Advertisement

The 1983 Akita-Oki Earthquake (MW = 7.8) and Its Implications for Systematics of Subduction Earthquakes

Chapter

Abstract

The source parameters of the May 26, 1983, earthquake off the coast of Akita prefecture (02h59m59.6sUT, 40.462°N, 139.102°E, 24 km, m b = 6.8, M S = 7.7) determined from long-period surface waves are:
  • 1st nodal plane; dip = 30° (E21°S), slip angle = 115°;

  • 2nd nodal plane; dip = 63° (W7°S), slip angle = 76°;

  • Seismic moment = 5.9 × 1027 dyne cm (M W = 7.8).

This mechanism is consistent with a plate model, recently suggested by several investigators, that places the boundary between the Eurasian and North American plates along the Japan Sea Coast of Honshu Island, Japan. Within the framework of this model, Honshu, Hokkaido and Sakhalin reside on the North American plate, and the Akita-Oki event represents subduction of the Eurasian plate beneath the North American Plate. The convergence rate V between the North American and Eurasia plates is 1.1 cm/year along the Japan Sea Coast of Honshu and the age T of the plate being subducted is estimated to be about 20 M years. For these values of V and T, a previously determined empirical relation between earthquake magnitude, convergence rate and plate age for large earthquakes at subduction zones predicts a magnitude (M W) of 8.0 which agrees very well with that of the Akita-Oki earthquake. This good agreement between the observed and predicted values of M W suggests that the empirical relation is valid for subduction zones with very small T and V such as the Juan de Fuca subduction zone, Pacific Northwest, for which V = 3 to 4 cm/year, T = 10 to 15 M years and M W = 8.4 has been estimated.

There is some indication that interplate slip at subduction zones with a very young (T < 20 M years) subducting plate has a significant amount of aseismic component, which increases the repeat time.

Keywords

Subduction Zone Large Earthquake Rayleigh Wave Seismic Moment Empirical Relation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abe, K., Reliable estimation of the seismic moment of large earthquakes, J. Phys. Earth., 23, 381–390, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ando, M., Source mechanisms and tectonic significance of historical earthquakes along the Nankai Trough, Japan, Tectonophysics, 27, 119–140, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Astiz, L. and H. Kanamori, An earthquake doublet in Ometepec, Guerrero, Mexico, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 34, 24–45, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dziewonski, A. M., J. E. Franzen, and J. H. Woodhouse, Centroid-moment tensor solutions for April-June, 1983, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 33, 243–249, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fukao, Y. and M. Furumoto,,Mechanism of large earthquakes along the eastern margin of the Japan Sea, Tectonophysics, 25,, 247–266, 1975.Google Scholar
  6. Given, J. W. and H. Kanamori, The depth extent of the 1977 Sumbawa Indonesia earthquake, abstract, Eos, 61, 1044, 1980.Google Scholar
  7. Heaton, T. H. and H. Kanamori, Seismic potential associated with subduction in the Northwestern United States, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am., 74, 933–941, 1984.Google Scholar
  8. Imamura, A., On the seismic activity of central Japan, Japanese J. Astron. Geophys., 6, 119–137, 1928.Google Scholar
  9. Ishikawa, Y., M. Takeo, M. Katsumata, M. Takahashi, S. Kashiwabara, and N. Mikami, The focal process of the 1983 Nihonkai-Chubu earthquake, Abstract, Seismol. Soc. Japan, 1983, No. 2, 19, 1983 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  10. Kanamori, H., Seismological evidence for a lithospheric normal faulting-the Sanriku earthquake of 1933, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 4, 289–300, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kanamori, H., The energy release in great earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res., 82, 2981–2987, 1977a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kanamori, H., Seismic and aseismic slip along subduction zones and their tectonic implications, in Isl.,. d Arcs, Deep Sea Trenches and Back-Arc Basins, edited by M. Talwani and W. C. Pittman, pp. 163–174, Maurice Ewing Series, American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., 1977b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kanamori, H., Global seismicity, in Earthquakes: Observation, Theory and Interpretation, edited by H. Kanamori and E. Boschi, pp. 596–608, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983.Google Scholar
  14. Kanamori, H. and J. W. Given, Use of long-period surface waves for rapid determination of earthquake-source parameters, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 27, 8–31, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Knamori, H. and K. C. Mcnally, Variable rupture mode of the subduction zone along the Ecuador-Colombia Coast, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am., 72, 1241–1253, 1982.Google Scholar
  16. Kobayashi, Y., Beginning of plate subduction, The Earth Monthly, 3, 510–518, 1983 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  17. Lay, T., H. Kanamori, and L. Ruff, The asperity model and the nature of large subduction zone earhquakes, Earthq. Predict. Res., 1, 3–71, 1982.Google Scholar
  18. Minster, J. B. and T. H. Jordan, Present-day plate motions, J. Geophys. Res., 83, 5331–5354, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nakamura, K., Possible nascent trench along the eastern Japan Sea as the convergent boundary between Eurasian and North American plates, Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst., Univ. Tokyo, 58, 711–722, 1983 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  20. Otofuji, Y. and T. Matsuda, Paleomagnetic evidence for the clockwise rotation of Southwest Japan, Earth and Planet. Sci. Lett., 62, 349–359, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Otofuji, Y., T. Matsuda, K. Nagao, and S. Nohda, Paleomagnetism of tertiary tuff, in the Tohoku district, Japan, abstract of the paper presented at the annual meeting of Ate Japanese Society for Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity, May 1984, Iii - 42, 1984 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  22. Peterson, E. T. and T. Seno, Factors affecting seismic moment release rates in subduction zones, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 10,233–10, 248, 1984.Google Scholar
  23. Ruff, L. and H. Kanamori, Seismicity and the subduction process, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 23, 240–252, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. SA Fake, K., The mechanism of the 1983 Japan Sea earthquake as inferred from long-period surface waves and tsunamis, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 37, 249–260, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Satake, K., K. Abe, S. Yamaki, Y. Ishikawa, and M. Takeo, The source process of the 1983 Nihonkai-Chubu earthquake, Abstract, Seismol. Soc. Japan, 1983, No. 2, 17, 1983 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  26. Sato, T., M. Kosuge, K. Tanaka, and H. Sato, Aftershock distribution of the Nihonkai-Chubu earthquake, Abstract, Seismol. Soc. Japan, 1984, No. 1, 37, 1984 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  27. Seno, T., Is Northern Japan a part of the North American plate?, The Earth, Monthly, 6, 49–54, 1984.Google Scholar
  28. Seno, T. and T. Eguchi, Seismotectonics of the Western Pacific, in Geodynamics of the Western Pacific Indonesian Region, edited by T. W. C. Hilde and S. Uyeda, pp. 5–46, Geodynamic Ser., 11, Am. Geophys. Union and Geological Soc. Am., 1983.Google Scholar
  29. Shimazaki, K. and J. Mori, Focal mechanism of the May 26, 1983, Japan Sea earthquake, Abstract, Seismol. Soc. Japan, 1983, No. 2, 15, 1983.Google Scholar
  30. Shimazaki, K. and T. Nakata, Time-predictable recurrence model for large earthquakes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 7, 229–282, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stewart, G., Implications for plate tectonics of the August 19, 1977, Indonesia decoupling normal fault earthquake, abstract, Eos, 59, 326, 1978.Google Scholar
  32. Suyehiro, K., A. Nishizawa, T. Urabe, N. Kanazawa, T. Hirata, H. Shimamura, and T. Iwasaki, Aftershock distribution of the 1983 Nihonkai-Chubu earthquake during the observation period of Obs, Abstract, Seismol. Soc. Japan, 1984, No. 1, 40, 1984.Google Scholar
  33. Sykes, L. R. and R. C. Quittmeyer, Repeat times of great earthquakes along simple plate boundaries, in Earthquake Prediction-An International Review, edited by D. W. Simpson and P. G. Richards, pp. 217–247, Maurice Ewing Series; 4, American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., 1981.Google Scholar
  34. Tara, T., Nihonkai-Chubu earthquake and crustal deformation, The Earth Monthly, 6, 18–21, 1984.Google Scholar
  35. Takahashi, M., N. Nishide, A. Fukutome, M. Komiya, K. Sato, Y. Kanbayashi, K. Sakuma, H. Yokoyama, and K. Yoshikawa, Summary of the 1983 Nihonkai-Chubu earthquake, Abstract, Seismol. Soc. Japan, 1983, No. 2, 1, 1983 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  36. Tamaki, K., Structure and tectonics of the eastern border of the Japan Sea, The Earth Monthly, 6, 38–48, 1984 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  37. Tohoku University and Hirosaki University, Seismicity associated with the 1983 Nihonkai-Chubu earthquake, Abstract, Seismol. Soc. Japan, 1983, No. 2, 3, 1983 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  38. Umino, N., T. Matsuzawa, K. Obara, H. Shimizu, A. Hasegawa, A. Takagi, M. Kosuge, K. Tanaka, T. Sato, and H. Sato, Distribution of aftershocks of the 1983 Nihonkai-Chubu earthquake, Seismol. Soc. Japan, 1983, No. 2, 4, 1983 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  39. Usami, T., Descriptive Catalogue of Disast. Earthquakes in Japan, 327 pp., Univ. of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, 1975 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  40. Uyeda, S. and H. Kanamori, Back-arc opening and the mode of subduction, J. Geophys. Res., 84, 1049–1061, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Seismological LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA

Personalised recommendations