “Grammatical Rules and Sublexical Elements”. In Papers from the Parasession on Lexical Semantics. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 187–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, R. 1992. Deconstructing Morphology. Word Formation in Syntactic Theory. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchand, H. 1969. The Categories and Types of Present-day English Word formation. München: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanan, K. P. 1986. The Theory of Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, D. 1979. “Russian Morphology and Lexical Theory”. Ms., MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, J.-Y. 1989. “Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP”. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeper, T. and M. Siegel. 1978. “A Lexical Transformation for Verbal Compounds”. Linguistic Inquiry 9, 199–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. 1983. Aspects of Warlpiri Morphology and Syntax. Ph.D. thesis, The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproat, R. 1985. On Deriving the Lexicon. Ph.D. thesis, The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toman, J. 1983. Wortsyntax. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, L. 1984. Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. Ph.D. thesis, The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walinska de Hackbeil, H. 1986. The Roots of Phrase Structure: The Syntactic Base of English Morphology. Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, G., R. Sproat and G. McKoon. 1991. “A Pragmatic Analysis of So-called Anaphoric Islands”. Language 67, 439–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. 1981. “On the Notions `Lexically Related’ and `Head of a Word”’. Linguistic Inquiry 12, 245–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodbury, A.C. 1987. “Meaningful Phonological Processes”. Language 63, 685–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sproat, R. (1993). Morphological non-separation revisited: a review of R. Lieber’s Deconstructing Morphology . In: Booij, G., van Marle, J. (eds) Yearbook of Morphology 1992. Yearbook of Morphology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3710-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3710-4_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4197-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3710-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics