Skip to main content

Bacterial and Fungal Cell-Wall Hydrolytic Enzymes in Relation to Biological Control of Rhizoctonia Solani

  • Chapter
Rhizoctonia Species: Taxonomy, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Pathology and Disease Control
  • 1257 Accesses

Abstract

Cell-wall-degrading enzymes are produced by fungal parasites. Parasitism of Rhizoctonia solani was first reported by Weindling (1932), who observed the parasitic nature of Trichoderma lignorum on several plant pathogens. Weindling’s (1932) report on the possible use of mycoparasites for the control of plant pathogens raised a great deal of interest in this area of research, including the role of hydrolytic enzymes in microbial interactions. It prompted reviews and discussions of the subject in numerous articles (Barnett, 1963; Boosalis, 1964; Barnett and Binder, 1973; Ayers and Adams, 1981; Wells, 1981; Baker, 1988; Ghaffar, 1988; Elad & Chet, 1995; see also chapter VI.B5). One of the features required for successful degradation of host fungi is the ability to produce the enzymes which degrade the polymers underlying the cell wall and membranes of the host. Boosalis (1956) estimated the frequency of R. solani parasitism by Penicillium vermiculatum in soil by observing the parasitism of R. solani hyphae in situ. Indeed, living fungal structures are often parasitized in natural soils (Boosalis, 1956; Hunter et al., 1977; Sneh et al., 1977). For this purpose, it may be assumed that the parasites produce the hydrolytic enzymes in natural niches where the pathogen is present. However, even with increasing evidence of natural mycoparasitism, the ecological significance of this phenomenon, at least in soil, is still ambiguous. Griffin (1972) maintained that mycoparasitism is of no ecological significance in soil, while others have suggested that mycoparasitism has considerable impact on soil fungal populations, by reducing the longevity of survival structures (Sneh et al., 1977). In any case, one of the features required for successful degradation of host fungi is the ability to produce enzymes which degrade the polymers underlying the cell wall and membranes of the host. The studies related to these enzymes, as related to degradation of R. solani, will be described in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander M (1982) Introduction to Soil Microbiology, Wiley, New York, 467 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardgues M, Daveet P and Route C (1984) Comparison des aptitudes parasitaires de clones de Trichoderma vis-a-vis de quelques champignons a sclerotes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 16: 413–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayers WA and Adams PB (1981) Mycoparasitism and its application to biological control of plant diseases. In: Papavizas GC (ed.) Biological Control in Crop Production (pp 91–103 ) Allanheld, Osmun and Co., Totowa, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker R (1988) Mycoparasitism: Ecology and physiology. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 9: 370–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett HL (1963) The nature of mycoparasitism by fungi. Annual Review of Microbiology 17: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett HL and Binder FL (1973) The fungal host-parasite relationship. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 11: 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benhamou N and Chet I (1993) Hyphal interactions between Trichoderma harzianum and Rhizoctonia solani - ultrastructure and gold cytochemistry of the mycoparasitic process. Phytopathology 83: 10621071.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boosalis MG (1956) Effect of soil temperature and green-mature amendment of unsterilized soil on parasitism of Rhizoctonia solani by Penicillium vermiculatum and Trichoderma sp. Phytopathology 46: 473–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boosalis MG (1964) Hyperparasitism. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2: 363–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock S, Adams PB, Wiliets HJ and Ayers WA (1986) Production of haustoria by Sporidesmium sclerotivorum in sclerotia of Sclerotinia minor. Phytopathology 76: 101–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carling DE, Brown MF and Millikan DE (1976) Ultrastructural examination of the Puccinia graminis -Darluca,llum host-parasite relationship. Phytopathology 66: 419–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chemin L, Ismailov Z, Haran S and Chet I (1995) Chitinolytic Enterobacter agglomerans antagonistic to fungal plant pathogens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61: 1720–1726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chet I and Baker R (1981) Isolation and biocontrol potential of Trichoderma hamatum from soil naturally suppressive of Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology 71: 286–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chet I, Hadar Y, Elad Y, Katan J and Henis Y (1979) Biological control of soil-borne plant pathogens by Trichoderma harzianum. In: Schippers B and Gams W (eds.) Soil-Borne Plant Pathogens. (pp 585–592 ) Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chet I, Harman GE and Baker R (1981) Trichoderma hamatum: its hyphal interactions with Rhizoctonia solani and Pythium spp. Microbial Ecol. 7: 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chits SC and Tzean SS (1995) Glucanolytic enzyme production by Schizophyllum commune Fr. during mycoparasitism. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 46: 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook RJ and Baker KF (1983) The Nature and Practice of Biological Control of Plant Pathogens (539 pp), APS Press, St. Paul, Minnesota

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon JW and Henry CM (1978) Mycoparasitism by Pythium oligandrum and P. acanthicum. Soil Biol. Biochem. 10: 409–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Pietro A, Lorito M, Hayers CK, Broadway RM and Harman GE (1993) Endochitinase from Gliocladium virens: Isolation, characterization, and synergistic antifungal activity in combination with gliotoxin. Phytopathology 73: 308–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elad Y, Barak R, Chet I and Henis Y (1983a) Ultrastructural studies of the interaction between Trichoderma spp. and plant pathogenic fungi. J. Phytopathol. 107: 168–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elad Y and Chet I (1995) Mycoparasitism. In: Kohmoto K, Singh US and Singh RP (eds.) Pathogenesis and Host Specificity in Plant Diseases: Histopathological, Biochemical, Genetic and Molecular Basis. Volume II: Eukaryotes (pp 289–307 ), Pergamon, Elsevier Science Ltd. Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elad Y, Chet I and Henis Y (1982) Degradation of plant pathogenic fungi by Trichoderma harzianum. Can. J. Microbiol. 28: 719–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elad Y, Chet I, Boyle P and Henis Y (1983b) Parasitism of Trichoderma spp. on Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotium ro fsii, Scanning electron microscopy and fluorescence microscopy. Phytopathology 73: 8588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elad Y, Lifshitz R and Baker R (1985) Enzymatic activity of the mycoparasite Pythium nunn during interaction with host and non-host fungi. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 27: 131–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geremia RA, Goldman GH, Jacobs D, Montagu MV and Herrera-Estrella A (1992) Hydrolytic extracellular enzymes of Trichoderma harzianum: Specific induction of a basic proteinase. In: Jensen DF, Hockenhull J and Fokkema NJ (eds.) New Approaches in Biological Control of Soil-Borne Diseases. Bulletin WPRS 15: 193–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghaffar A (1988) Biological control of Sclerotinia diseases. In: Mukerji KG and Garg KL (eds.) Biocontrol of Plant Diseases, Vol. I (pp 153–175 ) CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin DM (1972) Ecology of Soil Fungi, Chapman and Hall, London, 193 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadar Y, Chet I and Henis Y (1979) Biological control of Rhizoctonia solani damping-off with wheat bean culture of Trichoderma harzianum. Phytopathology 69: 64–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haran S, Schickler H, Oppenheim A and Chet I (1995) New components of the chitinolytic system of Trichoderma harzianum. Mycol. Res. 99: 441–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman GE, Chet I and Baker R (1980) Trichoderma hamatum effects on seed and seedling disease induced in radish and pea by Pythium spp. or Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology 70: 1167–1172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter WE, Duniway JM and Butler EE (1977) Influence of nutrition, temperature, moisture, and gas composition on parasitism of Rhizopus oryzae by Syncephalis californica. Phytopathology 67: 664–669.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Inbar J and Chet I (1991) Evidence that chitinase produced by Aeromonas caviae is involved in the biological control of soil-borne plant pathogens by this bacterium. Soil Biol. Biochem. 23: 973–978.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jach G, Gorunhardt B, Longemann J, Pinsdorf E, Mondi J, Schell J and Maas, C (1996) Enahnced quantitative resistance agaist fungal diseases by combinatorial expression of different barley antifungal proteins in transgenic plants. Plant J. (In Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones D, Gordon AH and Bacon JSD (1974) Co-operative action by endo-and exo-(1->3)-glucanases from parasitic fungi in the degradation of cell-wall glucans of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum ( Lib.) de Bary. Biochem. J. 140: 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kritzman G, Chet I, Henis Y and Huttermann A (1978) The use of the brightener “Calcofluor White M2R New” in the study of fungal growth. Isr. J. Bot. 27: 138–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis K, Whipps JM and Cooke RC (1989) Mechanisms of biological disease control with special reference to the case study of Pythium oligandrum as an antagonist. In: Whipps JM and Lumsden RD (eds.) Biotechnology of Fungi for Improving Plant Growth (pp 191–217 ) Cambridge University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papavizas GC (1985) Trichoderma and Gliocladium: biology, ecology, and potential for biocontrol. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 23:23–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridout CJ, Coley-Smith JR and Lynch JM (1988) Fractionation of extracellular enzymes from a mycoparasitic strain of Trichoderma harzianum. Enz. Microbiol. Technol. 10: 180–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roby D, Broglie K, Cressman R, Biddle P, Chet I and Broglie R (1990) Activation of a bean chitinase promoter in transgenic tobacco plants by phytopathogenic fungi. Plant Cell 2: 999–1008.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapira R, Ordentlich A, Chet I and Oppenheim AB (1989) Control of plant diseases by chitinase expressed from cloned DNA in Escherichia coli. Phytopathology 79: 1246–1249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sneh B, Humble SJ and Lockwood LJ (1977) Parasitism of oospores of Phytopthora megasperma var. sojae, P. cactorum, Pythium sp., and Aphanomyces euteiches in soil by oomycetes, chytridiomycetes, hyphomycetes, actinomycetes, and bacteria. Phytopathology 67: 622–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tronsmo A (1986) Use of Trichoderma spp. in biological control of necrotrophic pathogens. In: Fokkema N and van den Heuvel J (eds.) Microbiology of the Phyllosphere (pp 348–361 ) Cambridge University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweddell RJ, Jabajihare SH and Charest PM (1994) Production of chitinases and (3–1,3-glucanases by Stachybotrys elegans, a mycoparasite of Rhizoctonia solani. Appt Environ. Microbiol. 60: 489–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vantilburg AUB and Thomas MD (1993) Production of extracellular proteins by the biocontrol fungus Gliocladium virens. Appi. Environ. Microbiol. 59: 236–242.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weindling R (1932) Trichoderma lignorum as a parasite of other soil fungi. Phytopathology 22:837–845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells HD (1988) Trichoderma as a biocontrol agent. In: Mukerji KG and Garg KL (eds.) Biocontrol of Plant Diseases, Vol. I (pp 71–82 ) CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeinet K, Nahid H and Fadida F (1993) Extracellular chitinase from Streptomyces sp. and its antifungal activities. Acta Pharm. Technol 35: 135–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Maher EA, Masoud S, Dixon RA and Lamb CJ (1994) Enahnced protection against fungal attack by constitutive co-expression of chitinase and glucanase genes in transgenic tobacco. Bio/Technology 12: 807–811.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Elad, Y. (1996). Bacterial and Fungal Cell-Wall Hydrolytic Enzymes in Relation to Biological Control of Rhizoctonia Solani . In: Sneh, B., Jabaji-Hare, S., Neate, S., Dijst, G. (eds) Rhizoctonia Species: Taxonomy, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Pathology and Disease Control. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2901-7_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2901-7_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4597-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2901-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics