Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 17))

  • 205 Accesses

Abstract

The object of the ‘logic of assertion’ is to systematize the theory of the logical relationship between assertors and the propositions they assert. An ‘assertor’ need not in this context be a person, but may be a group of persons that issue assertions collectively, or a document, or an abstract system of propositions — such as an axiomatic theory of some subject-matter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography on Assertion Logic

  • Carnap, Rudolf(1947) Meaning and Necessity (Chicago, 1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, Alonzo(1950) ‘On Carnap’s Analysis of Statements of Assertion and Belief’, Analysis 10 (1950) 97–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, Alonzo(1954)’Intensional Isomorphism and Identity of Belief’, Philosophical Studies 5 (1954) 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L.J(1957) ‘Can the Logic of Indirect Discourse Be Formalized?’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 22 (1957) 225–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L.J.(1955) ‘Assertion Statements’, Analysis 15 (1955), 66–70. With A. C. Lloyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, R. L. (1958) ‘On the Formalization of Indirect Discourse’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 23 (1958) 417–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko(1962) Knowledge and Belief (Ithaca, N.Y., 1962 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Log, Jerzy(1948) ‘Logiki wielowartosciowe a formalicacja funkcji intensjonalnych’ [Many-valued logics and the formalization of intensional functions], Kwartalnik filozoficzny 17 (1948) 59–78. Abstracted by A. N. Prior in Formal Logic (Oxford, 1955) p. 313. Reviewed by H. Hiz in Mathematical Reviews 10 (1949) 1–2; by R. Suszko in The Journal of Symbolic Logic 14 (1949) 64–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, A.N. (1957) Time and Modality (Oxford, 1957). See pp. 121–122. PUTNAM, Hilary(1954) ‘Synonymity and the Analysis of Belief Sentences’, Analysis 14 (1954) 114–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, Nicholas(1960) ‘The Problem of a Logical Theory of Belief Statements’

    Google Scholar 

  • Philosophyof Science27 (1960) 88–95. (Cf. Chap. V above.) RESCHER, Nicholas(1961) ‘Semantic Paradoxes and the Propositional Analysis of Indirect Discourse’, Philosophy of Science 28 (1961) 437–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, Israel(1954) ‘An Inscriptional Approach to Indirect Quotation’, Analysis 14 (1954) 83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, Israel(1955) ‘On Synonymizing and Indirect Discourse’, Philosophy of Science 22 (1955) 39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1968 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rescher, N. (1968). Assertion Logic. In: Topics in Philosophical Logic. Synthese Library, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3546-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3546-9_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8331-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3546-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics