Skip to main content

Considering Serious Hazards in Forest Management Decision-Making

  • Chapter
Risk Analysis in Forest Management

Part of the book series: Managing Forest Ecosystems ((MAFE,volume 2))

Abstract

A forest enterprise manager runs risks, when deciding about harvesting strategies. The postponement of the harvest of a stand may yield, with a specifreprohability, a higher profit. However, as a consequence of storm damage, financial losses may occur. The risk of storm damage varies between different stands, similar to the price risk between shares. In this study, the problem of stand selection for final cuts is compared with the problem of optimising a portfolio. Investors that consider only the expected net present value in their investment selection are regarded as risk neutral. Empirical studies show that investors who also consider the range of the profit dispersion are usually risk averse. As a subjective decision criterion from the field of portfolio selection, the tern “expected utility” is used. The expected utility results from reduction of the expected value subject to the level of risk (variance) and the risk aversion of the decision maker. When the decision involves more investments, the risk correlation between the different investments is also taken into account. By means of examples, the use of this decision criterion in forest management is shown. One example concerns the selection of harvesting strategies. Considering a number of equally mature stands, a forest manager has to decide which stands to cut either today, or 20 or 40 years later. Waiting yields a higher profit, if no storm damage occurs. In case of a damage, the income is less than the present.stumpage value. In the second example, different probabilities of storm damage are allowed for the stands. The optimal harvesting strategy can be selected using a non-linear optimisation method. Although currently suitable decision support models from the field of Operation Research exist, formal and conscious risk management has not been implemented in German forestry. Finally, the obstacles for the implementation of improved planning tools in forest management are discussed and the future prospects of their application are assessed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bloech, J., 1974: Lineare Optimierung für Wirtschaftswissenschaftler. Studienbücher BWL/ VWL Band 2. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blohm, H.; Lüder, K., 1991: Investition, 7. Auflage, Vahlen, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortz, J., 1993: Statistik fir Sozialwissenschaftler. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieter, M., 1997: Berücksichtigung von Risiko bei forstbetrieblichen Entscheidungen. Schriften zur Forstökonomie, Band 16, Sauerländer’s Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieter, M., 1999: Betriebswirtschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Voranbau in Fichtenaltbeständen. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt ( 118. Jg. ), S. 145–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadow, Kv., 2000: Evaluating Risk in Forest Planning Models. Silva Fennica 34 (2), (in print)

    Google Scholar 

  • König, A., 1995: Sturmgefährdung von Beständen im Altersklassen Wald. Ein Erklärungs-und Prognosemodell. Frankfurt/Main: J.D. Sauerländer’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • König, A., 1996: Unveröffentlichter Abschlußbericht des Projektes: Abgrenzung von Stunnschadensrisikoklassen und Entwicklung von risikoorientierten Endnutzungsstrategien für den bayerischen Staatswald. Bayerische Landesanstalt für Wald und Forstwirtschaft, Freising.

    Google Scholar 

  • König, A., Mößmer, R., Bäumler, A., 1995: Waldbauliche Dokumentation der flächigen Sturmschäden des Frühjahres 1990 in Bayern und meteorologische Situation zur Schadenszeit. Berichte aus der Landesanstalt fir Wald und Forstwirtschaft, Freising, Band 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruschwitz, L., 1995: Investitionsrechnung. de Gnnvter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mähring, B., 1986: Dynamische Betriebsklassensimutation. Berichte des Forschungszzentmms Waldökosysteme-Waldsterben, Band 20, Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, J., 1996: Sturmschäden in Fichtenbestiindcn. In: Allgemeine Forst-und Jagdzeitung (167. Jg.), Heft 12, S. 234–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, J., 1998: Überschätzter HD-Wert? In: AFZ/Der Wald, Heft 15, S. 791–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spremann, K, 1991: Investition und Finanzierung. München, Wien: Oldenbourg Verlag.Waldherr, M., 1997: Das Schadholzrisiko im Staatswald der Forstdirektion Niederbayern-Oberpfalz während der vergangenen 40 Jahre. In: Forst und Holz (52. Jg.), Nr. 2, S. 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannover: M. H. Schaper. Zimmermann, H. J., 1992: Methoden und Modelle des Operations Research. Braunschweig, Wiesbaden: Friedrich Vieweg Sohn.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dieter, M., Moog, M., Borchert, H. (2001). Considering Serious Hazards in Forest Management Decision-Making. In: von Gadow, K. (eds) Risk Analysis in Forest Management. Managing Forest Ecosystems, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2905-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2905-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5683-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2905-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics