Skip to main content

The Government of Military R&D in Britain

  • Chapter
Science, Technology and the Military

Part of the book series: Sociology of the Sciences ((SOSC,volume 12/1/2))

Abstract

Military science and technology have not been much studied in Britain by the science studies community. There is very little work in the economics of research and development (R&D), the politics of science and technology, or the sociology of science on this subject. Nor have the parent disciplines of economics, politics, or sociology devoted as much attention to defense R&D matters as the subject deserves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes and References

  1. For example, Council for Science and Society, UK Military R&D (report of a working group: rapporteur, P. Gummett) (London: Oxford University Press, 1986 ).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Statement on the Defence Estimates 1986 (London: HMSO, Cmnd. 9763–1, 1986), para. 520–1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cabinet Office, Annual Review of Government Funded R&D 1985 (London: HMSO, 1985), table 7.1.

    Google Scholar 

  4. David Weston and Philip Gummett, “The Economic Impact of Military RD: Hypotheses, Evidence and Verification,” Defence Analysis (1987, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 63–76); and Mary Kaldor, Margaret Sharp, and William Walker, “Industrial Competitiveness and Britain’s Defence,” Lloyds Bank Review, No. 162 (October 1986), 39.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Central Organisation for Defence (London: HMSO, Cmnd. 6923, 1946), cited in M. Edmonds (ed.), Central Organisations of Defence (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1985), pp. 87–88.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. N. Chester and F. M. G. Willson, The Organisation of British Central Government 1914–1964 ( London: Allen and Unwin, for Royal Institute of Public Administration, 1968 ), pp. 236–239.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Edmonds, op. cit.,1985 (5) p. 88.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Government Organisation for Defence Procurement and Civil Aerospace (Rayner Report) (London: HMSO, Cmnd. 4641, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  9. The Central Organisation for Defence (London: HMSO, Cmnd. 9315, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  10. See document DO (49)62, discussed at Cabinet, Defence Committee, Minutes, 7 December 1949, London, Public Record Office, CAB 131 /8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Report by the Committee on the Organisation and Work of the Scientific Branches of the Ministry of Supply and Admiralty“ (Garrod Report), 1951, London, Public Record Office, DEFE 7/282, paragraph 98.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See, for example, Cabinet, Defence Committee, Minutes, 25 May 1950, London, Public Record Office, CAB 131 /8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Further details of MoD organisation can be found in Council for Science and Society, op. cit.,1986 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. D. Scott, Vickers, A History ( London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1962 ), pp. 301–302.

    Google Scholar 

  15. The Times,13 November 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Margaret Gowing, Independence and Deterrence: Britain and Atomic Energy 1946–1952 (London: Macmillan, 1974), vol. 2, pp. 155–159.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cabinet, Defence Committee, Minutes, 1 July 1949, London, Public Record Office, CAB 131 /8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. House of Commons, Second Report from the Defence Committee, Session 198586, Statement on the Defence Estimates 1986 (London: HMSO, HC 399, 1986 ), p. 143.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cabinet Office, op. cit.,1985 (3), data on UGC and research council spending in part II; and Cmnd. 9763-II (2), table 3.2.

    Google Scholar 

  20. National Audit Office, Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, Ministry of Defence: Management of Work at Research Establishments (London: HMSO, HC 462, 1986 ), p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  21. For a fairly comprehensive bibliographic guide, see David Edgerton and Philip Gummett, “Science, Technology and Economics in the 20th Century,” in G. Jordan (ed.), British Military History: A Guide to the Recent Literature; A Supplement to Higham’s Guide to the Sources of British Military History ( New York: Garland, 1988 ), pp. 477–499.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See, for example, Financial Times, 10 December 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A good general account is given in L. Freedman, Britain and Nuclear Weapons ( London: Macmillan, 1980 ).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cited in ibid.,p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  25. House of Commons, Committee of Public Accounts, 1981–82, Ministry of Defence Chevaline Improvement to the Polaris Missile System (London: HMSO, HC 269, 1982), pp. vi—vii.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Solly Zuckerman, Nuclear Illusion and Reality ( London: Collins, 1982 ), p. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ibid.,p. 106.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ibid.,p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rayner Report, op. cit. (8), para. 16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gummett, P. (1988). The Government of Military R&D in Britain. In: Mendelsohn, E., Smith, M.R., Weingart, P. (eds) Science, Technology and the Military. Sociology of the Sciences, vol 12/1/2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2958-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2958-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8455-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2958-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics