Abstract
In Edmund Husserl’s confidential diary published by Walter Biemel there occurs under the date of September 25, 1906 the following isolated reference to the name Amiel:
Hold yourself ready for the great purpose and be prepared. Cf. Amiel and the many beautiful words of Carlyle.2
From Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 49 (1967), 201–14.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Persönliche Aufzeichnungen,“ Philosophy and Phenomenological Researcn XVI (1956), 300.
See now the Postscript 1966 for the solution of the puzzle.
Tagebiicher. Deutsch von Dr. Rosa Schapiro. München und Leipzig, R. Piper and Co., 1905.
Persönliche Aufzeichnungen, Ibid.,p. 294f.
Ernst Merriam-Genast, Arnie! inr Spiegel der europaeschen Kritik 1881–1931, Marburg (Lahn) 1931, especially p. 165f.; Hedwig Hilz, Amid und die Deutschen,Münster 1930, p. 61ff.
Marvin Farber, ed., Philosophic Thought in France and the United States,Buffalo 1950. p. 67.
Henri-Frédéric Amiel, Fragments d’un journal intime, ed. Bernard Bouvier, Paris, Editions Stock, 1949, p. 81.
For another unexplained reference, see I. M. Bochenski, Die zeitgenössischen Denkmethoden, München, Lehnen Verlag, 1959, p. 22.
It is a matter of profound regret that according to a letter I received from Monsieur Bopp this edition, after three volumes, has come to a halt.
February 4, 1881, ed. Bouvier, p. 504.
Bouvier, p. 83.
Ibid.
Bouvier. p. 188.
Scherer I, 235 (Henri-Frédéric Amiel, Fragments d’un journal intime. Genève 1884).
Bouvier, p. 250.
Bouvier, p. 171.
Scherer I, 234.
An allusion to a celebrated passage in the second part of Goethe’s Faust (lines 621ff.), repeated in other parts of the Journal,and, incidentally, quite often in Husserl’s writings.
September 9, 1880; Bouvier, p. 484f.
Bouvier, pp. 371, 423f., 507.
August 20, 1860; Bouvier, p. 139.
E. g., September 9, 1850 (B., p. 50); August 20, 1869 (B., p. 243); May 31, 1876 (B., p. 370); July 8, 1880 (B., p. 477).
April 23, 1871 (B., p. 282); February 3, 1862 (B., p. 153).
Scherer I, 234f.
August 31, 1856 (B., p. 115); May 31, 1880 (B., p. 46).
September 4, 1873 (B., p. 325).
July 26, 1857 (B., p. 122f.).
August 14, 1869 (B., p. 243).
July 3, 1874 (B., p. 342); also May 2, 1877 (B., p. 398).
April 23, 1871 (B., p. 283).
September 27, 1871 (B., p. 74).
July 12, 1876 (B.; p. 371).
May 11, 1853 (B., p. 87).
About these possibilities see also the article by Georges Poulet, La Rêverie tournoyante d’ Amiel, Les Temps Modernes XVII (1961) pp. 1–51, based largely on unpublished material.
For another reference to this “expansion” see also the entry to the Journal of May 11, 1853 (B., p. 86).
February 3, 1862 (B., p. 153).
See my The Phenomenological Movement. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, Second edition, 1965, p. 140f.
Bouvier, p. 21.
Apparently an error of the English translation; in Scherer and Bouvier the date is March 26, 1851.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1981 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Spiegelberg, H. (1981). Amiel’s “New Phenomenology”. In: The Context of the Phenomenological Movement. Phaenomenologica, vol 80. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3270-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3270-3_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8262-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3270-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive