Skip to main content

Comparing Spatial Estimation Techniques for Precipitation Analysis

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Water Science and Technology Library ((WSTL,volume 10/3))

Abstract

Precipitation data from Columbia River Basin was analyzed using different spatial estimation techniques. Kriging, Locally weighted regression (lowess) and Smoothing Spline ANOVA (SS-ANOVA) were used to analyze the data. Log(precipitation) was considered as a function of easting, northing and elevation. Analysis by kriging considered precipitation only as a function of easting and northing. Various quantitative measures of comparisons were considered like maximum absolute deviation, residual sum of squares and scaled variance of deviation. Analyses suggested that SS-ANOVA and lowess performed better than kriging. Residual plots showed that the distribution of residuals was tighter for SS-ANOVA than for lowess and kriging. Precipitation seemed to have an increasing trend with elevation but seemed to stabilize after certain elevation. Analysis was also done for Willamette River Basin data. Similar results were observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akin, O.O(1992) “A comparative study of nonparametric regression and kriging for analyzing groundwater contamination data”, M.S. Thesis, Utah State University, Logan, Utah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, D.S., Binghan, G.E., Lall, U., Tarboton, D.G., Al-Adhami, M., Jensen, D.T., McCurdy, G.D., and Jayyousi, E.F. (1991) “Development of mountain climate generator and snow pack model for erosion predictions in the western United States using WEPP”, Project report - I II.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, W.S. (1979) “Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatter plots”, Journal of American Statistical Association 74, 368, 829–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, W.S., and Devlin, S.J. (1988) “Locally weighted regression: an approach to regression analysis by local fitting”, Journal of American Statistical Association 83, 403, 596–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, W.S., Devlin, S.J., and Grosse, E. (1988) “Regression by local fitting”, Journal of Economics 37, 88–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N. (1991) Statistics for Spatial Data, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Marsily, G. (1986) Quantitative Hydrogeology, Groundwater Hydrology for Engineers, Academic Press, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, C. (1989) “Rkpack and its applications: fitting smoothing spline models”, Technical Report 857, University of Wisconsin - Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, C. and Wahba, G. (1992) “Smoothing spline ANOVA with component-wise Bayesian confidence intervals”, Technical report 881 (rev.), University of Wisconsin - Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaaks, E.H., and Srivastava, R.M. (1989) An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Journel, A.G. (1977) “Iiriging in terms of projections”, Journal of Mathematical Geology 9, 6, 563–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Journel, A.G. (1989) Fundamentals of Geostatistics in five lessons, American Geophysical Union, Washington, D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimeldorf, G., and Wahba, G. (1971) “Some results on Tchebycheffian spline functions”, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Probability 33, 82–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krige, D. G. (1951) “A statistical approach to some mine valuations and allied problems in Witwaterstrand” unpublished Masters’ Thesis, University of Witwaterstrand, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, H.G. (1987) “Weighted local regression and kernel methods for nonparametric curve fitting”, Journal of American Statistical Association 82, 397, 231–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D.L., Dolph, J., and Marks, D. (1991) “Evaluation of geostatistical procedures for spatial analysis of precipitation”, USEPA Report, Corvallis, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahba, G. (1990) Spline Models for Observational Data, SIAM series in Applied Mathematics, Pennsylvania.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yakowitz, S., and Szidarovszky, R. (1985) “A comparison of kriging with nonparametric regression methods”, Journal of Multivariate Analysis 16, 1, 21–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Satagopan, J., Rajagopalan, B. (1994). Comparing Spatial Estimation Techniques for Precipitation Analysis. In: Hipel, K.W., McLeod, A.I., Panu, U.S., Singh, V.P. (eds) Stochastic and Statistical Methods in Hydrology and Environmental Engineering. Water Science and Technology Library, vol 10/3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3083-9_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3083-9_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4379-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3083-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics