Skip to main content

Geographical Patterns of Urban Residential Development

  • Chapter
Modelling Geographical Systems

Part of the book series: The GeoJournal Library ((GEJL,volume 70))

Abstract

In an urbanized environment, the geographical pattern of residential development is a complex phenomenon to model quantitatively. This is because it is a comprehensive and dynamic phenomenon that involves a wide spectrum of social, economic, cultural, and geographical variables. Conventional approaches to studying this phenomenon have been focusing on using one or just a few variables, while holding others constant, to obtain a sketchy impression of how the development of urban residential land use has changed over space and in time. Some examples can be found in Morcombe (1984), Donovan and Neiman (1993), Hitt (1994), Fulford (1996), Fader (2000), and Levia and Page (2000). As such, results from the research and literature on this topic offer only partial understandings of how urban residential lands develop geographically and temporally. For practical application, we would need to develop integrated models with definable quantitative measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Batty, M. (1997), `Cellular automata and urban form: a primer.’ Journal of the American Planning Association, 63 (2), 216–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, W. (1997), `A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area.’ Environment and Planning B, 24, 237–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, A. and J. Ord (1981), Spatial Processes: Models and Applications. Pion, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couclelis, H. (1997), `From cellular automata to urban models: new principles for model development and implementation.’ Environment and Planning B, 24, 165–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, T. and M. Neiman (1993), `Community social status, suburban growth, and local-government restriction on residential development.’ Urban Affair Review, 28, 323–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fader, S. (2000), Density by Design: New Directions in Residential Development. Urban Land Institute, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulford, C. (1996), `The compact city and the market: the case of residential development.’ In M. Jenks, E. Burton and K. Williams (eds.), The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form. E FN Spon, London, pp. 122–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, R.A. (1983), `The evolution of the suburban space economy.’ Urban Geography, 4, 96–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. (1986), Spatial Autocorrelation. CATMOG 47. Geobooks, Norwich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D. (1987), Spatial Autocorrelation: A Primer. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C.D. and E.L. Ullman (1945), `The nature of cities.’ Annals, American Academy of Political and Social Science, CCXLII, 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, K. (1994), Refining 1970’s Land-Use with 1990 Population to !indicate New Residential Development. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA:

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwood, E.M. and R.R. Boyce (1959), Studies of the Central Business District and Urban Freeway Development. University of Washington Press, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, H. (1939), The Structure and Growth of Residential Neighborhoods in American Cities. Federal Housing Administration, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J. and M. Zhang (1998), `The second generation of the California urban future model. Part 1: Model logic and theory.’ Environment and Planning B, 25, 651–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. and D.W.S. Wong (2001), Statistical Analysis with ArcView GIS. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., L. Erickson, T. Kulikowski and L. Tian (1999) `Managing urban sprawl with geographic information systems.’ Environment and Planning B, 25, 865–879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levia, D. and D. Page (2000), `The use of cluster Aanalysis in distinguishing farmland prone to residential development: a case study of sterling.’ Massachusetts. Environmental Management, 25, 541–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morcombe, K. (1984), The Residential Development Process: Housing Policy and Theory. Gower, Brookfield, VT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upton, G. and B. Fingleton (1985), Spatial Data Analysis by Examples. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, J. (2003). Geographical Patterns of Urban Residential Development. In: Boots, B., Okabe, A., Thomas, R. (eds) Modelling Geographical Systems. The GeoJournal Library, vol 70. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2296-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2296-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6104-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2296-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics