Advertisement

The Demise of Immortality

I. Immortality—Going the Way of Miracles
  • Stephen Paul Foster
Part of the International Archives of the History of Ideas / Archives Internationales D’histoire des Idées book series (ARCH, volume 154)

Abstract

The promise of personal immortality is Christianity’s spiritual font of hope and inspiration. By Gibbon’s own account the assurance of it greatly energized the Christians in their early battles against paganism. The reward of heaven and the threat of hell were also powerful proselytizing tools—instrumental in subverting the traditional pagan religions. The doctrine of personal immortality in the Decline and Fall’s history of Christianity is subject to a skeptical, caustic treatment similar to the account of miracles. Like Hume, Gibbon viewed the entire notion as a speculative matter about which nothing can be known. Gibbon was also unremittingly critical of how belief in immortality affects the conduct of believers, and he linked belief in immortality, as he did with belief in miracles, closely to fanaticism and superstition. Both miracles and the hope for immortality were casualties of the philosophic historian’s critique of Christianity. Hume attacked the notions philosophically: Gibbon disparaged them in his history. Belief in miracles and hope for the afterlife, Gibbon insinuates, work on the minds of the believers in a similar fashion. Religious believers invent miracles to impress the doubters and waverers and to confront rival sectarians, and they create eternal paradises as a reward for correct belief and promise hell as the consequence of disbelief. Devout attachment to a belief in immortality, like a belief in the testimony of miracles, turns on the dynamics of the imagination and the passions. The Christian preoccupation with immortality is the work of hope and fear, stimulating a vision of a world beyond the grave.1 Christianity emerged irremediably hostile to the traditional religions of the empire, and the antagonistic new believers, infused with hope for the rewards of the afterlife, became subversive agents of the political authority of the empire. (DF-15, II, 57–58) Gibbon’s critique of immortality is yet another melancholy aspect of his attack on Christianity. The preoccupation with the prospect of the wondrous afterlife by early Christians actually seems to bring degeneration and corruption rather than amelioration. Immortality in the Decline and Fall goes the way of miracles as the spirituality of Christianity is confronted by the naturalism of the Enlightenment.

Keywords

Future Life Roman Empire Relic Worship Eternal Damnation Divine Justice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gibbon himself in a letter of grief to his friend Lord Sheffield over the death of his very dear Aunt Kitty alludes to the emotional force of hope in relation to the belief of immortality. As I grew up, an intercourse of thirty years endeared her to me as the faithful friend and the agreable companion; you have seen with what freedom and confidence we lived together, and have often admired her character and conversation which could alike please the young and old. All this is now lost, finally irrecoverably lost! I will agree with Mylady that the immortality of the soul is, on some occasions, a very comfortable doctrine.“ (Letters-G, III,46) The melancholy tone seems suggestive of Gibbon’s disbelief.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Flew, Hume’s Philosophy of Belief,215, argues that the two essays are integrally connected and that “Of a Particular Providence” is particularly ambitious in its attempts to nullify the significance of natural religion for practical morality.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    The Whole Duty of Man,published e.1658 was a Christian devotional manual that was widely used in England.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    For an account of the publication of these two essays, see the note attached to Hume’s Essays,577.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    See P. Russell, “Epigram, Pantheists, and Freethought in Hume’s Treatise, 664, n.13. The debate on suicide was itself firmly embedded in the wider controversy concerning Christian morality and metaphysicschwr(133)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Peter Gay, The Enlightenment: An Interpretation. Vol. 2, The Science of Freedom ( New York: W. W. Norton, 1969 ), 85.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    See Hume’s (1772) letter to William Strahan complaining of the pirating of these two (“Of Suicide” and “On the Immortality of the Soul”) essays. “But there have other Copies got abroad; and from one of these, some rascally Bookseller is, it seems, printing this Edition.” (Letters-H,II, 253–54)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    See Gay, The Science of Freedom,89, on the subject of the philosophes attitude toward suicide. Hume’s views, anti-Christian and based on an admiration for the heroic suicide of pagans, were widely shared by the Enlightenment writers. Gay also notes, with some irony, I suppose, that very few of the philosophes ever resorted to it. “Hume, like other philosophes, had defended man’s right to suicide, aligning himself with the classical writers and making light of Christian prohibitions. Yet it is worth noting in passing that while the philosophes explored the subject of suicide at some length and approved of it on principle, none of them—with the unlikely exception of Condorcet, who in any event faced certain death—resorted to it, no matter what their private sufferings.”Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mossner, Life of David Hume,33–34.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Quoted from Richard B. Sher, “Professors of Virtue: The Social History of the Edinburgh Moral Philosophy Chair in the Eighteenth Century,” in Studies in the Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment, ed. M. A. Stewart ( Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990 ), 96.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gay, The Science of Freedom,88.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Miller, “Death of Hume,” 30.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carnochan, Gibbon’s Solitude,164.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gay, Science of Freedom,89.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    See Carnochan, Gibbon’s Solitude,138–9, for an extremely insightful interpretation of Hume’s extraordinary remarks about his approaching death.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    For an account of Hume’s death and Boswell’s visit, see Mossner, Life of David Hume,Chapter 39, “Death Comes for the Philosopher.”Google Scholar
  17. Quoted from Mossner, Life of David Hume,597–608. Hume’s death brought amazement and consternation to Boswell. After listening to Hume’s tranquilly-expressed doubts of any future life possibilities, Boswell went away perplexed and disturbed by Flume’s equanimity. Boswell reported his deathbed visit to the death-terrified Johnson and remarked of Hume’s extraordinary cheerfulness and detachment on the brink of his own extinction. “When told by Boswell that Hume had professed to be ‘quite easy at the thought of Annihilation—‘He lied,’ the moralist retorted.” (606).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Miller, “Death of Hume,” 35.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gibbon, less prosaic in this matter than Hume, but no less stoical in the face of dissolution noted with a melancholy tinge in the concluding lines of his Memoirs that, “In old age, the consolation of hope is reserved for the tendemess of parents, who commence a new life in their children; the faith of enthusiasts who sing hallelujahs above the clouds; and the vanity of authors who presume the immorality of their name and writings.” Here we catch a slight glimpse of Gibbon’s own agnosticism with regard to the future life. “The present,” he says, “is a fleeting moment, the past is no more; and our prospect of futurity is dark and doubtful.” (Memoirs,175–6) Gibbon appears to have shared Hume’s philosophical indifference to the possibilities of an eternity of reward or suffering.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    See Peter Byrne, Natural Religion and the Nature of Religion: The Legacy of Deism (London: Routledge, 1989), 79–82. Byrne points out that the deists viewed the growth of the priesthood as an unqualified development of corruption within Christianity. The politics of the priesthood ruined the original pristine character of Christianity. Gibbon certainly speaks this way (ironically perhaps).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    For a modern example of a “scientific” idea (Lysenko’s view of evolution) becoming politicized, see Zhores Medvedev, The Rise and Fall of T. D. Lysenko (New York: Columbia University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. D. Nock, Conversion: The Old and the New in Religion from Alexander the Great to Augustine of Hippo ( Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1933 ), 242.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Robin Lane Fox, Pagans and Christians (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., 1989), 31. Fox writes that the pagans put the greater emphasis on religious acts over beliefs.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lane Fox writes: “[t]o pagans, the Greek word hairesis meant a school of thought, not a false and pernicious doctrine. It applied to the teachings of different philosophical schools and sometimes to the medical schools too. Significantly, some pagans denied it to the Sceptics because they doubted everything and held no positive doctrine themselves: Sceptics, in turn opposed them, wanting to be a hairesis,like other schools. Among pagans, the opposite of ‘heterodoxy’ was not ‘orthodoxy,’ but ‘homodoxy,’ meaning agreement.”Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wilfred Cantwell Smith, The Meaning and End of Religion: A New Approach to the Religious Traditions of Mankind (New York: Macmillan, 1963), 180–81, argues that Christianity is perhaps of all the major religions the most absorbed with belief as a consciously formulated set of propositions, due primarily to the heavy intellectualist influence of Greek thought on Christianity.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lane Fox, Pagans and Christians,447.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    See Peter Brown, The Cult of the Saints: Its Rise and Function in Latin Christianity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981), 2–3. Brown notes that the Christian practice of relic worship broke down previously established boundaries between the living and the dead. Bones, corpses, etc. began to be placed in areas where they never before would have been permitted.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Also, see Brown, Cult of the Saints,13–18. Brown also notes the link of Hume’s Natural History to chapter twenty-eight of the Decline and Fall. Brown is quite critical of what he calls a two-tiered model of religious change by Hume in which the vulgar remain forever limited to popular superstition while reserving to the intellectual elite the possibility for growth and improvement.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen Paul Foster
    • 1
  1. 1.Central Michigan UniversityMount PleasantUSA

Personalised recommendations