Mimesis, Law and Medicine
Modern medicine finds expression in the clinical act and is strongly determined by an image. Clinical activity and reference to the image of the body have belonged together since the origins of medicine. Medicine created images of the body, of body parts, of organs, of functional dependencies between those parts. That is the substance of connections between the drawings of Da Vinci or Descartes and the recent mapping in genetics or the neurosciences. Techniques of (re)presentation and their results are part of our age, with its television, its comics, its audio-visual representations. The clinical picture as a picture is related to such culturally determined forms of knowledge.
KeywordsMedical Knowledge Medical Case Medical Discourse Epistemological Virtue Brute Fact
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.M. Herberger, Dogmatik, Zur Geschichte von Begriff und Methode in Medizin und Jurisprudenz (Frankfurt/Main, 1981 ).Google Scholar
- 2.A. Artaud, HÉLIOGABALE ou l’Anarchiste Couronné (Paris, 1934); (Paris, 1979 [2)], pp. 72ff.Google Scholar
- 3.G. Deleuze and F. Guattari, L’Anti-OEdipe. Capitalisme et schizophrénie (Paris, 1972), pp. 29ff, p. 9.; Mille Plateaux (Paris, 1980), pp. 95ff.; Cl. Reichler (ed.), Le Corps et ses fictions (Paris, 1983 ).Google Scholar
- 4.R. Barthes, “Sémiologie et médecine,” in R. Bastide (ed.), Les Sciences de la folie (Dordrecht, 1972). Reprint in: R. Barthes, L’Aventure sémiologique (Paris, 1985 ), pp. 273–283.Google Scholar
- 8.L. Fleck, “Erfahrung und Tatsache,” in L. Schäfer and Th. Schnelle (eds.), Gesammelte Aufsätze (Frankfurt/M., 1983). pp. 37ff, 128ff.Google Scholar