Skip to main content

The Confucian Relation Concept of the Person and Its Modern Predicament

  • Chapter
Personhood and Health Care

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 7))

Abstract

It is a notable phenomenon in recent East-West comparative philosophy that Confucian communitarianism is proposed as an alternative to Western liberal individualism in a forward- rather than backward-looking spirit.2 What proponents of Confucianism often single out as particularly worthy of endorsement in an age chastened by antifoundationalism and historicism is the Confucian relational concept of the person. They claim that this concept is both epistemically more cogent and ethically more attractive than the liberal individualistic concept of the person. They see in this concept no just a better alternative regarding specific problems but a superior framework for dealing with a whole range of social and ethical issues, from the environment to human rights to bioethics, in which liberal individualism is often handicapped by its epistemic and moral biases.

Reprinted with permission: 1999 Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (4), 325-346.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ames, R.T. (1988) Rites as Rights: The Confucian Alternative, in Rouner, L.S. (ed.) Human Rights and the World’s Religions, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, 199–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, W.T. (1963) A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, Z. (1989) Chungiufanlu, Shanghai guji Chubanshe, Shanghai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, E., et al. (1994) Zhongguo zongzu shehui, Jejiang renmin chubanshe, Hangzhou.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1990) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, trans. C. Lenhardt and S. Weber Nicholsen, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1995) Reconciliation through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawl’s Political Liberalism, Journal of Philosophy 92, 109–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D.L. and Ames, R.T. (1987) Thinking Through Confucius, State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, C. (1985) Individualism in Chinese Thought, in Munro, D. (ed.) Individualism and Holism: Studies in Confucian and Taoist Values, Center for Chinese Studies, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui E.C. (1998) Jen and Perichoresis: The Confucian and Christian Bases of the Relational Person, in Becker, G.K. (ed.) The Moral Status of Persons: Perspectives on Bioethics, Rodopi, Amsterdam, Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Q. (1989) Zhongguo dalu fuzing ruxue de xianshi yiyi jigi mianlin de wenti (1), Ehu yuekan 15, 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A.Y.C. (1985) The Individual and Group in Confucianism: A Relational Perspective, in Munro D. (ed.) Individualism and Holism: Studies in Confucian and Taoist Values, Center for Chinese Studies, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.S. (1994) Some Confucian Reflections on the Concept of Autonomous Individual, Journal of Chinese Philosophy 21, 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.H. (1992) Was There a Concept of Rights in Confucian Virtue-Based Morality? Journal of Chinese Philosophy 19, 241–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, S. and Sun, C. (eds) (1997) Lunli xinshidian: zhuanxing shiqi de shehui lunli yu daode, Zhongguo shehui kexue chabanshe, Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1964) The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, trans. M. Milligan, International Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosemont, H. (1991) Rights-Bearing Individuals and Role-Bearing Persons, in Bockover, M.I. (ed.) Rules, Rituals, and Responsibility: Essays Dedicated to Herbert Fingarette, Open Court, LaSalle, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruan, J. (1996) Rujia wenhua chuantong yu dangdai daode jiangou, Zhexue yanjiu 4, 38–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao, J. (1990) The Chinese Moral Ethos and the Concept of Individual Rights, Journal of Applied Philosophy 7, 119–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao, J. 1998, `Confucianism, in Chadwick R. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, Vol. 1, Academic Press, San Diego, 597–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S. (1991) Zhongxi renlun de chongtu, Zhongguo renmin daxue chubanshe, Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D. (1989) Zhongguo lunli sixiang yianjiu, Shanghai renmin chubanshe, Shanghai.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ci, J. (1999). The Confucian Relation Concept of the Person and Its Modern Predicament. In: Personhood and Health Care. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2572-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2572-9_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5858-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2572-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics