Abstract
Few disputes have dominated the discourse of analytic philosophy like the one between Rudolf Carnap and Willard Van Orman Quine. Centered originally on the issue of intensionality in the philosophy of logic and language — ultimately the import of the distinction between analytic and synthetic statements — their conflict came to concern the nature of post-foundational epistemology and its relation to ontology. Are we to follow Carnap and explicate the conditions of intersubjectively meaningful speech in a purely formal inquiry that, taken by itself, refrains from underwriting any one such framework? Or are we to follow Quine and naturalize epistemology as an empirical inquiry into the conditions of theory acceptance and thus, perforce, acquiesce in ontological commitments? Perhaps not the least pressing question is whether there is any “cognitive” conflict at all between Carnapean reconstructionism and Quinean naturalism.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Uebel, T.E. (1993). Dear Carnap, Dear Van. W. V. Quine and Rudolf Carnap. The Quine-Carnap Correspondence and Related Work. Ed., with an Introduction by Richard Creath. Berkeley-Los Angeles-London: University of California Press 1990, xv + 384 pp. In: Stadler, F. (eds) Scientific Philosophy: Origins and Developments. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook [1993], vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2964-2_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2964-2_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4332-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2964-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive