Advertisement

Emotion, Metaphor, Music, and Humor

Chapter
Part of the Analecta Husserliana book series (ANHU, volume 63)

Abstract

I will first give a sampling of the arguments in my 1995 book Emotion in Aesthetics.1 John Hospers and Peter Kivy basically gave up on understanding how music renders emotion claiming that it is a mysterious necessity and divine mystery.2 Diana Raffman recently argued that our knowledge of emotion in music is ineffable.3 One of the most lucid statements in this regard comes from Harold Osborne, President of the British Society of Aesthetics, who advised that the entire controversy regarding the problem of expressionism in music be given up: He stated that “Problems that have no solution are problems to be repudiated.”4 I will propose a solution.

Keywords

Positive Emotion Music Therapy Aesthetic Experience Moral Value Bodily Feeling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Warren Shibles, Emotion in Aesthetics (Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    John Hospers, “Art and Reality,” in Art and Philosophy: A Symposium, ed. Sidney Hook (NY: New York University, 1966), p. 149; Peter Kivy, Sound Sentiment: an Essay on the Musical Emotion (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1989), p. 259.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Diana Raffman, Language,Music, and Mind (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Olga Meidner, “Motion and E-Motion in Music,” British Journal of Aesthetics,Vol. 25, no. 4 (1985), pp. 349–356.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Norwood Hanson, Perception and Discovery (San Francisco, CA: Freeman, Cooper, 1969).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marcus Aurelius, Meditations trans. G. Long (NY: Doubleday, 1964 (1862)).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eduard Hanslick, Vom Musikalisch-Schönen: Aufsätze Musikkritiken, rev. edition (Leipzig: Reclam, 1982).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. D. Pears & B. McGuinness (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1961), #6.421, p. 147.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    George Buelow, “Rhetoric and Music,” New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, ed. S. Sadie, 20 vols. (NY: Macmillan, 1980), Vol. 15, p. 793.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. Kimmel, “The Sounds of Music: First Movement,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Vol. 26, no. 3 (1992), p. 64.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hyde Cox, and C. Lathem, Selected Prose of Robert Frost (NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1956), pp. 24, 37.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leonard Bernstein, The Unanswered Question (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976), p. 139. Cf. Max Rieser, “Analysis of the Poetic Simile,” Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 37 (1940), pp. 209–17; Ronald Winter, “Notes sur le dynamisme de la métaphore,” Bulletin des Jeunes Romanistes, No. 2 (1960), pp. 41–48.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bernstein, op. cit., p. 153.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Donald Ferguson, Music as Metaphor (MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1960).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ivan Fônagy, Die Metaphern in der Phonetik; ein Beitrag zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des wissenschaftlichen Denkens (The Hague: Mouton, 1963).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stephen Davies, Musical Meaning and Expression (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994), p. 49.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roger Scruton, The Aesthetic Understanding (London: Methuen, 1983), p. 100.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Monroe Beardsley, Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism (NY: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1958).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cf. V. Howard, “On Musical Expression,” BJA, Vol. 11, no. 3 (1971), pp. 268–280.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Warren Shibles, An Analysis of Metaphor in the Light of W M. Urban’s Theories (The Hague: Mouton, 197 lb).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Roger Scruton, Art and Imagination (London: Methuen, 1974), p. 39.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    John Dewey, Experience and Nature, NY: Dover, 1958 (orig. 1929), p. 270.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Warren Shibles, “Poetry and Philosophy,” Philosophy Today, Vol. 20 (1976), pp. 31–34.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bernstein, op. cit., p. 279.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ian Ramsey, Models and Mystery (NY: Oxford University Press, 1964), p. 69.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kenneth Burke, Permanence and Change: An Anatomy of Purpose (IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1954).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Warren Shibles, Metaphor: An Annotated Bibliography and History (Whitewater, WI: Language Press, 1971a).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bernstein, op. cit., p. 162.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Edmund Gurney, The Power of Sound (NY: Basic Books, 1966 (1880)), p. 324.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cf. Burke, op. cit, ch. 3, 4.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, 1962).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shibles, 1995, op. cit.; Models of Ancient Greek Philosophy (London: Vision Press, 1974c).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cf. V. Howard, “On Musical Expression,” BJA, Vol. 11, no. 3 (1971), p. 268.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Warren Shibles, “Die metaphorische Methode,” Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte, Vol. 48, no. 1 (1973a), pp. 1–9; Warren Shibles, “The Metaphorical Method,” JAAC,Vol. 8 (19746), pp. 25–36; Warren Shibles, “11 Metodo metaforico,” Lingua e Stile, Vol. 8 (1973b), 321–334.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Peter Kivy, The Corded Shell: Reflections on Musical Expression (NJ: Princeton University Press, 1980), pp. 54–55.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Buelow, op. cit., p. 800.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Adrienne Lehrer, “Talking about Wine,” Language, Vol. 51, no. 4 (1975), p. 902.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sybil Barten, “The Language of Musical Intonation,” JAAC, Vol. 26, no. 2 (1992), pp. 57–58.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Davies, 1994, op. cit., 48–49.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kivy 1980, op. cit., p. 54.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Isidore Silz, “Heine’s Synaesthesia,” PMLA, Vol. 57 (1942), pp. 469–488.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cf. Daniel Putman, “Music and the Metaphor of Touch,” JAAC, Vol. 44, no. 1 (1985), 59–66.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bernstein, op. cit., p. 151.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bernstein, op. cit., pp. 131, 140.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cf. “Dylan Thomas” in Shibles 1971 a, op. cit. p. 281.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Theodor Lipps, Ästhetik: Psychologie des Schönen und der Kunst, Vol. 1 (Hamburg, Leipzig: Leopold Voss Verlag, 1903); Theodor Lipps, Die Ästhetische Betrachtung und die Bildende Kunst, Vol. II (Hamburg, Leipzig: Leopold Voss Verlag, 1906); Theodor Lipps, Vom Fühlen,Wollen und Denken (Leipzig: J. Barth, 1907).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kivy, 1980, op. cit., pp. 54–55.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ann Behrend, “Expression and Emotion in Music,” Ph.D. diss. (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1988), p. 204.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bernstein, op. cit., p. 143.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Theodor Adorno, Introduction to the Sociology of Music, trans. E. Ashton (NY: Seabury Press, 1976).Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Susan McClary, Feminine Endings: Music, Gender, and Sexuality (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1991).Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Cf. Rene Denfeld, The New Victorians: A Young Woman’s Challenge to the Old Feminist Order (NY: Warner Books, 1995), pp. 154–183, 195; Jean Elshtain and S. Tobias, eds. Women, Militarism and War: Essays in History, Politics, and Social Theory (MD: Rowan & Littlefield, 1990), pp. 213–216; Daphne Patai and N. Koertge, Professing Feminism (NY: Basic Books, 1994); Christina Sommers, Who Stole Feminism? (NY: Simon & Schuster, 1994); Warren Shibles, “The Myth of Patriarchy,” Journal of Value Inquiry, vol. 25, no. 4 (1991b), pp. 305–318; Warren Shibles, “Radical Feminism, Humanism and Women’s Studies,” Innovative Higher Education,Vol. 14, no. 1 (1989), pp. 35–47.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    McClary, op. cit., p. 55.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ibid., p. 128.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ibid., p. 130.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Carl Bach, Versuch über die wahre Art das Clavier zu spielen (Berlin: G. Winter, 1759 (1753)).Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Shibles, Warren, Humor: A Critical Analysis for Young People (Whitewater, WI: Language Press, 1978); Shibles, Warren Humor Reference Guide: A Comprehensive Classification and Analysis forthcoming.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Robert Illing, A Dictionary of Music (Baltimore, MD: Penguin, 1950), p. 223.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Bernstein, op. cit., p. 129.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Linda Lowry, “Humor in Instrumental Music,” Ph.D. diss. (OH: Ohio State University, 1974).Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Gretchen Wheelock, Haydn’s Ingenious Jesting with Art: Contexts of Musical Wit and Humor (NY: Schirmer Books, 1992).Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Dewey, op. cit., 1958, p. 4.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Cf. Michael Mitias, “Dewey’s Theory of Expression,” JAAC, Vol. 26, no. 3 (1992), 41–53.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Cf. Harold Osborne, “Expressiveness: Where is the Feeling Found?” BJA, Vol. 23, no. 2 (1983), p. 12.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Dewey, op. cit., 1958, p. 254.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Roger Scruton, “Analytical Philosophy and the Meaning of Music,” JAAC, Vol. 46 (1987), pp. 171–174.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Dewey, op. cit., 1958, p. 40.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Marcia Eaton, Aesthetics and the Good Life (London: Associated Universities Press, 1989), P. 9.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    David Bryant, “A Cognitive Approach to Therapy Through Music,” Journal of Music Therapy, Vol. 24, no. 1 (1987), p. 31.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Eaton, op. cit., p. 174.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Warren Shibles, “Altruism vs. Egoism: A Pseudo-Problem. A Cognitive-Emotive Analysis,” International Journal of Applied Philosophy, Vol. 7, no. 1 (1992), 21–29.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Eaton, op. cit., p. 171.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Wisconsin-WhitewaterUSA

Personalised recommendations