Skip to main content

Constructions as the Subject Matter of Mathematics

  • Chapter
The Foundational Debate

Part of the book series: Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook [1995] ((VCIY,volume 3))

Abstract

The vision informing 20th Century philosophy has been aptly described as one of a desert landscape. Philosophers behave as if in expectation of an ontological tax collector to whom they will owe the less the fewer entities they declare. The metaphysical purge is perpetrated under a banner emblazoned with Occam’s Razor. But Occam never counselled ontological genocide at all cost. He only cautioned against multiplying entities beyond necessity His Razor is thus in full harmony with the complementary principle, known as Menger’s Comb, which cautions against trying to do with less what requires more. The two methodological precepts are just two sides of the same coin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Grossmann, Reinhardt, Meinong, London and Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Russell, Bertrand, “Meinong’s Theory of Complexes and Assumptions (II)” Mind 7 (1904) pp. 336–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wigner, Eugene P., “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 8 (1960), pp. 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tichý, P. (1995). Constructions as the Subject Matter of Mathematics. In: Depauli-Schimanovich, W., Köhler, E., Stadler, F. (eds) The Foundational Debate. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook [1995], vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3327-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3327-4_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4617-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3327-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics