Skip to main content

A Vicarious Victory: Cézanne’s Paintings of Mont Sainte-Victoire and the Dual Nature of Love

  • Chapter
The Elemental Passion for Place in the Ontopoiesis of Life

Part of the book series: Analecta Husserliana ((ANHU,volume 44))

  • 155 Accesses

Abstract

Cézanne’s painting of Mont Sainte-Victoire (c.1904–6) in Philadelphia, stands as a “summa” of the painter’s twenty-year obsession with what he called “le motif” (Figure 1). Perhaps the last painting to come from the painter’s brush, it is nevertheless typical of the numerous other versions Cézanne painted of his beloved mountain during the final years of his life. Seen from the high vantage point of Cézanne’s studio just north of Aix-en-Provence in southern France, the mountain rests atop an expansive horizon. Never had the mountain seemed so majestic and immobile, yet alive and organic; at once rooted firmly to the countryside of Aix while seeming at the same time to disappear into the ethereal blueness of the heavens above.

I would like to thank Profs. Mary Louise Krumrine, George Mauner, Eldon Van Liere, and my wife Amy Yerkes for their support and helpful suggestions in the writing of this article.

Throughout this article I mention and describe works that are not accompanied by illustrations in the present text. In such cases, I either direct the reader to the appropriate source of said illustrations via a footnote or, in the case of Cézanne’s works, I will direct the reader to the standard Catalogue Raisonné reference number(s) found in Lionello Venturi, Cézanne, son art, son oeuvre, 2 volumes (Paris, 1936). Such works mentioned in the text will be followed, in parentheses, by the designation V. and the appropriate number.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Max Raphael, The Demands of Art (Princeton, 1968), p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bernard Dorival, Cézanne,trans. H.H.A. Thackthwaite (New York, 1948), pp. 94–95. In an undated questionnaire Cézanne responded that the writer he most admired was Racine. This document is reproduced in Adrien Chappuis, The Drawings of Cézanne: A Catalogue Raisonné (Greenwich, 1978), pp. 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Emile Zola, The Masterpiece, trans. Thomas Walton (Ann Arbor, 1983 ), p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Paul Cézanne, Correspondance, ed. John Rewald (Paris, 1978), p. 249. See letter to Gasquet of 30 April 1896. Cézanne stated, “Certes, un artiste désire s’élever intellectuellement le plus possible, mais l’homme doit rester obscur.”

    Google Scholar 

  5. Meyer Schapiro, Cézanne (New York, 1952), p. 11. Schapiro was the first to recognize Cézanne’s sublimation of the themes of his early “literal” paintings into the less obvious genres of landscape and still life. See especially his article, “The Apples of Cézanne: An Essay on the Meaning of Still Life”, reprinted in his Modern Art: 19th and 20th Centuries (New York, 1982), pp. 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cézanne, Correspondance,p. 165. Letter to Zola of 14 April 1878.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rewald, p. 269.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cézanne, Correspondance, pp. 226–227. Letter of May 1886.

    Google Scholar 

  9. John Watenhall, “Cézanne’s Mont Sainte-Victoire Seen from Les Lauves”, Pantheon,I, 1982, p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Plutarch, Plutarch’s Lives,Vol. 9, trans. Berandotte Perrin (Cambridge, 1959), p. 511.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carol Solomon Kiefer, “Paul Cézanne, François-Marius Granet and the Provençal Landscape Tradition”, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1987, p. 11. See also Michel Hoog, “Le Motif de la Sainte Victoire”, in Cézanne ou la peinture en jeu,ed. Denis Coutagne (Aix, 1982), pp. 93–105. Hoog acknowledges the confusion surrounding the etymology of Sainte-Victoire but claims that, in any case, the name evokes both the sacred and the victorious, p. 101. He also mentions that it has been suggested that Sainte-Victoire may refer to one Saint Victurien — a proposal that, in my mind, is as unlikely as the association of the mountain with Saint Victor. Since the completion of my dissertation an important exhibition has been held, and its catalogue published, on Cézanne’s Mont Sainte-Victoire pictures. Much of the information I offer here concerning the history of the mountain and origin of its name was independently presented in this catalogue. See: Paul-Albert Février, “Histoire de Victoires”, and Nicole Martin-Vignes, “Pèlerinage”, in Denis Coutagne and Bruno Ely (eds.), Sainte-Victoire Cézanne 1990 (Aix-en-Provence, 1990), pp. 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Archibald Marshall, A Spring Walk in Provence,2nd ed. (New York, 1920), p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Amédée Thierry, Histoire de Gaulois depuis les temps les plus reculés jusq’à l’entière soumission de la gaule à la domination romaine,Vol. 2, 18th ed. (Paris, 1870), pp. 29–30. See also M. Fauris de Saint-Vincens, “Topographie”, Le Magasin encyclopédique, ou journal de sciences, des lettres et des arts, Vol. 4, 1814, pp. 320–321. Fauris de Saint-Vincens claims that the dedication of the temple erected by Marius was at some point rededicated and that “Sainte-Victoire fut nommée la patronne de ce temple”. The identity of this “patronne” is unclear. As there exists no Saint Victoire in the lexicon of saints, the only certainty is that this “patronne” is indeed female. I assert that the patroness of the new “temple” was the Virgin herself.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fauris de Saint-Vincens, pp. 321–322.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thierry, p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Claude Alleau, Les Guides Noirs: Guide de la Provence mysterieuse (Paris, 1965), p. 350. The Carmelites were especially devoted to the Virgin.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Quoted in Gerstle Mack, Paul Cézanne (New York, 1935), pp. 328–329.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sir Walter Scott, Anne of Geierstein (London and New York, 1880), pp. 354–357. In Scott’s historical novel, which was most popular in France in the nineteenth century, the character Thiebault explains the origins of the name Sainte-Victoire. According to him (Scott), the mountain derived its name “from a great victory which was gained by a Roman general, named Caio Mariochwr(133) in gratitude to Heaven for which victory Caio Mario vowed to build a monastery on the mountain, for the service of the Virgin Mary, in honour of whom he had been baptized”, p. 354. Despite the obvious anachronism (one which Scott himself acknowledges) it is clear that, in the nineteenth century, Mont Sainte-Victoire was associated with the Virgin. Unfortunately, I have been unable to locate Scott’s source of information.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Charles Sterling, Le Couronnement de la Vierge (Paris, 1939), pp. 17–18 and the corresponding illustrations.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Émile Littré, Dictionnaire de la langue française,abrégé par A. Beaujean (Vernoy, 1981), p. 1267.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thomas Kselman, Miracles and Prophecies in Nineteenth-Century France (New Brunswick, N.J., 1983), pp. 89, 102, and 166–168. Emphasis mine.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See Bram Dijkstra, The Idols of Perversity (Oxford, 1986), pp. 15–24, especially p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Émile Zola, The Sin of Father Mouret, trans. Sandey Petrey (Lincoln, Nebraska, 1969 ), p. 79.

    Google Scholar 

  24. The Stella Maris was one of the most enduring epithets of the Virgin. According to Albert Boime, Thomas Couture and the Eclectic Vision (New Haven, 1988), p. 249, the image of Mary as Star of the Sea was a prominent image among the Romantics and probably, in part, inspired Couture’s mural Stella Maris in the church of Saint-Eustache in Paris. See Boime, fig. VIII.2, p. 234. I am indebted to George Mauner for leading me to this source.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fauris de Saint-Vincens, p. 321.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Alleau, p. 568.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sidney Geist, Interpreting Cézanne (Cambridge, 1988), pp. 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zola, The Sin of Father Mouret,p. 91.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Geist, p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Michelet’s La Montagne was a huge popular success and went through several editions in its first year. See Edward K. Kaplan, Michelet’s Poetic Vision: A Romantic Philosophy of Nature, Man, and Woman (Amherst, MA, 1977), p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Apparently, while reading Michelet’s L’Oiseau, L’Insecte,and La Montagne,Zola underwent a near mystical experience. See Philip Walker, Zola (London, 1985), p. 79.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jules Michelet, Oeuvres complètes,ed. Paul Viallaneix (Paris), p. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Quoted in Kaplan, p. 137.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gary Neil Wells, “Metaphorical Relevance and Thematic Continuity in the Early Paintings of Paul Cézanne”, Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University, 1987, p. 214.

    Google Scholar 

  35. J.W. Goethe, Faust,trans. Walter Kaufman (Garden City and New York, 1963), p. 502. All quotations are from this edition.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Goethe, J. W., Faust, trans. Bayard Taylor. Marshall Montgomery and Douglas Yates (London, 1963 ), p. 446.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hans Eichner, “The Eternal Feminine: An Aspect of Goethe’s Ethics”, Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, ser. 4, no. 9, 1971, pp. 234–244. Reprinted in Faust, trans. Walter Arndt, ed. Cyrus Hamlin (New York, 1976 ), p. 624.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Schapiro, “The Apples of Cézanne”, p. 38, 91 n. Schapiro likens Cézanne’s picture to J. A. Van Dyck’s Hommage to Venus in Karlsruhe. Both compositional and thematic similarities between the two works suggest familiarity and an influence must be assumed. However, I have not been able to uncover direct evidence that Cézanne had actually seen this work. Moreover, Wells has discovered that Cézanne’s painting conforms fairly closely to an episode in Faust where Helen is described before a canopied throne surrounded by admirers. See: Wells, pp. 214–218. If this is indeed the case, then it would be highly probable that Cézanne would see Helen as a Venus type and conflate the symbolic meanings of the two.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rewald, p. 123. According to Rewald’s research, Marie was apparently a “devout spinster”.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Charles Baudelaire, Oeuvres complètes, ed. Y.-G. Le Dantec, rev. by Claude Pichot (Paris, 1961 ), p. 1223.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Émile Zola, Les Rougon-Macquart,ed. Henri Mitterand, Vol. 4 (Paris, 1966), p. 201.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Richard Wagner, Tannhäuser, cond. Erick Leinsdorf, The Metropolitan Opera, Decca, 1971. English translation by Peggie Cochrane.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Baudelaire, Oeuvres complètes,p. 1219.

    Google Scholar 

  44. That Cézanne in this picture has associated the earth with death via the stark tonal juxtaposition of the quarry and the mountain may be, in part, explained by a local Aixois tradition. Mary Tompkins Lewis has discovered that there was a long-standing fascination in Aix with death imagery. In the nineteenth century several archeological excavations of the environs of Aix uncovered evidence of a primitive “Celtic Ligurian culture in which the tête de mort was venerated and thought to protect its worshipers.” Lewis goes on to say that pillars hewn from the Bibemus quarry (the very quarry depicted by Cézanne) were decorated with death’s heads. These artifacts were exhibited at the Musée Granet during the artist’s lieftime. See Mary Tompkins Lewis, Cézanne’s Early Imagery (Berkeley, 1989 ), pp. 40–43.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Quoted in Roald Nasgaard, The Mystic North: Symbolist Landscape Painting in Northern Europe and North America, 1890–1940 (Toronto, 1984), pp. 138–139.

    Google Scholar 

  46. The early letters between Cézanne and Zola contain numerous references to Dante. See, for example, Zola, Correspondance,pp. 130 and 140.

    Google Scholar 

  47. According to Ciardi, “Venus represents love [and] leads the way and that Divine illumination follows it.” See Dante, The Purgatorio,trans. John Ciardi (New York, 1961), p. 37. See Canto I, 19–21. Moreover, later in the Purgatorio,Virgil and Dante encounter two trees (one in Canto XXII and the other in Canto XXIII). According to Francis Fergusson, Dante’s Drama of the Mind (Princeton, 1953), p. 141, these trees are an obvious allusion to both the Tree of Knowledge and the Tree of Death which “symbolize, both in their natural and historic aspects, the paradoxes of human nourishment: nourishment for the flesh and for the spirit; delight and renunciation, feast and sacrifice in one.”

    Google Scholar 

  48. See Figure 8, p. 246, in Robert Pincus-Witten, Occult Symbolism in France: Joséphin Peladan and the Salons de la Rose-Croix (New York, 1976), p. 102. The rose was also, not surprisingly, a traditional attribute of Venus as well. See, for example, J.C. Cooper, An Illustrated Encyclopedia of Traditional Symbols (London, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Losch, M. (1995). A Vicarious Victory: Cézanne’s Paintings of Mont Sainte-Victoire and the Dual Nature of Love. In: Tymieniecka, AT. (eds) The Elemental Passion for Place in the Ontopoiesis of Life. Analecta Husserliana, vol 44. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3298-7_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3298-7_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4376-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3298-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics