Trophic interactions in a shallow lake following a reduction in nutrient loading: a long-term study

  • Martin R. Perrow
  • Brian Moss
  • Julia Stansfield
Chapter
Part of the Developments in Hydrobiology book series (DIHY, volume 94)

Abstract

After the diversion of a nutrient-rich inflow, the eutrophic lake, Alderfen Broad, initially showed reduced total phosphorus concentrations and phytoplankton populations, clear water and the establishment of submerged macrophytes. Internal P loading then increased, perhaps stimulated by the senescence of submerged macrophytes and exacerbated by the lack of flushing. Cyanophytes appeared in the summer of two years. As a consequence of poor recruitment of roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)), the chief zooplanktivore, and a summerkill of the fish population, populations of large-bodied Cladocera (Daphnia hyalina/longispina and ultimately D. magna) developed. In the long-term, these may have limited the further development of phytoplankton populations and clear water and submerged macrophytes returned. During this latter period, internal P release has remained high (> 380 µg 1−1), thereby indicating the scope for biomanipulation even in eutrophic conditions. However, isolation of the lake has led to a decrease in water level (which through increased temperatures and lowered dissolved oxygen levels was probably responsible for the fish deaths) and further concentration of internal P load. Sediment is now being removed to reestablish greater water depth.

Keywords

Biomass Phosphorus Chlorophyll Europe Phytoplankton 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bengtsson, L., S. Fleischer, G. Lindmark and W. Ripli, 1975. Lake Trummen restoration project. 1. Water and sediment chemistry. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 19: 1080–1087.Google Scholar
  2. Benndorf, J., 1987. Food web manipulation without nutrient control: a useful strategy in lake restoration. Schweiz. Z. Hydrobiol. 49: 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benndorf, J., 1990. Conditions for effective biomanipulation; conclusions derived from whole-lake experiments in Europe. Hydrobiologia 200–201/Dev. Hydrobiol. 61: 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clasen, J., W. Rast and S.-O Ryding, 1989. Available techniques for treating eutrophication. In: S.-O Ryding and W. Rast (eds), The Control of Eutrophication of Lakes and Reservoirs. UNESCO, Man and the Biosphere Series, Vol. 1, Parthenon Publishing Group; Lancs., England: 169–212.Google Scholar
  5. Cryer, M., G. Pierson and C. R. Townsend, 1986. Reciprocal interactions between roach Rutilas rutilius, and zooplankton in a small lake: Prey dynamics and fish growth and recruitment. Limnol Oceanogr. 31: 1022–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dawidowicz, P., 1990. Effectiveness of phytoplankton control by large-bodied and small-bodied zooplankton. Hydrobiologia 200–201/Dev. Hydrobiol. 61: 43–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Nie, A. W., 1987. The decrease in aquatic vegetation in Europe and its consequences for fish populations. EIFAC Occasional Paper 19. FAO, Rome, 88 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Dillon, P. J. and F. H. Rigler, 1974. The phosphorus-chlorophyll relationship in lakes. Limnol. Oceanogr. 19: 767–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Giles, N., M. Street, R. Wright, V. Phillips and A. TraillStevenson, 1991. A review of the fish and duck research at Great Linford 1986–1990. Game Conserv. Annu. Rev. 129–133.Google Scholar
  10. Giussani, G., R. de Bernardi and T. Ruffoni, 1990. Three years of experience in biomanipulating a small eutrophic lake: Lago di Candia (Northern Italy). Hydrobiologia 200–201/ Dev. Hydrobiol. 61: 357–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gulati, R. D., E. H. R. R. Lammens, M.-L. Meijer and E. van Donk (eds), 1990. Biomanipulation - Tool for Water Management. Proceedings of an international conference held in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 8–11 August, 1989. Developments in Hydrobiology 61. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 628 pp. Reprinted from Hydrobiologia 200201.Google Scholar
  12. Horppila, J. and T. Kairesalo, 1990. A fading recovery: the role of roach (Rutilus rutilus L.) in maintaining high phytoplankton productivity and biomass in lake Vesijarvi, southern Finland. Hydrobiologia 200–201/Dev. Hydrobiol. 61: 153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hosper, S. H. and E. Jagtman, 1990. Biomanipulation additional to nutrient control for restoration of shallow lakes in The Netherlands. Hydrobiologia 200–201/Dev. Hydrobiol. 61: 523–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Irvine, K., B. Moss and H. Balls, 1989. The loss of submerged plants with eutrophication. II. Relationships between fish and zooplankton in a set of experimental ponds, and conclusions. Freshwat. Biol. 22: 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jeppesen, E., M. Sondergaard, E. Mortensen, P. Kristensen, B. Riemann, H. J. Jensen, J. P. Miller, O. Sortkjaer, J. P. Jensen, K. Christoffersen, S. Bosselmann and E. Dall, 1990. Fish manipulation as a lake restoration tool in shallow, eutrophic temperate lakes 1: cross-analysis of three Danish case-studies. Hydrobiologia 200–201/Dev. Hydrobiol. 61: 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jeppesen, E., J. P. Jensen, P. Kristensen, M. Sondergaard, E. Mortensen, O. Sortkjaer and K. Olrik, 1990. Fish manipulation as a lake restoration tool in shallow, eutrophic, temperate lakes 2: threshold levels, long-term stability and conclusions. Hydrobiologia 200–201/Dev. Hydrobiol. 61: 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Malthus, T. J., E. P. H. Best and A. G. Dekker, 1990. An assessment of the importance of emergent and floating-leaved macrophytes to trophic status in the Loosdrecht lakes (The Netherlands). Hydrobiolgia 191/Dev. Hydrobiol. 53: 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marsden, M. W., 1989. Lake restoration by reducing external phosporous loading: the influence of sediment release. Freshwat. Biol. 21: 139–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mason, C. F. and R. J. Bryant, 1975. Production, nutrient content and decomposition of Phragmites communis Trin. and Typha angustifolia L. J. Ecol. 63: 71–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mason, C. F., 1976. Broadland. In: R. Washbourn (ed.), Nature in Norfolk. Norfolk Naturalists Trust, Norwich, England, UK: 79–89.Google Scholar
  21. McQueen, D. J., J. R. Post and E. L. Mills, 1986. Trophic relationships in freshwater pelagic ecosystems. Can. J. Fish aquat. Sci. 43: 1571–1581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moss, B., 1983. The Norfolk Broadland: experiments in the restoration of a complex wetland. Biol. Rev. 58: 521–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moss, B., 1989. Water pollution and the management of ecosystems: a case study of science and scientist. In P. J. Grubb and J. H. Whittaker (eds), Towards a More Exact Ecology. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford: 401–423.Google Scholar
  24. Moss, B., 1990. Engineering and biological approaches to the restoration from eutrophication of shallow lakes in which aquatic plant communities are important components. Hydrobiologia 200–201/Dev. Hydrobiol. 61: 367–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moss, B., H. Balls and K. Irvine, 1985. Isolation of Broads as a technique for restoration. ISBN 0 948119063. Broads Authority, England, UK.Google Scholar
  26. Moss, B., H. Balls, K. Irvine and J. Stansfield, 1986. Restoration of two lowland lakes by isolation from nutrient-rich water sources with and without removal of sediment. J. appl. Ecol. 23: 391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moss, B., D. E. Forrest and G. Phillips, 1979. Eutrophication and palaeolimnology of two small mediaeval man-made lakes. Archiv. Hydrobiol. 85: 409–425.Google Scholar
  28. Moss, B., J. Stansfield and K. Irvine, 1990. Problems in the restoration of a hypertrophie lake by diversion of a nutrient-rich inflow. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 24: 568–572.Google Scholar
  29. Moss, B., J. Stansfield and K. Irvine, 1991. Development of daphnid communities in diatom-and cyanophyte-dominated lakes and their relevance to lake restoration by biomanipulation. J. appl. Ecol. 28: 586–602.Google Scholar
  30. Nichols, D. S. and D. R. Keeney, 1973. Nitrogen and phosphorous release from decaying water milfoil. Hydrobiologia 42: 509–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peirson, G., M. Cryer. I. J. Winfield and C. R. Townsend, 1985. The impact of reduced nutrient loading on the fish community of a small isolated lake, Alderfen Broad. Proceedings of the fourth British Freshwater Fisheries Conference, University of Liverpool, UK: 167–175.Google Scholar
  32. Perrow, M. R., 1989. Causes and consequences of a two year cycle in recruitment of roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)) in Alderfen Broad. PhD thesis, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.Google Scholar
  33. Perrow, M. R., 1992. Reversing the effects of eutrophication upon fish communities: Lessons from Broadland. Proc. Instit. Fish. Mgmt., Aberdeen, UK (in press).Google Scholar
  34. Perrow, M. R. and K. Irvine, 1992. The relationship between cladoceran body size and the growth of underyearling roach (Rutilus rutilus) (L.)) in two shallow lowland lakes: a mechanism for density-dependent reductions in growth. Hydro-biologia 241: 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Perrow, M. R., G. Peirson and C. R. Townsend, 1990. The dynamics of a population of roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)) in a shallow lake: is there a two-year cycle in recruitment? Hydrobiologia 191/Dev. Hydrobiol. 53: 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Persson, L., 1987. Effects of habitat and season on competitive interactions between roach (Rutilus rutilus) and perch (Percy fluviatilis). Oecologia 73: 170–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Phillips, G. L., 1977. The mineral nutrient levels in three Norfolk Broads differing in trophic status, and an annual mineral content budget for one of them. J. Ecol. 65: 447–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Phillips, G., D. F. Eminson and B. Moss, 1978. A mechanism to account for macrophyte decline in progressively eutrophicated fresh waters. Aquat. Bot. 4: 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sas, H., 1989. Lake restoration by reduction of nutrient loading: Expectations, experiences, extrapolations. Academia Verlag: 497 pp.Google Scholar
  40. Scheffer, M., 1990. Multiplicity of stable states in freshwater systems. Hydrobiologia 200–201/Dev. Hydrobiol. 61: 475–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shapiro, J., 1990. Biomanipulation: the next phase-making it stable. Hydrobiologia 200–201/Dev. Hydrobiol. 61: 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sondergaard, M., E. Jeppeson, E. Mortensen, E. Dall, P. Kristensen and O. Sortkjaer, 1990. Phytoplankton biomass reduction after planktivorous fish reduction in a shallow, eutrophic lake: a combined effect of reduced internal P-loading and increased zooplankton grazing. Hydrobiologia 200–201/Dev. Hydrobiol. 61: 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Townsend, C. R. and M. R. Perrow, 1989. Eutrophication may produce population cycles in roach. Rutilus rutilus, by two contrasting mechanisms. J. Fish. Biol. 34: 161–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Townsend, C. R., W. J. Sutherland and M. R. Perrow, 1990. A modelling investigation of population cycles in the fish Rutilus rutilus. J. anim. Ecol. 59: 469–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Van Donk, E., E. De Decuere, J. P. G. Klein Breteler and J. Meulemans, (in press). Herbivory by waterfowl and fish and macrophytes in a biomanipulated lake: effects on longterm recovery. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 25.Google Scholar
  46. Van Donk, E., M. P. Grimm, R. D. Gulati and J. P. G. Klein Breteler, 1990b. Whole-lake food-web manipulation as a means to study community intercations in a small ecosystem. Hydrobiologia 200–201/Dev. Hydrobiol. 61: 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Van Donk, E., M. P. Grimm, R. D. Gulati, P. G. M. Heuts, W. A. de Kloet and L. Van Liere, 1990a. First attempt to apply whole-lake food-web manipulation on a large scale in The Netherlands. Hydrobiologia 200–201/Dev. Hydrobiol. 61: 291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van Liere, L., R. D. Gulati, F. G. Wortelboer and E. H. R. R. Lammens, 1990. Phosphorus dynamics following restoration measures in the Loosdrecht Lakes (The Netherlands). Hydrobiologia 191/Dev. Hydrobiol. 53: 87–95.Google Scholar
  49. Willemsen, J., 1980. Fishery aspects of eutrophication. Hydrobiol. Bull. 14: 12–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Winfield, I. J., 1986. The influence of simulated aquatic macrophytes on the zooplankton consumption rate of juvenile roach, Rutilus rutilus, rudd, Scardinius erythrophthalmus, and perch, Perca fluviatilis. J. Fish. Biol. 29: 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Winfield, I. J. and C. R. Townsend, 1988. Factors affecting prey selection by young bream Abramis brama and roach Rutilus rutilus: insights provided by parallel studies in laboratory and field. Envir. Biol. Fishes, 21: 279–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wium-Anderson, S. U., U. Anthoni, C. Cristophersen and G. Houen, 1982. Allepathic effects on phytoplankton by substances isolated from aquatic macrophytes (Charales). Oikos 39: 187–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin R. Perrow
    • 1
  • Brian Moss
    • 2
  • Julia Stansfield
    • 3
  1. 1.ECON, School of Biological SciencesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichEngland
  2. 2.Dept. of Environmental & Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolEngland
  3. 3.Biology LaboratoryNational Rivers AuthorityHaddiscoe, Gt. YarmouthEngland

Personalised recommendations