Advertisement

Ecological aspects of life history in some net-spinning Trichoptera

  • A. G. Hildrew
Conference paper

Abstract

Theoretical ecologists have shown that species coexisting stably in the same community may not share the same limiting factors (LEVIN, 1970). The minimum distinction which must occur between two resource-limited species involves differences along niche dimensions (HUTCHINSON, 1957) which determine their use of those resources. The observation of ecological differences in a guild (ROOT 1967) of species is often taken to infer that by such differences competition is avoided and that they serve to divide up a limiting resource. WILLIAMSON (1972) has clearly indicated the weakness of this approach; differences between coexisting species are not necessarily associated with the avoidance of competition now or in the past, nor with limiting resources, though they can indicate situations worthy of further investigation.

Keywords

Life History Tributary Stream Proportional Representation Downstream Station Queen Mary College 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BENKE, A.C. 1970. A method for comparing individual growth rates of aquatic insects with special reference to the Odonata. Ecology 51: 328–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BOON, P.J. & SHIRES, S.W. 1976. Temperature studies on a river system in northeast England. Freshwat. Biol. 6: 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. CUMMINS, K.W. 1964. Factors limiting the distribution of the caddis flies Pycnopsyche lepida (HAGEN) and Pycnopsyche guttifer (WALKER) in a Michigan stream (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae). Ecol. Monogr. 34: 271–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. EDINGTON, J.M. 1968. Habitat preferences in net-spinning caddis larvae with special reference to the influence of water velocity. J. Anim. Ecol. 37: 675–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. HILDREW, A.G. 1973. Experimental observations relating to the distribution of net-spinning Trichoptera in streams. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 18: 1549–1558.Google Scholar
  6. ELLIOTT, J.M. 1968. The life histories and drifting of Trichoptera in a Dartmoor stream. J. Anim. Ecol. 37: 615–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. GLASS, L.W. & BOVBJERG, R.V. 1969. Density and dispersion in laboratory populations of caddisfly larvae (Cheumatopsyche, Hydropsychidae). Ecology 50: 1082–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. HILDREW, A.G. & MORGAN, J.C. 1974. The taxonomy of the British Hydropsychidae (Trichoptera). J. Ent. (B) 43: 217–229.Google Scholar
  9. HUTCHINSON, G.E. 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 22: 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. HUTCHINSON, G.E. 1961. The paradox of the plankton. Am. Nat. 95: 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. HYNES, H.B.N. 1961. The invertebrate fauna of a Welsh mountain stream. Arch. Hydrobiol. 57: 344–388.Google Scholar
  12. HYNES, H.B.N. 1970. The ecology of running waters. Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
  13. JOHNSTONE, G.W. 1964. Stridulation by larval Hydropsychidae. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 39: 146–150.Google Scholar
  14. KOWNACKA, M. 1971. The bottom fauna of the stream Sucha Woda (High Tatra Mts.) in the annual cycle. Acta hydrobiol. Krakow 13: 415–438.Google Scholar
  15. LEVIN, S.A. 1970. Community equilibria and stability, and an extension of the competitive exclusion principle. Am. Nat. 104: 413–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. MACDONALD, R.A. 1976. Distribution and life history of Hydropsyche species, in the River North Tyne, Northumberland. Unpublished honours project, Queen Mary College, London.Google Scholar
  17. MARINKOVIC-GOSPODNETIC, M. 1961. The dynamics of populations of Hydropsyche fuluipes CURTIS and Hydropsyche saxonica McLACHLAN (Trichoptera), Godisnjak biol. Inst. Saraj. 14: 15–84.Google Scholar
  18. OSWOOD, M.W. 1976. Comparative life histories of the Hydropsychidae (Trichoptera) in a mountain lake outlet. Am. Midl. Nat. 96: 493–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. PHILIPSON, G.N. 1969. Some factors affecting the net-spinning of the caddis fly Hydropsyche instabilis CURTIS (Trichoptera, Hydropsychidae) Hydrobiologia 34: 369–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ROOT, R.B. 1967. The niche exploitation pattern of the blue-gray gnatcatcher. Ecol. Monogr. 37: 317–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. SPRULES, W.M. 1967. An ecological investigation of stream insects in Algonquin Park, Ontario. Univ. Toronto Stud. biol. 56: 1–81.Google Scholar
  22. TANAKA, H. 1968. The aggregation of net-spinning caddisworms in the drainage ditch of fish-farm ponds. Bull. Freshwat. Fish. Res. Lab., Tokyo 18: 71–79.Google Scholar
  23. WALLACE, J.B. 1975. Food partitioning in net-spinning Trichoptera larvae: Hydropsyche uenularis, Cheumatopsyche etrona, and Macronema zebratum (Hydropsychidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 68: 463–472.Google Scholar
  24. WEBSTER, J.R. & WOODALL, W.R. 1977. The role of filter feeders in flowing waters. Arch. Hydrobiol. 74: 506–532.Google Scholar
  25. WILLIAMS, N.E. & HYNES, H.B.N. 1973. Microdistribution and feeding of the net-spinning caddisflies (Trichoptera) of a Canadian stream. Oikos 24: 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. WILLIAMSON, M. 1972. The analysis of biological populations. London. Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. G. Hildrew

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations