Abstract
There is little doubt that the more appreciative, and thus better rewarded, partners in the controversial “marriage” of the history and philosophy of science are the philosophers. At one recent meeting that I was privileged to attend, a meeting expressly designed to recognize, if not to celebrate, that “marriage,” one historian’s recognition of the raison d’être of the meeting took the form of asking for divorce. And that is not merely a sometime thing. For several years ago, Michael Crowe canvassed American historians of science concerning their annual meetings and the result was that that group with whom they would least like to meet was the philosophers of science! That surely is very far from a state devoutly to be wished. What is to be done? Frankly, I do not know. But I believe I do know at least a part of what is to be, or might be, said.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1980 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Murdoch, J.E. (1980). Utility Versus Truth. In: Hintikka, J., Gruender, D., Agazzi, E. (eds) Probabilistic Thinking, Thermodynamics and the Interaction of the History and Philosophy of Science. Synthese Library, vol 146. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2766-2_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2766-2_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8361-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2766-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive