Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Struggle for Power in the New Regime (1949–1954)

  • Chapter
Book cover The Difficult Flowering of Surinam

  • 49 Accesses

Abstract

Although the color-line/class struggle among Creoles had been submerged to some extent in the Kielstra years, the NPS victories over its opposition in the electoral reform, and in the general elections of 1949, brought with them a new flare-up of Van Lier’s “latent animosity.” Ironically, but also logically, its locus was the NPS itself. A struggle for power between rival cliques within the party was quickly transformed into a color-line/class struggle, as the newest members of the party attacked the old guard for alleged elitism.

The NPS is the focus of everyone’s attention. She is being tugged and jerked in all directions. That she has remained firmly upright is certainly not to be credited to the good intentions of her opponents, nor, sadly, to the efforts of a few of her so-called supporters.

Purcy Wijngaarde, 1949*

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. van de Walle, interview, Hilversum, April 2, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ormskirk, op. cit., pp. 66–68.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mitrasing, op. cit., p. 161; De West, January 17, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mitrasing, op. cit., p. 161.

    Google Scholar 

  5. DW, February 21, 1949. De West, in response, noted that Creoles had indeed voted a Hindustani into the Staten (in 1930) — the ex-headteacher, lawyer, and civil servant, C.R. Biswamitre. Biswamitre, a Catholic, had been an early member of Unie Suriname. But after the war he had worked for Radio Nederland and had kept aloof from party politics (interview, Amsterdam, July 30, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Letter from the PBIS executive committee to De West, July 14, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  7. DW, December 1, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mitrasing, op. cit., p. 167.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ormskirk, op. cit., p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Interview, Jacques Lemmer (“Pa Lern”), Paramaribo, February 5, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. van der Schroeff (the party’s chairman), P. Wijngaarde, O. Wong, and L.A. Lauriers. E. de la Fuente, W. Bos Verschuur and Findlay had also joined the party by this time.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mitrasing, op. cit., p. 162.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid., p. 163.

    Google Scholar 

  14. ZW, May 6, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  15. ZW, May 13, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  16. ZW, May 20, 1949. DW, May 25, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mitrasing, op. cit., p. 165.

    Google Scholar 

  18. ZW, June 1, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Interviews, Jacques Lemmer, Paramaribo, February 5, 1974; A.L. Smit, Epse, Netherlands, March 16, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gastmann, op. cit., p. 179.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ibid., p. 180.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid., p. 180–81.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ooft, Ontwikkeling..., p. 156.

    Google Scholar 

  25. DW, July 25, 1949. See also Ooft, Ontwikkeling..., pp. 156–57.

    Google Scholar 

  26. DW, July 29, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  27. DW, July 27, 1949; Ooft, Ontwikkeling..., p. 157.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Technically, the Dutch Second Chamber had not violated any constitutional law. The Interim Orders, which would only go into effect in January 1950, safeguarded Surinam’s control over legislation concerning internal affairs, but did not give it the power to amend its own constitution. This was one of the changes yet to be made (by the 1954 Statute). For an analysis of the constitutional issues involved in this matter, see Ooft, Ontwikkeling..., pp. 149, 153–61.

    Google Scholar 

  29. ZW, September 14, 1949; Ooft, Ontwikkeling..., p. 159.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ooft, Ontwikkeling..., p. 160.

    Google Scholar 

  31. DW, January 23, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  32. DW, June 13, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ormskirk, op. cit., p. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  34. DW, December 7, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  35. DW, September 14, 1949; October 3, 1949; and March 29, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  36. DW, September 19, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  37. DW, December 5, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  38. DW, January 18, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  39. DW, December 12, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ormskirk, op. cit., p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  41. DW, January 9, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  42. DW, September 16, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Interview, Bos Verschuur, January 28, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  44. “Indieningsbrief van Lou Lichtveld” (Paramaribo, September 28, 1949), cited in Ormskirk, op. cit., p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  45. DW, July 7, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  46. DW, March 20, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  47. DW, March 22, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  48. DW, March 27, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  49. DW, March 29, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  50. DW, April 3, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  51. DW, April 11, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  52. DW, April 14, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ibid, confirmed by F.E.M. Mitrasing in communication (February 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  54. DW, April 21, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  55. DW, April 26, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Interview, Jagernath Lachmon, January 16, 1974. Ironically, Dr. Van Ommeren was the first to treat Lachmon after his collapse in the S taten (interview, A.L. Smit, March 16, 1976, Epse, Netherlands).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Mitrasing, op. cit., p. 198.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ibid., p. 199.

    Google Scholar 

  59. DW, April 12, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  60. DW, June 12, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  61. DW, March 1, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  62. DW, March 20, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  63. DW, July 7, 1950. Lachmon was still hospitalized and was unable to vote.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Emile de la Fuente, a shrewd, but well-liked, theatre showman, announced that, though he disagreed with the party and had to resign, he would continue to make his Bellevue Theatre available to the NPS for its meetings (DW, July 6, 1950). Mitrasing says that the NPS was ready to expel all those voting for the Government, and that, in addition, they would boycott De la Fuente’s theatre (op. cit., p. 204).

    Google Scholar 

  65. For a discussion of these problems, see Ooft, Ontwikkeling..., pp. 244–47.

    Google Scholar 

  66. DW, July 7, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  67. DW, July 10, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  68. DW, July 11, 12, 13, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  69. DW, July 14, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Besides criticism, appeals for reconciliation were also heard. In a letter to De West, A.J. MacMay, an NPS-member, wrote that “People say that the struggle now underway is between intellectuals and the people, meaning Creole intellectuals against Creole masses. They forget that there is only one interest that must bind all Creoles: self-preservation through unity.” (DW, July 21, 1950)

    Google Scholar 

  71. DW, July 29, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  73. DW, September 11, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  74. DW, October 7, 1950; and Ormskirk, op. cit., p. 88.

    Google Scholar 

  75. DW, October 10, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  77. DW, October 20, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  78. DW, October 19, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  79. DW, November 10, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  80. This involved application of Article 174 of the 1950 Surinamese Staatsregeling, which declared that whenever an organ of the government was unable to fulfill its’ constitutional functions, a Dutch law can establish which law-making authority shall replace it (cited in Mitrasing, op. cit., p. 210).

    Google Scholar 

  81. DW, November 16, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  82. DW, November 18, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  83. DW, November 25, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  84. DW, November 24, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  85. DW, December 5, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  86. DW, December 8, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  87. DW, December 9, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  89. DW, December 18, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  90. DW, December 22, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  91. DW, January 12, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  92. DW, January 6, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  93. DW, January 15, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Gastmann, op. cit., p. 185; Mitrasing, op. cit., p. 214.

    Google Scholar 

  95. DW, August 18, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Gastmann, op. cit., p. 186.

    Google Scholar 

  97. DW, January 20, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  98. DW, January 23, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  99. DW, January 29, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  100. The issue remained a thorny one, however. Those who had opted for Indonesian nationality did lose their right to vote — only those who had not opted one way or another could still vote. The Dutch passed another law in 1954 to enable Indonesian citizens to regain their Dutch nationality, and this was put into effect in Surinam later that year (Gastmann, op. cit., pp. 186).

    Google Scholar 

  101. DW, August 30, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  102. DW, September 23, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  103. DW, December 22, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  104. DW, February 13, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Mitrasing, op. cit., p. 215.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Ibid.,p.2\S.

    Google Scholar 

  107. DW, March 22, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Mitrasing, op. cit., p. 220.

    Google Scholar 

  109. A.L. Smit reports that Findlay and Lim A Po had their own list of candidates for the Cabinet and that the result was a series of difficult compromises. (Interview, March 16, 1976, Epse, Netherlands).

    Google Scholar 

  110. DW, June 14, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  111. DW, May 9, 10, 22 et passim, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  112. With this announcement, the Staten quickly appointed a delegation composed of Lim A Po, Pengel, Bergen and Findlay (NPS), Lachmon and Shriemisier (VHP), M.A. Karamat Ali and Soemita (KTPI) and Jongbaw (PSV) (DW, July 27, 1951). But the Dutch weren’t in any hurry to move, calling instead for a Study Commission to prepare an agenda for the meeting which would be held in 1952 (DW, October 11, 1951). To this “proto-delegation”, the government named Buiskool, Lim A Po, Pos, Jongbaw and H. de Vries (who had replaced Pos as Surinam Representative in the Hague).

    Google Scholar 

  113. Quoted in Gastmann, op. cit., pp. 205–06.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Ibid., p. 206.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Ibid., pp. 206–07.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Ibid., p. 207.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Ibid., pp. 207–08.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Ibid., p. 208.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Reprinted in DW, June 25, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  120. DW, June 25, 1952. The group was led by E.A. Gessel, C. Defaris, and the young law student, Eddy Bruma (DW, June 11, 1952). A Surinam-Antillean bi-weekly, De Westindiër, published in The Netherlands, defended the students against the “Communist” charges, and warned critics of the Surinamese delegation’s performance at the RTC against using “cheap” political charges. (July 4, 1952, p. 1; July 18, 1952, p. 1.)

    Google Scholar 

  121. DW, July 4, 1952; August 12, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  122. DW, July 4, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Ibid. A.L. Smit recalls that Pengel and Lim A Po visited him at this time, proposing full independence, with Lim A Po as President and Pengel Prime Minister. “I told them they were fools.” Shortly thereafter Lim A Po had a severe heart attack and was forced to resign his seat in the Staten. (Interview, March 16, 1976, Epse, The Netherlands).

    Google Scholar 

  124. DW, August 27, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Mitrasing, op. cit., p. 240.

    Google Scholar 

  126. DW, December 31, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Gastmann, op. cit., note 2, p. 210.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Ibid., p. 211.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Ibid., pp. 211–13. No change was made in the other provision, giving the Dutch Prime Minister a tie-breaking vote in deadlocked Kingdom legislation.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Ibid., p. 213.

    Google Scholar 

  131. Though the status of the overseas territories was less than sovereign, the United Nations accepted their argument that this had been a voluntary association, and thus exempted the Netherlands from the duty of reporting annually to the Secretary-General. Gastmann describes the United Nations deliberations on this, ibid., pp. 215–32.

    Google Scholar 

  132. Adhin, op. cit., pp. 115.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Edward Dew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dew, E. (1978). The Struggle for Power in the New Regime (1949–1954). In: The Difficult Flowering of Surinam. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3278-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3278-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-2057-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3278-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation