Skip to main content

The application of statistics and computing in wood anatomy

  • Chapter
New Perspectives in Wood Anatomy

Part of the book series: Forestry Sciences ((FOSC,volume 1))

Summary

In published anatomical research up to the 1960 decade there has been little application of statistical method other than presentation of mean values. With the recent expansion of statistical teaching and the wider availability of computers, statistical treatment of anatomical data should increase. This paper presents a checklist of univariate and multivariate statistical techniques relevant to identifying and characterising sources and patterns of variation of anatomical features within and between trees and geographic locations. Non-statistical applications of computers are described including the curatorial management of wood collections (xylaria) and the identification of wood samples. Attention is drawn to the IAWA ‘Standard list of characters suitable for computerized hardwood identification’.

This paper is a much enlarged version of a chapter in the second edition of ‘Anatomy of the Dicotyledons’ (Metcalfe and Chalk, 1982).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, T.W. 1958. Introduction to multivariate statistical analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, I.A. & J. Burley. 1972. Variation of wood quality of Pinus merkusii Jungh. and de Vriese; five trees of Burma provenance grown in Zambia Rhod. J. Agric. Res. 10: 183–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, I.W. & H.B. Shephard. 1915. Sanio’s laws for the variation in size of coniferous tracheids. Bot. Gaz. 60: 66–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balan Menon, P.K. 1957. Microscopic key for the identification of commercial timbers. Malay Forester 20: 162–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beversluis, J.R. 1943. De micrografische identificatie van conifere houtsoorten. Meded. Landb. Hogesch. Wageningen 47 /2: 39 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, C.I. 1967. Statistics in biology. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazier, J.D. & G.L. Franklin. 1961. Identification of hardwoods. For. Prod. Res. Bull. No. 46: 96 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burley, J. 1969. Tracheid length variation in a single tree of Pinus kesiya Royle ex Gord. Wood Sci. Technol. 3: 109–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burley, J. 1970. Variation in wood properties of Pinus kesiya Royle ex Gordon (syn. P. khasya Royle; P. insularis Endlicher): eighteen trees of Burma provenance grown in Zambia. Wood Sci. Technol. 4: 255–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burley, J. & I.A. Andrew. 1970. Variation in wood properties of Pinus kesiya Royle ex Gordon (syn. P. khasya Royle; P. insularis Endlicher): six trees of Assam provenance grown in Zambia. Wood Sci. Technol. 4: 195–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burley, J. & P.M. Burrows. 1972. Multivariate analysis of provenance variation in needles of Pinus kesiya Royle ex Gordon (syn. P. khasya Royle; P. insularis Endlicher ). Silvae Genetica 21: 69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burley, J., T. Posner & P. Waters. 1970. Sampling techniques for measurement of fibre length in Eucalyptus species. Wood Sci. Technol. 4: 240–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cailliez, F. & P. Gueneau. 1972. Principal component analysis of technological properties of Malaysian timbers. Cahier Scientifique No. 2, Suppl. Bois For. Trop.: 51 pp.; and Ann. Sci. For. 29: 215–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S.H. 1938. A multiple-entry perforated-card key with special reference to the identification of hardwoods. New Phytol. 38: 369–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corothie, H. 1948. Maderas de Venezuela. Min. Agric. y Cria, Caracas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, D.F. 1979. The scanning electron microscope in recent systematic plant anatomy. In C.R. Metcalfe & L. Chalk (eds.), Anatomy of the Dicotyledons. Vol. 1 (2nd Ed.). Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dadswell, H.E. & A.M. Eckersley. 1941. The card sorting method applied to the identification of the commercial timbers of the genus Eucalyptus. J. Counc. Sci. & Ind. Res. 14: 266–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dancik, B.P. & B.V. Barnes. 1975. Leaf variability in yellow birch in relation to environment. Canad. J. For. Res. 5: 395–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. 1972. Variation, association and inheritance in Eucalyptus deglupta Blume. Ph.D. Thesis. Austr. National Univ., Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkenhagen, E.R. & N. Nash. 1978. Multivariate classification in provenance research. Silvae Genetica 27: 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freese, F. 1967. Elementary statistical methods for foresters. U.S.D.A. Agric. Handbook 317: 87 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottwald, H. 1958. Handelshölzer. Ihre Benennung, Bestimmung und Beschreibung. F. Holzmann, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower, J.C. 1975. Relating classification to identification. In: R.J. Pankhurst (ed.), Biological Identification with Computers: 251–263. Acad. Press. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graaff, N.A. van der, & P. Baas. 1974. Wood anatomical variation in relation to latitude and altitude. Blumea 22: 101–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hans, A.S. & J. Burley. 1972. Wood quality of eight Eucalyptus species in Zambia. Experientia 28: 1378–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hans, A.S., J. Burley & J.G. Williamson 1972a. Wood quality of Eucalyptus grandis ( Hill) Maiden in a fertilizer trial at Siamambo, Zambia. E. Afr. Agric. For. J. 38: 157–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hans, A.S., J. Burley & P. Williamson. 1972b. Wood quality in Eucalyptus grandis ( Hill) Maiden, grown in Zambia. Holzforschung 26: 138–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogeweg, P. & J. Koek-Noorman. 1975. Wood anatomical classification using iterative character weighing. Acta Bot. Neerl. 24: 269–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopp, H. 1941. Methods of distinguishing between ship-mast and common forms of black locust on Long Island. N.Y. USDA Techn. Bull. 742: 24 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • IAWA Committee. 1981. Standard list of characters suitable for computerized hardwood identification. IAWA Bull. n.s. 2: 99–145 (also separately: IAWA, Leiden).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffers, J.N.R. 1959. Experimental design and analysis in forest research. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffers, J.N.R. 1962. Principal components analysis of designed experiments. The Statistician 12: 230–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffers, J.N.R. 1967a. The study of variation in taxonomic research. The Statistician 17: 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffers, J.N.R. 1967b. Two case studies in the application of PCA. Appl. Stat. 16: 225–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M.G. 1975. Multivariate analysis. Charles Griffin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettenring, J.R. 1971. Canonical analysis of several sets of variables. Biometrika 58: 433–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koek-Noorman, J. & P. Hogeweg. 1974. The wood anatomy of Vanguerieae, Cinchoneae, Condamineae, and Rondeletieae (Rubiaceae). Acta Bot. Neerl. 23: 627–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kribs, D.A. 1959. Commercial foreign woods on the American market. Pennsylvania State Univ. Kukachka, B.F. 1960. Identification of coniferous woods. TAPPI 43: 887–896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariaux, A. & A. Vitalis-Brun. 1979. A tentative statistical method for wood identification in 20 genera of Sapotaceae. IAWA Bull. 1979 /2: 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mergen, F., D.T. Lester, G.M. Furnival & J. Burley. 1966. Discriminant analysis of Eucalyptus cinerea x Eucalyptus maculosa hybrids. Silvae Genetica 15: 148–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, C.R. & L. Chalk. 1950. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons. Vol. 1 & 2. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, C.R. & L. Chalk. 1979. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons. Vol. 1 ( 2nd Ed. ). Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, C.R. & L. Chalk. 1982. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons. Vol. 2 ( 2nd Ed. ). Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R.B. 1980. Wood identification via computer. IAWA Bull. n.s. 1: 154–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, L.E. 1974. Computer programs for specimen identification, key construction and description printing using taxonomic data matrices. Michigan State Univ., Publ. Mus. Biol. Ser. 5: 1–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, L.E. 1975. Recent advances in the theory and practice of biological specimen identification. In: R.J. Pankhurst (ed.), Biological Identification with Computers. Acad. Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, L.E., J.A. Peters & P.B. Hamel. 1971. A general data format for summarising taxonomic information. Bioscience 21: 174–180, 186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Normand, D. 1946. Les clefs pour l’identification des bois et le système des fiches perforées. L’Agron. Trop. 1: 162–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Normand, D. 1972. Manuel d’identification des bois commerciaux. I. Généralités. Centre Techn. For. Trop., Nogent-sur-Marne, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dever, L. van den, P. Baas & M. Zandee. 1981. Comparative wood anatomy of Symplocos and latitude and altitude of provenance. IAWA Bull. n.s. 2: 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pankhurst, R.J. 1975. Biological identification with computers. Syst. Assoc. Spec. Vol. 7. Acad. Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, R.G. & E.A. Wheeler. 1981. Computer identification of hardwood species. IAWA Bull. n.s. 2: 37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, J.P. & W.W. Varossieau. 1945. Classification of the structural elements of the secondary wood of dicotyledons using decimal indices for classification and identification of wood species. Blumea 5: 437–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, E.W.J. 1941. The identification of coniferous woods by their microscopic structure. J. Linn. Soc. 52: 259–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyment, R.A. 1969. Biometrical techniques in systematics. Systematic Biology, Proc. Intern. Conf., National Acad. Sci. Washington, D.C.; repr. Publ. Palaeo. Inst. Univ. Uppsala No. 87: 542–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J.H. & J.W. Morris. 1971. Principal components analysis of Acacia burkei and A. nigrescens in Natal. Bothalia 10: 437–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouvier, R. 1966. L’analyse en composantes principales: son utilisation en génétique et ses rapport avec l’analyse discriminatoire. Biometrics 22: 343–357.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanio, K. 1872. Ãœber die Grösse der Holzzellen bei der gemeinen Kiefer (Pinus silvestris). Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. 8: 401–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffé, H. 1959. The analysis of variance. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seal, H.L. 1964. Multivariate statistical analysis for biologists. Methuen & Co., London. Snedecor, G.W. & W.G. Cochran. 1967. Statistical methods. 6th Ed. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R.R. & P.H.A. Sneath. 1963. Principles of numerical taxonomy. Freeman, San Francisco. Steele, J.H., G. Ifju & J.A. Johnson. 1975. Application of stereological techniques to the quantitative characterization of wood microstructure. Proc. 4th Intern. Congr. Stereology, Nat. Bur. Standards Special Publ. 431: 245–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, J.H., G. Ifju & J.A. Johnson. 1976. Quantitative characterization of wood microstructure. J. Microscopy 107: 297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudo, S. 1963. Identification of tropical woods. Bull. Govt. For. Exp. Sta. Meguro 157: 1–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thunell, B. & E. Perem. 1947. Identifiering av träslag. Meddelanden Svenska Träforskning insti-tutet. Trätekniska Avdelning 12: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varossieau, W.W. 1948. The identification of wood species with the aid of the Hollerith system. Blumea 6: 229–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varossieau, W.W. & B.F. Kukachka. 1950. Suggestions for a standardized method of identification with mechanically punched cards. Proc. IAWA Meeting, Stockholm: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zobel, B.J., R.C. Kellison, M.F. Matthias & W.V. Hatcher. 1972. Wood density of the southern pines. North Carolina Agric. Exp. Sta. Techn. Bull. No. 208: 56 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burley, J., Miller, R.B. (1982). The application of statistics and computing in wood anatomy. In: Baas, P. (eds) New Perspectives in Wood Anatomy. Forestry Sciences, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2418-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2418-0_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8269-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2418-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics