Abstract
The subject of interdisciplinarity concerns the philosophy and the history of science in a twofold way: on the one hand the emergence, the development, and the mutual relationships between disciplines are, of course, one of the central subjects of research in the history of science; on the other hand philosophy and history of science are fields that are themselves of an interdisciplinary nature. In fact, these two aspects are also closely related to each other, as viewing philosophy and history of science as forerunners of an emerging interdisciplinary field may also serve to emphasize the as yet immature character of our understanding of the phenomenon of interdisciplinarity. A Festschrift dedicated to Robert S. Cohen and his interests in the inseparable bonds between the philosophy and history of science provides a natural occasion to deal with both of these aspects: part one of the following essay therefore discusses some features of the development of historical epistemology as an interdisciplinary field, while part two addresses the new technological conditions under which this development takes place today, including some sidelights on the impact of these conditions on the future of interdisciplinary research in general.2
The basic ideology of science is mastery of nature, a basic component of modern society. But that mastery must be mastered, by philosophy and politics, which is to say, by insight, activity and change.
Robert S. Cohen1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cohen, Robert S. “Constraints on Science,” in A Portrait of Twenty-five Years. Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science 1960–1985, ed. Robert S. Cohen and Marx W. Wartofsky. 198–205. Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1985.
Crane, Gregory. “Composing Culture. The Authoring of an Electronic Text,” Current Anthropology 32 (3) (1991).
Damerow, Peter, Freudenthal, Gideon, McLaughlin, Peter, and Renn, Jürgen. Exploring the Limits of Preclassical Mechanics, New York: Springer Verlag, 1991.
Lefèvre, Wolfgang. Die Entstehung der biologischen Evolutionstheorie, Frankfurt/M, Berlin, Wien: Ullstein, 1984.
Renn, Jürgen, Damerow, Peter, and Galluzzi, Paolo. The Galileo Einstein Electronic Archives Project, NSF Grant Proposal, 1992.
Stichweh, Rudolf. Zur Entstehung des modernen Systems wissenschaftlicher Disziplinen. Physik in Deutschland 1740–1890, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1984.
Wartofsky, Marx W. “Perception, Representation, and the Forms of Action: Towards an Historical Epistemology,” in A Portrait of Twenty-five Years, Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science 1960–1985, ed. Robert S. Cohen and Marx W. Wartofsky. 215–237. Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1985.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Renn, J. (1995). Historical Epistemology and Interdisciplinarity. In: Gavroglu, K., Stachel, J., Wartofsky, M.W. (eds) Physics, Philosophy, and the Scientific Community. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 163. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2658-0_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2658-0_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4436-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2658-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive