Abstract
John Venn is traditionally regarded as the founder of the relative frequency interpretation of probability, but this tradition is misleading, both historically and textually. In The Logic of Chance, Venn was skeptical about such concepts as propensities, which he regarded as unmeaning restatements of descriptive statements of empirical relative frequencies. But while he often said that particular relations described by probabilities or rates are ‘nothing but’ expressions of the relative frequency of occurrences within a class (1866, p. 34) — a literally true characterization of such things as crime rates — he did not elevate this into a ‘theory’ of distinct probability, as writers such as Richard von Mises were to do in the period after the First World War. The German probability writing that arose out of the reaction to Quetelet was based on a kind of skepticism as well.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
The claim that the relative frequency sense was figurative leads directly to some awkward results, as von Mises pointed out, in such standard cases as the chances of winning a lottery if one holds one ticket, and there is one winning ticket out of ten thousand. Von Kries was forced to resort to the notion that we possess a natural capacity for identifying equally probable suppositions, such that we can see that there are ten thousand equal expectations of winning (von Mises, 1972, pp. 90–91).
Von Kries’s use of ‘objective’ is discussed in slightly different terms by Hart and Honoré (1959, pp. 413–15). A standard discussion of the problem of selecting a reference class may be found in W. Salmon (1971, p.40).
The subsequent history of the legal form of the doctrine consisted in part of attempts to find a nonquantitative basis for preferring a particular set of descriptive terms (Hart and Honoré, 1959, p.418).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Turner, S.P. (1986). Objective Possibility and Adequate Cause. In: The Search for a Methodology of Social Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 92. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3461-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3461-5_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8417-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3461-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive