Skip to main content

On Some Recent Undecidability and Incompleteness Results in the Axiomatized Sciences

  • Chapter
Philosophy of Latin America

Part of the book series: Contemporary philosophy ((COPH,volume 8))

  • 169 Accesses

Abstract

We summarize in an intuitive vein a few recent results by the authors on the incompleteness of elementary real analysis and its consequences to the axiomatized sciences, from chaos theory to the dynamics of populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Albeverio, J. E. Fenstad, R. Hoegh-Krohn, T. Lindstrom, Nonstandard Methods in Stochastic Analysis and Mathematical Physics, Academic Press (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. I. Amol’d, “Problems of Present Day Mathematics”, XVII (Dynamical systems and differential equations), Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 28, 59 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. L. Bell, Boolean-Valued Models and Independence Proofs in Set Theory, Clarendon Press (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Black, the nature of mathematics, Littlefield, Adam and Co. (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Chuaqui, Truth, Possibility and Probability: New Logical Foundations of Probability and Statistical Inference, North-Holland (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. C. A. da Costa and R. Chuaqui, Erkenntnis 29, 95 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. N. C. A. da Costa and F. A. Doria, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 30, 1041 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. N. C. A. da Costa and F. A. Doria, Found. Phys. Letters 4, pp. 363 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. N. C. A. da Costa and F. A. Doria, Philosophica 50, 901 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. C. A. da Costa and F. A. Doria, “Suppes Predicates for Classical Physics”, in J. Echeverría et al., The Space of Mathematics, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin-New York (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. C. A. da Costa and F. A. Doria, “On the Existence of Very Difficult Satisfiability Problems”, Bulletin of the Section of Logic, (University of Lodz) 21, # 4, 122–133 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. C. A. da Costa and F. A. Doria, Metamathematics of Physics.

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. C. A. da Costa and F. A. Doria, “Suppes Predicates and the Construction of Unsolvable Problems in the Axiomatized Sciences”, P. Humphreys, ed., Patrick Suppes, Scientific Philosopher, II, Kluwer (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  14. N. C. A. da Costa and F. A. Doria, “On Amol’d’s Hilbert Symposium Problems”, in G. Gottlob, A. Leitsch, D. Mundici, Proceedings of the 1993 Kurt Gödel Colloquium: Computational Logic and Proof Theory, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 713, Springer (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  15. N. C. A. da Costa and F. A. Doria, “Structures, Suppes Predicates and Boolean-Valued Models in Physics”, to appear in J. Hintikka, ed., Festschrift in Honor of Prof. V. Smirnov on this 60 11 ’ Birthday,Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  16. N. C. A. da Costa and F. A. Doria, “An Undecidable Hopf Bifurcation with an Undecidable Fixed Point”, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 33, 1913 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. N. C. A. da Costa and F. A. Doria, “Gödel Incompleteness in Analysis, with an Application to the Forecasting Problem in the Social Sciences”, Philosophia Naturalis 31, 1 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  18. N. C. A. da Costa and F. A. Doria, “Gödel incompleteness, explicit expressions for complete arithmetic degrees, and applications”, to appear in Complexity (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  19. N. C. A. da Costa, F. A. Doria and A. F. Furtado do Amaral, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 32, 2187 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. N. C. A. da Costa, F. A. Doria and J. A. de Barros, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 29, 935 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. N. C. A. da Costa, F. A. Doria and D. Krause, “Metamathematical Results on the Satisfiability Problem”, preprint CETMC-30 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  22. N. C. A. da Costa, F. A. Doria and M. Tsuji, “The Incompleteness of Finite Games with Nash Equilibria”, preprint CETMC-17 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  23. N. C. A. da Costa, F. A. Doria, A. F. Furtado do Amaral, J. A. de Barros, Found. Phys. 24, 783 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Davis, “Hilbert’s Tenth Problem is Unsolvable”, in Computability and Unsolvability2 nd edition, Dover (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  25. F. A. Doria, in J. Casti and J. Traub, “On limits”, preprint, Santa Fe Institute (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Echenique, ed., Modelos matemdticos de la estructura espacial urbana: aplicaciones en América LatinaSiap, Buenos Aires (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  27. D. Foot, Operational urban modelsMethuen (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  28. N. S. Goel, S. C. Maitra and E. W. Montroll, Rev. Mod. Phys. 44, 231 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. M. Heidegger, “Der Zeitbegriff in der Geschichtswissenschaft”, in Frühe Schriften, Vittorio Klostermann (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  30. M. Hirsch, “The Chaos of Dynamical Systems”, in P. Fischer and W. R. Smith, Chaos Fractals and DynamicsM. Dekker (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. Horgan, “Is Mathematics Becoming too much like Physics?” Sci. Am., # 2, 269, 14 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. Horgan, “Trends in Mathematics: the Death of Proof’, Sci. Am. 269, # 4, 77 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. Ladrière, Les limitations internes des formalismesUniv. de Louvain (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  34. A. A. Lewis and Y. Inagaki, “On the effective Content of Theories”, preprint, U. of California at Irvine, School of Social Sciences (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  35. G. Nicolis, I. Prigogine, Self-Organization in Noneguilibrium Systems, Wiley (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  36. H. Rogers Jr., Theory of Recursive Functions and Effective Computability, MacGrawHill (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  37. D. Ruelle and F. Takens, Commun. Math. Phys. 20, 167 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. O. Spengler, Der Untergang des AbendlandesVerlag C. H. Beck (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  39. I. Stewart, Nature 352, 664 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. P. Suppes, Set-Theoretical Structures in Sciencemimeo., Stanford University (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  41. P. Suppes, Scientific Structures and their Representation, preliminary version, Stanford University (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  42. S. Wolfram, Commun. Math. Phys. 96, 15 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Da Costa, N.C.A., Doria, F.A. (2003). On Some Recent Undecidability and Incompleteness Results in the Axiomatized Sciences. In: Fløistad, G. (eds) Philosophy of Latin America. Contemporary philosophy, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3651-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3651-0_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6366-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3651-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics