Abstract
Windows delineating tolerable or “acceptable” conditions associated with climate change can be defined in terms of a variety of parameters; a preliminary window offered by the Scientific Advisory Council on Global Change of the Federal Government of Germany sets limits on temperature change and the rate of temperature change. Investment in adaptation can alter the size and shape of these windows, and different emissions trajectories are associated with different limiting points on their boundaries. As a result, the value of adaptation depends upon both the underlying structure of the tolerable window and the basecase emissions trajectory. Given uncertainty about both, the best near-term policy should be cast in a sequential decision-making framework. Seen in this light, improved adaptive potential can either reduce the cost of sustaining tolerable climate change or increase the opportunity cost of holding to more restrictive boundaries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Enquette Kommission (EK): 1991, `Protecting the Earth: A Status Report with Recommendations for a New Energy Policy’ in Preventive Measures to Protect the Earth’s Atmosphere, German Bundestag, Bonn, Germany.
Enquette Kommission (EK): 1994, ‘Schlussbericht der Enquette Kommission “Schutz der Erdatmosphäre’ in Protecting the Earth’s Atmosphere, Bundestag, Bonn, Germany.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): 1992, Climate Change 1992: Supplemental Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): 1996, Report of Working Group I, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Manne, A., Mendelsohn, R., and Richels, R.: 1995, `MERGE: A Model for Evaluating Regional and Global Effects of GI-IG Reduction Policies’, Energy Policy 23, 17–34.
Nordhaus, W.: 1994, Managing the Global Commons, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Rijsberman, F. and Swart, R.: 1990, Targets and Indicators of Climate Change, Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Schnellnhuber, H.J. and Yohe, G.: 1997, `Comprehending the Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change by Integrated Assessment’, World Climate Research Programme, Geneva.
Reilly, J. and Schimmelpfennig, D.: 2000, `Irreversibility, uncertainty and learning: portraits of adaptation to long-term climate change’, Climatic Change, this issue.
Toth, F. L., Bruckner, T., Fussel, H. M., Leimbach, M., Petschel-Held, G. and Schellnhuber, H.J.: 1998, `The Tolerable Windows Approach to Integrated Assessments’ in O.K. Cameron, Fukuwatari, K. and Morita, T. (eds.), Climate Change and Integrated Assessment Models [JAMS] - Bridging the Gap, Center for Global Environmental Research, Environmental Agency of Japan, Tsukuba, Japan.
WBGU (Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveranderungen): 1995a, Szenario zur Ableitung globaler CO2-Reductionsziele and Umsetzungstrategien, Bremerhaver, Germany (February).
WBGU: 1995b, Scenarios for the Derivation of Global CO2 Reduction Targets and Implementation Strategies, Bremerhaven, Germany (March).
WBGU: 1996a, Welt im Wandel: Wege zur Losung globaler Umweltprobleme, Springer, Berlin, Germany.
WBGU: 1996b, World in Transition: Ways Towards Global Environmental Solutions, Springer, Berlin, Germany.
WBGU: 1997a, Ziele fur den Klimaschutz 1997, Bremerhaven, Germany.
WBGU: 1997b, Targets for Climate Protection 1997, Bremerhaven, Germany.
Wigley, T., Richels, R., and Edmonds, J.: 1996, `Economic and Environmental Choices in Stabilization of Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations’, Nature 369, 240–243.
Yohe, G.: 1990, `The Cost of Not Holding Back the Sea: Toward a National Sample of Economic Vulnerability’, Coastal Management 18, 403–431.
Yohe, G.: 1996, `Selecting `Interesting’ Scenarios with which to Analyze Policy Response to Potential Climate Change’, Climate Research 1, 169–177.
Yohe, G. and Wallace, R.: 1996, `Near Term Mitigation Policy for Global Change Under Uncertainty: Minimizing the Expected Cost of Meeting Unknown Concentration Thresholds’, Environmental Modeling and Assessment 1, 47–57.
Yohe, G., Neumann, J., Marshall, P., and Ameden, H.: 1996, `The Economic Cost of Greenhouse Induced Sea Level Rise for Developed Property in the United States’, Climatic Change 32, 387–410.
Yohe, G. and Schlesinger, M.: 1998, `Sea Level Change: The Expected Cost of Protection or Abandonment in the United States’, Climatic Change 38, 437–472.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yohe, G., Toth, F.L. (2000). Adaptation and the Guardrail Approach to Tolerable Climate Change. In: Kane, S.M., Yohe, G.W. (eds) Societal Adaptation to Climate Variability and Change. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3010-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3010-5_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5494-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3010-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive