Abstract
By cognitive modes we mean here those processes or dynamic relationships in which the cognitive elements dealt with in the previous section are included.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Osnovy, p. 173. Cf. also A. M. Korsunov’s attack (FN 1962, 2, 83–90) on Andreev’s and Rutkevii ‘s Dialekticeskij materializm (Moskva. 1959) because they limited sense-generalization to the representation. According to Korsunov, the dialectic of singular and general is already in sensation (the distinction of some properties of the thing from the others) and perception (holistic unity of distinct sensations).
Osnovy, loc.cit.
S. L. Rubinstejn: Principy i puti razvitija psixologii. Moskva. 1959. p. 89.
In VF 1958, 1, 39–46.
Osnovy, p. 330.
Ibid., p. 331.
B. G. Anan’ev: Teorija osculenija. Leningrad. 1961. p. 31.
Cf. Filosofskaja enciklopedija vol. 1, pp. 301–302
Abstrakcija has the same double use as the English `abstraction’, i.e. indicating a process or its result.
Filosofskaja enciklopedija, vol. 1, pp. 12–13.
B. M. Kedrov distinguishes five sorts or levels in `O sootno§enii form dvitenija materii v prirode’ (On the Inter-relation of the Forms of the Motion of Matter in Nature). VF 1959, 4, p. 52. Of late mathematical abstraction is much in vogue: cf. G. I. Ruzavin: `O xaraktere matematiceskoj abstrakcii’ (On the Character of Mathematical Abstraction). VF 1960, 9, 143–154.
Andreev: Osnovy,p. 202.
Cf. the article by A. A. Zinov’ev in Filosofskaja enciklopedija vol. 1, pp. 295–298. See, also E. V. Il’enkov: Dialektika abstraktnogo i konkretnogo v “Kapitale” Marksa. Moskva. 1960. and M. M. Rozental’: Voprosy dialektiki v “Kapitale” Marksa. Moskva. 1955. In VF 1962, 3, p. 89, V S Kazakovcev suggests a vosxoïdenie of konkretnogo Jerez abstraktnoe k konkretnomu.
Filosofskaja enciklopedija, vol. 1, pp. 301–302.
Cf. the works cited in note 13 (above). P. P. Z`upin (FN 1962, 1, 80–87) maintains that practice is the most universal of universals because its universality (a) precedes that of thought, (b) is richer than that of thought, (c) is direct. For a verbose but clear treatment of all aspects of abstraction, see G. A. Gevorkjan: O roli abstrakcii v poznanii. Erevan. 1957.
Osnovy, p. 328.
Ibid., p. 327.
Cf. Andreev: Osnovy, p. 179ff. Osnovy, p. 327ff. and V. S. S`vyrev in VF 1961, 3, 74–85.
VF 1954, 4, 48–59.
FN 1958, 2, 106–120.
Cf. Osnovnye voprosy teorii gipotezy (Basic Questions of the Theory of Hypothesis). Moskva. 1961. and his article: ‘O gipoteze v estestvoznanii’ (On the Hypothesis in Natural Science). VF 1962, 9, 154–164.
Filosofskaja enciklopedija, vol. 1, p. 371.
Andreev: Osnovy,p. 187.
Ideja i ee rol’ v poznanii’ (The Idea and its Role in Knowledge). VF 1959, 9, 53–64.
Osnovy, p. 202.
Cf. Osnovy,pp. 202–208 and Filosofskaja enciklopedija,vol. 1, pp. 301–302.
Osnovy, p. 208. Strangely enough, the authors use zakon instead of the usual zakonomernost’. Cf. also I. D. Andreev: `Materialisti.ceskaja dialektika kak teorija poznanija i dialekticeskaja logika’ (The Materialist Dialectic as Theory of Knowledge and Dialectical Logic). In Voprosy teorii poznanija i logiki. Moskva. 1960. p. 81.
Andreev: Osnovy,p. 180.
Rol’ analogii v poznanii (On the Role of Analogy in Knowledge). Moskva. 1961. p. 7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1964 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blakeley, T.J. (1964). Basic Cognitive Modes. In: Soviet Theory of Knowledge. Sovietica, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3036-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3036-5_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8325-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3036-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive