Abstract
Morals is the paradigmatic area for which the case for Durkheim’s account of the reality of social facts is articulated (Giddens, 1971, p. 218). The thrust of Durkheim’s argument is that obligation cannot be understood without some notion of causally compelling social facts. This is a puzzling argument, in part because of its structure. As we have seen, the Rules begins with a definition of social facts that defines these facts in terms of ‘generality’, and identifies generality with the possession of an obligatory character — this last left only vaguely specified (1964, p. 9; 1982, p. 56; 1937, p. 10). By the point in the text that it is claimed that ‘social facts’ are necessary to explain obligation (e.g., 1964, pp. 121–24; 1982, pp. 142–44; 1937, pp. 120–23), a great many things other than obligations have been included in the category, and the argument begins to seem to be little more than a tautology, whose tautologous structure is concealed by the strange variousness of the things that fall into the category of social facts, a diversity that many commentators have complained about (e.g. Giddens, 1971, p. 218; Lukes, 1971, pp. 190–93).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
The set of binary oppositions Durkheim employed here, between the apparent but misleading and the hidden but real is repeated throughout his writings, and is found as early as his ‘Latin Dissertation’ on Rousseau and Montesquieu, where Montesquieu is paraphrased as claiming that “the determinate relations we call laws are closer to the nature of things and consequently hidden within it. They are covered by a veil that we must first remove if we are to get at them and bring them to light” (Durkheim, 1965, p. 62).
l’unité extérieure de l’effet ne recouvre par une réelle pluralité“ (Durkheim, 1937, p. 127).
Cf. Ellis, 1968, pp. 160–82.
Fatalism, or overregulation, can be treated as a fourth (Durkheim 1951, p. 276n; 1930, p. 311n).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Turner, S.P. (1986). Collective Forces, Causation, and Probability. In: The Search for a Methodology of Social Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 92. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3461-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3461-5_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8417-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3461-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive