Abstract
Kant sketches a history of pure reason in which his critical philosophy surpasses both dogmatism and skepticism. But by his own admission, critical philosophy still makes use of dogmatic and skeptical procedures. Although the challenge of criticism is to refute skepticism, we find that in his lectures on logic Kant sometimes praises the sceptici, and not just for having overcome dogmatism. These lectures on logic also allow us to expand our knowledge of the kinds of judgment examined by Kant. In addition to the determinant kinds of judgment that Kant tried to justify in the Critique of Pure Reason and the Critique of Practical Reason and the reflective kinds of judgment added by the Critique of Judgment, Kant also considers a third type called “preliminary or provisional judgments” (vorläufige Urteile).1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Makkreel, R.A. (1998). Kant’s Responses to Skepticism. In: van der Zande, J., Popkin, R.H. (eds) The Skeptical Tradition Around 1800. International Archives of the History of Ideas / Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Idées, vol 155. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3465-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3465-3_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4946-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3465-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive