Appendix: Interpretationism and Mental Realism

  • Marc Slors
Part of the Philosophical Studies Series book series (PSSP, volume 86)


There may seem to be a strong parallel between the position outlined in the latter half of the last chapter and a position known as ‘interpretationism.’ Interpretationism is widely considered to be at odds with mental realism. Since I want to defend the claim that my position is at least compatible with realism about the mental, it is imperative that the extent to which the parallel holds and the extent to which it doesn’t are clearly stated. That is my first aim in this postscript. A second aim, equally important, is to give a further articulation of the view presented above through a comparison with a well known position.


Mental State Social Reality Intentional Stance Theoretical Entity Logical Construct 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    The theory is elaborately expounded in Dennett 1978, 1987.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dennett 1991b.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dennett 1987, pp. 43–68.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cf. e.g. Dibrell (1988) on the ‘as if’ character of interpretationism.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Philosophical Investigations,Part II, p.iv.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    See for further criticism of Dennett my Slors 1996.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    See Dennett, 1991b.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc Slors
    • 1
  1. 1.Royal Dutch Academy for the Arts and SciencesUniversity of NijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations