Abstract
I would like to preface my remarks with two quotations. The first appeared in the literary supplement to a Braunschweig gazette in 1768:
He who has once admitted to parents that their children may die of the inoculated smallpox has no right to fault them if they do not wish to attempt inoculation upon them. By the same token, one also may not fault those who, despite this presumed possibility, still have the courage and the wisdom to dare to inoculate their children, and not to await natural smallpox—that so widespread, terrible and dangerous illness. If one may lose one’s life to inoculation, but at the same time also be spared by it from contracting natural smallpox, the surest course a wise man can choose is this, to try, by means of his advice, neither to convince others to attempt it nor to refrain from it. Under such circumstances, a father must reserve the decision in this matter for himself alone.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Albrecht, P. (1998). What Do You Think of Smallpox Inoculation? A Crucial Question in the Eighteenth Century, Not Only for Physicians. In: van der Zande, J., Popkin, R.H. (eds) The Skeptical Tradition Around 1800. International Archives of the History of Ideas / Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Idées, vol 155. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3465-3_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3465-3_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4946-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3465-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive