Abstract
The equation of the idea of objectivity with that of scientific objectivity is popular. Thus, what we deem not fully objective we demote to the status of non-science. Objectivity thus prescribes unanimity. All should agree about it except for those whom we disregard: the ignorant, the vicious, or those who are otherwise at fault. Hence, if scientific politics is possible, it should prescribe unanimity among all who count. Otherwise, we should deem subjective all politics, especially party-politics. And then, the decision regarding party affiliation becomes a matter of mere taste. All this seems to be a clear-cut conclusion from the equation of science with objectivity. This equation rules out both rationality and pluralism, and, finally, democracy too. It is shaky, then, to say the least.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Joseph Agassi
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Agassi, J. (2003). Science, Politics and Objectivity. In: Science and Culture. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 231. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2946-8_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2946-8_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6234-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2946-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive