Advertisement

The reproduction and development of sharks, skates, rays and ratfishes: introduction, history, overview, and future prospects

  • John P. Wourms
  • Leo S. Demski
Part of the Developments in environmental biology of fishes book series (DEBF, volume 14)

Abstract

This volume had its origin in a Symposium on the Reproduction and Development of Cartilaginous Fishes that was held at the annual meetings of the American Elasmobranch Society and the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists in Charleston, South Carolina in June 1990. The aim of this symposium was to bring together many of those scientists interested in chondrichthyan reproduction and development in order to assess the current state of knowledge in these fields.

Keywords

Female Reproductive System Cartilaginous Fish Spiny Dogfish Lemon Shark Elasmobranch Fish 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Amoroso, E.C. 1960. Viviparity in fishes. Symp. Zool. Soc. London 1: 153–181.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle. —. Historia Animalium. A.L. Peck (trans.) Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Vol. 1 (1965), 239 pp., Vol. 2 (1970), 414 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Balfour F.M. 1885. The development of elasmobranch fishes. Vol. 1, pp. 60–520, Vol. 4, 3–23. In: M. Foster und A. Sedgwick (ed.) The Works of Francis Maitland Balfour, MacMillan, London.Google Scholar
  4. Borcea, I. 1905. Recherches sur le système uro-génital des elasrnobranches. Arch. Zool. Exp. Gen. 4: 199–484.Google Scholar
  5. Ca lard, I.P., L. Klosterman und G.V. Callard. 1988. Reproductive physiology. pp. 277–317. In: T. Shuttleworth (ed.) Physiology of Elasmobranchs, Springer Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carroll R.T. 1986. Vertebrate paleontology and evolution. W.H. Freeman und Co., San Francisco. 698 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Chieffi, G. 1962. Integration of reproductive functions. II. Endocrine aspects of reproduction in elasmobranch fishes. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. Suppl. 1: 275–285.Google Scholar
  8. Chieffi, G. 1967. The reproductive system of elasmobranchs: development and endocrinological aspects. pp. 553–580. In: P.W. Gilbert, R.F. Mathewson und D.P. Rall (ed.) Sharks, Rays and Skates, John Hopkins Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, E. 1963. The maintenance of sharks in captivity, with a report on their instrumental conditioning. pp. 115–149. In: P.W. Gilbert (ed.) Sharks and Survival, D.C. Health und Co., Boston. Compagno, L.J.V. 1988. Sharks of the order Carcharhiniformes. Princeton University Press, Princeton. 486 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Compagno, L.J.V. 1990. Alternative life-history styles of cartilaginous fishes in time and space. Env. Biol. Fish. 28: 33–75.Google Scholar
  11. Daniel, J.F. 1922. The elasmobranch fishes. University of California Press, Berkeley. 334 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Dean, B. 1906. Chimaeroid fishes and their development. Carnegie inst. Wash. Publ. 32. Washington. 194 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Dodd J.M. 1983. Reproduction in cartilaginous fishes. pp. 31–95. in:: W.S. Hoar D.J. Randall und E.M. Donaldson (ed.) Fish Physiology Vol. 9A, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Fauré-Fremiet M.E. und C. Baudouy. 1938. Sur l’ovokératine des sélachiens. Bull. Soc. Chim. Biol. 20: 14–23.Google Scholar
  15. Filhol, J. und H. Garrault. 1938. La secretion de la prokératine et la formation de la capsule ovulaire chez la sélachiens. Arch. Anat. Microscop. 34: 105–145.Google Scholar
  16. Gilbert, P.W. (ed.) 1963. Sharks and suryival. D.C. Heath und Co., Boston. 578 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Gilbert, P.W. 1978. Sharks in perspective. pp. 1–10. In: E.S. Hodgson und R.F. Mathewson (ed.) Sensory Biology of Sharks, Skates and Rays, Office of Naval Research, Department of the Navy, Arlington.Google Scholar
  18. Gilbert, P.W., R.F. Mathewson und D.R Rall (ed.) 1967. Sharks, skates and rays. The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore. 624 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Gilbert, E W. und D.A. Schlernitzauer. 1966. The placenta and gravid uterus of Carcharhinus falciformis. Copeia 1966: 451–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goldstein, L. (ed.) 1971. Symposium on elasmobranch biology. Bar Harbor, Maine, 20–23 June 1971. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 42A: 3–261.Google Scholar
  21. Graham, C.R. 1967. Nutrient transfer from mother to fetus and placental formation. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Delaware, Newark. 55 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Gudger, E.W. 1912. Natural history notes on some Beaufort, N.C. Fishes,1910–11. No. I. Elasmobranchii - with special reference to uterogestation. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 25: 141–156.Google Scholar
  23. Gudger, E.W. 1940. The breeding habits, reproductive organs, and external embryonic development of Chlamydoselachus based on notes and drawings left by Bashford Dean. pp. 521646. In: E.W. Gudger (ed.) Bashford Dean Memorial Volume - Archaic fishes, Art. 7, American Museum of Natural History, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Hamlett, W.C. und B. Tota (ed.) 1989. Evolutionary and contemporary biology of elasmobranchs. J. Exp. Zool. Suppl. 1: 1–198.Google Scholar
  25. Hisaw, F.L. und A. Albert. 1947. Observations on the reproduction of the spiny dogfish, Squalus acanthias. Biol. Bull. 92: 187–199.Google Scholar
  26. Hoar, W.S. 1969. Reproduction. pp. 1–72. In: W.S. Hoar und D.J. Randall (ed.) Fish Physiology, Vol. 3, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Hodgson, E.S. und Mathewson (ed.) 1978. Sensory biology of sharks, skates, and rays. Office of Naval Research Department of the Navy, Arlington. 666 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Jollie, W.P. und L.G. Jollie. 1967a. Electron microscopic observations on the yolk sac of the spiny dogfish, Squalus acanthias. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 18: 102–126.Google Scholar
  29. Jollie, W.P. und L.G. Jollie. 1967b. Electron microscopic observations on accommodations to pregnancy in the uterus of the spiny dogfish, Squalus acanthias. J. Utrastruct. Res. 20: 161178.Google Scholar
  30. Leigh-Sharpe, W.H. 1920. The comparative morphology of the secondary sexual characters of elasmobranch fishes. Mem. 1, J. Morph. 34: 245–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leigh-Sharpe, W.H. 1922. The comparative morphology of the secondary sexual characters of elasmobranch fishes. Mem. 3, 4, and 5. J. Morph. 36: 191–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lorenzini, S. 1678. Osservazioni intorno alle torpedini (Internal observations on the Torpedo). l’Onofri, Florence. 136 pp. Maréchal, T. 1906. Sur l’ovogénèse des sélaciens et de quelques autres chordates. Le Cellule 24: 7–239.Google Scholar
  33. Müller, J. 1842. Über den glatten Hai des Aristotles und über die Verschiedenheiten unter den Haifischen und Rochen in der Entwicklung des Eies. Abhandl. Akad. Wiss., Berlin (1840) 27: 187–257.Google Scholar
  34. Needham, J. 1942. Biochemistry and morphogenesis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 785 pp.Google Scholar
  35. Northcutt, G. (ed.) 1977. Recent advances in the biology of sharks. Amer. Zool. 17: 289–515.Google Scholar
  36. Ouang, T.Y. 1931. La glande de l’eclosion chez les plagiostomes. Ann. Inst. Ocean. 10: 283–370.Google Scholar
  37. Pickford, G.E. und J.W. Atz. 1957. The physiology of the pituitary gland in fishes. New York Zoological Society, New York. 613 pp.Google Scholar
  38. Price, K.S. und F.C. Daiber. 1967. Osmotic environments during fetal development of dogfish, Mustelus Canis (Mitchill) and Squalus acanthias Linnaeus and some comparison with skates and rays. Physiol. Zool. 40: 248–260.Google Scholar
  39. Ranzi, S. 1932. Le basi fisio-morfologische dello sviluppo embrionale dei selaci. Parti I. The physio-morphological basis of embryonic development in sharks. Publ. Staz. Zool. Napoli 13: 209–290.Google Scholar
  40. Ranzi, S. 1934. Le basi fisio-morfologische dello sviluppo embrionale dei selaci. Parti I1, Ill. The physio-morphological basis of embryonic development in sharks. Publ. Staz. Zool. Na-poli 13: 331–437.Google Scholar
  41. Rondelet G. 1554. De piscibus mariais. Manias Bonhomme, Lyon. 583 pp.Google Scholar
  42. Rückert, J. 1899. De erste Entwicklung des Eies der Elasmobranchier. pp. 581–704. In: Festschrift zum siebenzigsten Geburtstag von Carl von Kupffer Gustav Fisher, Jena.Google Scholar
  43. Scammon, R.E. 1911. Normal plates on the development of Squalus acanthias. pp. 1–140. In: G. Keibel (ed.) Normentafeln zur Entwicklungs-geschichte der Wirbeltiere, Vol. 12, Gustav Fisher, Jena.Google Scholar
  44. Shann, E.W. 1923. The embryonic development of the porbeagle shark, Lamna cornubica. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 11: 161–171.Google Scholar
  45. Singer, C. 1921. Greek biology and its relation to the rise of modern biology. pp. 1–101. In: C. Singer (ed.) Studies in the History and Method of Science, Vol. 2, Clarendon Press, Oxford. Smith, B.G. 1937. The anatomy of the frilled shark, Chlamydoselachus anguineus Garman. pp. 331–520. In: E.W. Gudger (ed.) Bashford Dean Memorial Volume–Archaic Fishes, Art. 6, American Museum of Natural History, New York.Google Scholar
  46. Smith, B.G. 1942. The heterodontid sharks: their natural history and the external development of Heterodontus (Cestracion) japonicus based on notes and drawings by Bashford Dean. pp. 651–770. ln: E.W. Gudger (ed.) Bashford Dean Memorial Volume - Archaic fishes, Art. 8, American Museum of Natural History, New York.Google Scholar
  47. Springer, S. 1948. Oviphagous embryos of the sand shark, Carcharias taurus. Copeia 1948: 153–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Springer, V.G. und J.P. Gold. 1989. Shark in question. Smithsonian Institition Press, Washington. 187 pp.Google Scholar
  49. Steno, N. 1673. Observationes anatomicae spectantes ova viviparorum. Acta Med. Hafniensia 2: 219–232.Google Scholar
  50. Te Winkel, L.E. 1950. Notes on ovulation, ova, and early development in the smooth dogfish, Mustelus Canis. Biol. Bull. 99: 474–486.Google Scholar
  51. Te Winkel, L.E. 1963. Notes on the smooth dogfish, Mustelus Canis, during the first three months of gestation. II. Structural modifications of yolk-sacs and yolk-stalks correlated with increasing absorptive function. J. Exp. Zool. 152: 123–137.Google Scholar
  52. Vandebroek, G. 1936. Les mouvements morphogénétiques au cours de la gastrulation chez Scyllium canicula Cuv. Arch. Biol. ( Paris ) 47: 499–582.Google Scholar
  53. Vivien, J. 1958. Les glands endocrines. pp. 1470–1544. In: P.P. Grassé (ed.) Traité de Zoologie, Vol.13, Part 2, Masson, Paris. Vogel, S. 1992. Vital circuits. Oxford University Press, New York. 315 pp.Google Scholar
  54. Wilson, E.O. 1992. The diversity of life. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge. 424 pp.Google Scholar
  55. Wood-Mason, J. und A. Alcock. 1891. On the uterine villiform pa-pillae of Pteroplatea micrura, and their relation to the embryo. Proc. Roy. Soc. London 49: 359–367.Google Scholar
  56. Wourms, J.P. 1977. Reproduction and development in chondrichthyan fishes. Amer. Zool. 17: 379–410.Google Scholar
  57. Wourms, J.E, B.D. Grove und J. Lombardi. 1988. The maternal-embryonic relationship in viviparous fishes. pp. 1–134. In: W.S. Hoar und D.J. Randall (ed.) Fish Physiology, Vol.11B, Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  58. Wourms, J.P. und J. Lombardi, 1992. Reflections on the evolution of piscine viviparity. Amer. Zool. 32: 276–293.Google Scholar
  59. Ziegler, H.E. und F. Ziegler. 1892. Beitrage zur Entwicklungsgeschichte von Torpedo. Arch. Mikr. Anat. 39: 56–102.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • John P. Wourms
    • 1
  • Leo S. Demski
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesClemson UniversityClemsonUSA
  2. 2.Division of Natural SciencesNew College of the University of South FloridaSarasotaUSA

Personalised recommendations